Dispute what? Can you form a valid statement let alone argument? You said Bulls can't score. Gonna put two seconds on it?Go..
You said rondo would be brilliant on the Bulls. Explain how.
Go.
Oh, with out 3 HOF'ers to take the defensive attention away from him his game isn't that great?
With the next best scorer being loul deng, he would struggle to get any easy assists by great shooting team mates?
The fact that rondo is in the perfect situation for his skill set where as in chicago what he does would be redundant (they have a bunch of people that can play D and can't shoot) and that CJ watson would be a better starting fit than him?
But please, go on. I'd love to know how someone who doesn't draw a ton of defensive attention with no outside game would make the bulls better.
Remember the start of the seaosn where KG and pierce came in out of shape, and player horribly and the celtics started wracking up losses? Yeah.
Rondo is still flawed, his game is redundant, particularly with a healthy rose, and apart from being a better passer, he does nothing that would help chicago. Teams would literally be able to stand just in the key if he was starting for them.
Thats why. But of course, i'm sure the great shooting of ronnier brewer won't lower his ast total at all.
I know. Sometimes i think people argue for the sake of arguing. He just barked down at my statement, duh dur dur then makes a weird comment about bulls having no scorers....Funny how a no scorer team got the one seed in the east. Funny guy.
Yes, it was the incredible offense the Bulls played that got them the 1 seed. Obviously.
I don't even know why i bother when people don't even think about their statements more in depth than just hur hur stats.