wtf the suns are decent,just checked the standings. giri must be happy ; )
Itll be interesting to see what we do with dragic if we max bledsoe do we max dragic in two years when they have identical stats?no
It all really depends what the next move the suns make is how happy/unhappy i'll be with the season.
one thing i do know for certain, Bledsoe is probably getting a max. Probably.
Itll be interesting to see what we do with dragic if we max bledsoe do we max dragic in two years when they have identical stats?
They can send dragic right over to the knicks.I don't see dragic lasting that long.
On the floor, they don't really work well with each other. They basically take turns running / handling the offense. On the back of that, i fully expect to see Goran go and Bledsoe stay. Goran is also playing so very well that he's really inflating his trade price at the moment.
But it all comes down to the next move IMO. The jazz need a PG bad, but they don't want to give up Hayward either. So who knows. I really don't think they can get Hayward via trading, it would have to be Hayward forcing the issue with the FO on the back of a big offer from the suns.
It's one of these weird situations where it all really depends so heavily on that next move. There's tons of guys i'd love to get, but they all come at a hefty price, and require the guys not traded to kick it up a gear.
They can send dragic right over to the knicks.
Nobody in the West is tanking. Even Utah is trying to win games as of late.
Kobe will lead the Lakers to the worst record in the conference. /believe
Or maybe both years?
I don't see dragic lasting that long.
On the floor, they don't really work well with each other. They basically take turns running / handling the offense. On the back of that, i fully expect to see Goran go and Bledsoe stay. Goran is also playing so very well that he's really inflating his trade price at the moment.
But it all comes down to the next move IMO. The jazz need a PG bad, but they don't want to give up Hayward either. So who knows. I really don't think they can get Hayward via trading, it would have to be Hayward forcing the issue with the FO on the back of a big offer from the suns.
It's one of these weird situations where it all really depends so heavily on that next move. There's tons of guys i'd love to get, but they all come at a hefty price, and require the guys not traded to kick it up a gear.
I don't see dragic lasting that long.
On the floor, they don't really work well with each other. They basically take turns running / handling the offense. On the back of that, i fully expect to see Goran go and Bledsoe stay. Goran is also playing so very well that he's really inflating his trade price at the moment.
I don't know if the suns will trade dragic at all at this point. I think bledsoe and dragic work well together as long as their is a stretch 4 to empty the post for them to drive to the post. It also gives us a good PG on the floor at all times so our bench produces at a better level too. Who knows how it works come playoff time but with small ball on the rise it might work.
Dragic has been one of my faves for a while but I know his days are numbered. If we sign Bledsoe to a max, then we have no reason to keep Dragic. We'd use his high trade value to try and snag a true 2 or 3 so Bledsoe can continue to develop as our star PG.
there is rarely a true SG anymore, you are either a combo guard or a swingman.
One could argue that Wes Matthews has been better than Harden this year also
Nobody in the West is tanking. Even Utah is trying to win games as of late.
Kobe will lead the Lakers to the worst record in the conference. /believe
unarguably the greatest laker of all time if kobe gets us a top 5 pick.
Hello NBAGaf
Not sure if this the right place to post this, but I was thinking recently of how, in soccer, the use of a False Nine [a striker who drifts deeper and plays more like a creator than a finisher, potentially drawing defenders out with him] has become more widespread over the last few years, and wondered if a basketball equivalent would be possible?
Essentially, if you had a tall, strong center, comfortable in the defensive phase against a traditional center, but who in the offensive phase placed himself on the perimeter of the three point zone rather than in the paint. If he was a good three point shooter then this would leave the opposition centre in a quandary. Does he stay in the paint, blocking the lane to the basket and positioning himself for rebounds, thus leaving the offensive center relatively free to take three pointers, or does he follow him out, potentially leaving the centre free for others to drive into.
While I used to really enjoy playing and watching basketball, I have not watched an NBA match in full in going on five-six years, so am coming at this from a relatively uneducated position. I would therefore be appreciative of any thoughts people may have on whether or not such a tactic would work, or indeed, if anything similar has ever been attempted?
Of course it's been done before. Unlike soccer, you can have as many substitutions as you want in basketball so you will see a variety of strategies during a match. Players are constantly being sub in and out depending on who the opponents are currently playing.
Hello NBAGaf
Not sure if this the right place to post this, but I was thinking recently of how, in soccer, the use of a False Nine [a striker who drifts deeper and plays more like a creator than a finisher, potentially drawing defenders out with him] has become more widespread over the last few years, and wondered if a basketball equivalent would be possible?
Essentially, if you had a tall, strong center, comfortable in the defensive phase against a traditional center, but who in the offensive phase placed himself on the perimeter of the three point zone rather than in the paint. If he was a good three point shooter then this would leave the opposition centre in a quandary. Does he stay in the paint, blocking the lane to the basket and positioning himself for rebounds, thus leaving the offensive center relatively free to take three pointers, or does he follow him out, potentially leaving the centre free for others to drive into.
