Dont you have to put Jerry West on top 10, all time?
Oh, right.
Sorry Kobe, out of the Top 10 you go!
Dont you have to put Jerry West on top 10, all time?
Trolling isn't exclusive to fact or fiction and your bullshit is tired so yeah.
I didn't watch the game yet but "07 flashback" does seem a bit hyperbolic according to the play by play. The whole empty trip dub bullshit is tired too. You complain of coming back to the same ole arguments but yet you come back with the same ole tired bullshit.
Dont you have to put Jerry West on top 10, all time?
Yeah, these are good. I guess I did cross the wires by talking about All-Star selections and then "All-Star level" and so I could argue myself out of those by pointing out Kevin Willis or Doc Rivers had 17+ PERs a couple times and same for LMA (who was even better). But that Hawks one especially is a nice example to ponder.In case you missed it:
And shit, '08 and '09 Blazers. Duh.
Because during his 2 year run, everyone knew Hakeem was the best. Right? The 2 years Jordan went to go play baseball? Where he was the best before and immediately after that 2 year run?
Seems kinda shaky to me
Yeah, these are good. I guess I did cross the wires by talking about All-Star selections and then "All-Star level" and so I could argue myself out of those by pointing out Kevin Willis or Doc Rivers had 17+ PERs a couple times and same for LMA (who was even better). But that Hawks one especially is a nice example to ponder.
So we've got Jordan, LeBron and Nique when he was at his most insane scoring level.
And on the other end we have basically every good big ever lol
Dont you have to put Jerry West on top 10, all time?
Tell me one thing I said that wasn't the truth and "bullshit".
It's an inconvenient truth, I know but a truth nonetheless:
Your boy had a great game and disappeared in the 4th when the team really needed him, resulting in another worthless Finals triple double. (I think he had at least one in the 2011 Finals too)
That's a fact.
I know it's easier to cop out and say what I'm saying is "tired" but the truth is what it is: The ESPN proclaimed GOAT disappeared in the 4th.
Again.
Heres the deal, Kobe isnt better than MJ, Magic, Kareem, Russell, and possibly/ probably Wilt, Bird. This bring us to the bottom 6-10. Kobe never EVER won and dominated like Hakeem did but had tons more support. Kobe NEVER dominated like Shaq did even when he was the Alpha. Kobe hasnt been the 1st option on as many chips as TD. Why would I choose Kobe over any of these players? Because he won 5 chips? Look at the teams. Because he played 17 years? Congrats. Because he has scored 30k points? So has Karl Malone. Why am I choosing Kobe?
Bullshit isn't exclusive to fact or fiction. Again.
And unless the play by plays are lying, the stats show that you are full of shit. I'll watch the game and see but yeah, I'm calling bullshit.
Bullshit isn't exclusive to fact or fiction. Again.
And unless the play by plays are lying, the stats show that you are full of shit. I'll watch the game and see but yeah, I'm calling bullshit.
Statically he shits all over Kobe in everything but points and ast.. and they aren't far off..
Rebounds, Steals, Blocks... regardless of position he was just a more valuable basketball player.
And then he owned the league for 2 years without much help one year and a showing his age Clyde the next. And really almost NO ONE has ever questioned Dream getting picked over MJ to this day.. and MJ is the greatest..
And on that list only MJ was the player you would say is the best player on both ends of the floor in almost any match-up.. Not with Kobe not with Magic not with Bird.. only Dream and MJ
You're arguing based on what you read in the play-by-play and you haven't watched the game? LOL
Bruh. I'm calling bullshit on you. At one point, Lebron had 16 points on 16FGA and 2FTA with 2 minutes to go in the fourth.
Kind of figures Vag would be this huge a Kobe stan considering how often he shoots his own team out of games.
The steals is .2 difference. That's hardly "shitting all over". Their TS% is the same. Kobe scores more points and gets more assists. Hakeem gets more blocks and gets more rebounds.
Kobe was a better defender than Bird and Magic. Only guy he wasn't better than was Jordan on that list as a perimeter player. Are you willing to say Dream was definitively better defensively than Russell or TD? Was he definitively better offensively then Wilt, Shaq, or Kareem?
I'm just not buying the argument man, you're making statements which just don't seem to be true.
One thing that comes to mind with Reggie's Pacers and also the Great Pistons teams is whether or not those were really "superstar" level players in all aspects. Do you know what I mean? Both teams had to rely on depth to build around Reggie/Isiah/Billups+Wallace in a much more overzealous manner than many teams.'95 and '96 Pacers?
1999-2000 exists in your world right? The one where Shaq actually committed and destroyed the league on both ends and put up one of the all-time greatest seasons?Kobe's 2005-2006 Regular Season was more dominant than any Shaq has ever had.
1999-2000 exists in your world right? The one where Shaq actually committed and destroyed the league on both ends and put up one of the all-time greatest seasons?
One thing that comes to mind with Reggie's Pacers and also the Great Pistons teams is whether or not those were really "superstar" level players in all aspects. Do you know what I mean? Both teams had to rely on depth to build around Reggie/Isiah/Billups+Wallace in a much more overzealous manner than many teams.
The three-peat Lakers with Shaq and even with Gasol tailed off quickly going to even starters, let alone reserves. But the Pistons and Pacers often had bench players who could start elsewhere (and later many did) so I kinda question if they apply as much.
Reggie made five all-star teams and only three All-NBA, all third, teams. I think that starts to step out of the "all-time superstar" question a bit where this whole ranking Kobe madness exists.
Though it is interesting to think about, it may be just starting to look at how teams are constructed more than anything. Which is always fascinating.
Bullshit isn't exclusive to fact or fiction. Again.
And unless the play by plays are lying, the stats show that you are full of shit. I'll watch the game and see but yeah, I'm calling bullshit.
I just realized that Duncan hasn't averaged above 35MPG since 2004 when he was 27 (36.6MPG) years old. His career MPG is right at 35.1MPG (41,447 minutes played).
You're arguing based on what you read in the play-by-play and you haven't watched the game? LOL
Bruh. I'm calling bullshit on you. At one point, Lebron had 16 points on 16FGA and 2FTA with 2 minutes to go in the fourth.
Nah Heat played like shit in the 4th all around. Wade was gone after the 2nd. Bron wasn't even moving like he usually does.
Yeah, Reggie is without a doubt an offensive superstar and he would win you games based on that. But he was just shy of that level where you could say "this dude alone makes you a contender" because he didn't rebound, his defense was lacking for a long time, took him a while to learn how to create plays for others, etc.Yeah, that's why I posed it as a question. When all is said and done though, Reggie finished his career as a Hall-of-Famer with 25,000 points to his resume and some crazy good offensive statistical seasons (90, 91, 94 at a near or at 50-40-90 clip and 62-65 TS%).
The problem with Reggie was, and what doesn't put him in that discussion (like you said) was that he was a one dimensional player. But shit, if he wasn't great at his one dimension.
I would love to see Reggie's shot chart for the 90s.
1999-2000 exists in your world right? The one where Shaq actually committed and destroyed the league on both ends and put up one of the all-time greatest seasons?
Malone had a better regular season than Kobe did.
truth
Sure, why not? And missed field goals isn't that bad to me. Hot potato ball is but still. I saw he brought it within 2.
'03 T-Mac > '06 Kobe
This confirms what I've long suspected you're focused incredibly on (perimeter) scoring. Kobe's usage was beyond historic.Kobe significantly more points and steals.
Shaq significantly more rebounds and blocks.
TS% is .02 percent different.
Both ALL NBA First Team and ALL NBA First Team Defense. I watched every game of both those seasons. What Kobe did in 2005-2006 was the greatest individual season I've ever seen.
40 points a night was routine for him. 30 was a bad game. It was insane how unstoppable he was.
2003 McGrady is such an amazing season, it's Jordan with worse defense and like four off the dribble threes a game.'03 T-Mac > '06 Kobe
Better FG%, better assists, better rebounding, less turnovers, better TS%, better eFG%, better ORTg, less USG%, more WS (with 5 less games!), better WS/48 (league best)
This confirms what I've long suspected you're focused incredibly on (perimeter) scoring.
Shaq dictated the league in his season. (Among a few others.) There is no statistical comparison. There is basically no narrative comparison. 67 wins and a title vs 45 wins and quitting in game seven.
2000 Shaq or 2006 Kobe on the 11-12 Bobcats. Which team wins more games? There is literally only one right answer here. I cannot fathom what the opposite argument even looks like.
2003 McGrady is such an amazing season, it's Jordan with worse defense and like four off the dribble threes a game.
Dude. He stood around all fourth quarter and did nothing. It was insane. You saw the fear in his eyes. The trepidation. It was 2011 Mavs all over again. Please watch the fourth quarter, specifically from about the 7:00 mark until about the 2:00 mark and tell me you don't see that.
Blatant Vagahn bait.
Neither won a chip those years.
LoserBros.
Although, T-Mac could chip this year!
It would mean McGrady has never lost in the Finals. LeBron would have done it three times...Does T-Mac chipping this year mean he is equal to Lebron?
Does T-Mac chipping this year mean he is equal to Lebron?
While scoring 0 points!
Truly the sign of the greatest player.
This confirms what I've long suspected you're focused incredibly on (perimeter) scoring. Kobe's usage was beyond historic.
Shaq dictated the league in his season. (Among a few others.) There is no statistical comparison. There is basically no narrative comparison. 67 wins and a title vs 45 wins and quitting in game seven of the first round.
2000 Shaq or 2006 Kobe on the 11-12 Bobcats. Which team wins more games? There is literally only one right answer here. I cannot fathom what the opposite argument even looks like.
2003 McGrady is such an amazing season, it's Jordan with worse defense and like four off the dribble threes a game.
There is still something amazing about Kobe posting the greatest Usage Rate in history while posting his best turnover rate. And his only one under 9.5.If anything, 2007 was Kobe's best year. The only reason his PER wasn't as good is because of Hollinger's idiotic insistence to give USG Rtg so much weight.
Oh my god, I am now talking about Kobe vs T-Mac.
Next thing you know, I'll impregnate some women and ditch. Time for bed.
There is still something amazing about Kobe posting the greatest Usage Rate in history while posting his best turnover rate. And his only one under 9.5.