While I used to really enjoy playing and watching basketball, I have not watched an NBA match in full in going on five-six years, so am coming at this from a relatively uneducated position. I would therefore be appreciative of any thoughts people may have on whether or not such a tactic would work, or indeed, if anything similar has ever been attempted?
Thanks. Any examples of centers who play/have played in this manner? And what is generally the reaction of the opposing, defensive center?
Hello NBAGaf
Not sure if this the right place to post this, but I was thinking recently of how, in soccer, the use of a False Nine [a striker who drifts deeper and plays more like a creator than a finisher, potentially drawing defenders out with him] has become more widespread over the last few years, and wondered if a basketball equivalent would be possible?
Essentially, if you had a tall, strong center, comfortable in the defensive phase against a traditional center, but who in the offensive phase placed himself on the perimeter of the three point zone rather than in the paint. If he was a good three point shooter then this would leave the opposition centre in a quandary. Does he stay in the paint, blocking the lane to the basket and positioning himself for rebounds, thus leaving the offensive center relatively free to take three pointers, or does he follow him out, potentially leaving the centre free for others to drive into.
While I used to really enjoy playing and watching basketball, I have not watched an NBA match in full in going on five-six years, so am coming at this from a relatively uneducated position. I would therefore be appreciative of any thoughts people may have on whether or not such a tactic would work, or indeed, if anything similar has ever been attempted?
Thanks for all the replies. As I said in my original post, I was coming at it from a somewhat ignorant place, so it is interesting to learn that this strategy has been used before.
How do teams usually deal with this defensively? Is the defensive center drawn from his normal position out towards the perimeter, or do they instead take on a zonal marking system, with the defensive center simply dealing with any outside runners who make their way into the paint?
usually the center just marks his man.. because while they might be able to shoot they cant really put the ball on the floor and drive..
Few big men could do that... Webber and Kevin Garnett come to mind...
Thanks for all the replies. As I said in my original post, I was coming at it from a somewhat ignorant place, so it is interesting to learn that this strategy has been used before.
How do teams usually deal with this defensively? Is the defensive center drawn from his normal position out towards the perimeter, or do they instead take on a zonal marking system, with the defensive center simply dealing with any outside runners who make their way into the paint?
Doesn't that leave a lot of space in the middle, allowing a shooting ground or one of the two forwards an opportunity to drive into the space? Sorry for all the questions, I am genuinely interested. If there is a website that explains basketball strategy then I'm happy to be pointed in that direction instead of taking up all of your time with endless questions.
I don't see dragic lasting that long.
It's one of these weird situations where it all really depends so heavily on that next move. There's tons of guys i'd love to get, but they all come at a hefty price, and require the guys not traded to kick it up a gear.
You can't take away EVERYTHING, but better defenses close out well on the shooters and would rather live with the mid-range jumpshot, which is the worst shot in the league in todays NBA.
Vag is rolling in his grave
Vag is rolling in his grave
Kobe looks like he's trapped eternally in 2006 with his shot selection and decision making these days so yea he probably should be.
Hello NBAGaf
Not sure if this the right place to post this, but I was thinking recently of how, in soccer, the use of a False Nine [a striker who drifts deeper and plays more like a creator than a finisher, potentially drawing defenders out with him] has become more widespread over the last few years, and wondered if a basketball equivalent would be possible?
Essentially, if you had a tall, strong center, comfortable in the defensive phase against a traditional center, but who in the offensive phase placed himself on the perimeter of the three point zone rather than in the paint. If he was a good three point shooter then this would leave the opposition centre in a quandary. Does he stay in the paint, blocking the lane to the basket and positioning himself for rebounds, thus leaving the offensive center relatively free to take three pointers, or does he follow him out, potentially leaving the centre free for others to drive into.
While I used to really enjoy playing and watching basketball, I have not watched an NBA match in full in going on five-six years, so am coming at this from a relatively uneducated position. I would therefore be appreciative of any thoughts people may have on whether or not such a tactic would work, or indeed, if anything similar has ever been attempted?
Lebron's shooting the three at a better percentage than love or KD this season. He's having a rough slump in december though(as far as 3pt% goes)Is this chart misleading? Lebron is considered more stretchy vs defense than KD or Love at 4? My eyes tell me KD and Love are better 3pt shooters than Bron. I would have prefered the chart if it was DRTG and %anything 15ft away from basket. Though it wouldnt surprise me if Lebron still comes out better on that because his shot selection is so good.
Just reading the Muhammad Ali thread and had to smh at the folks arguing that the current NBA is better and tougher than the NBA of the 90s.
That's because it is, but you wouldn't know because you didn't watch enough basketball in the 90's. You can't get an accurate depiction of what 90's basketball was like based off hearsay and Youtube clips.
Man you are my favorite joke character here