Shamrock7r
Member
Coming of age game for Leonard
These Blake commercials are so much better than Cliff Paul.
Anyways, Jesus is on the Spur's side!
Spurs are scary good. How are they doing this without Parker?
Biggest joke in the NBA is D-Will?
what do you mean?Still the refs, who apparently dont know what a reach-in or hack foul is anymore.
Still the refs, who apparently dont know what a reach-in or hack foul is anymore.
They were just showing the Shaq/Cat gif on TNT. lmao
Steve Kerr is the Warriors new coach.
I'm not sure I feel good about this.
Also 5 years is a stupid ass contract my god.
Steve Kerr might regret his choice to coach the warriors after he realizes how hard it is to just make the playoffs in the west.
I like this idea. #fucktheleastThe NBA needs to do the right thing and go to a top-16-overall format. The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up. And the leastern losers aren't helped by getting into the playoffs unfairly because it just gives them a worse pick.
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPDoesn't matter where Steve Kerr ended up, he's destined to be a bust. His reign in Phoenix flopped, and no one wanted him until Phil Jackson did. Suddenly he becomes the hottest coach available.
Golden State is dumb as hell.
The NBA needs to do the right thing and go to a top-16-overall format. The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up. And the leastern losers aren't helped by getting into the playoffs unfairly because it just gives them a worse pick.
The NBA needs to do the right thing and go to a top-16-overall format. The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up. And the leastern losers aren't helped by getting into the playoffs unfairly because it just gives them a worse pick.
The NBA needs to do the right thing and go to a top-16-overall format. The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up. And the leastern losers aren't helped by getting into the playoffs unfairly because it just gives them a worse pick.
Because Portland's defense is scary bad.
The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up.
I doubt the ratings for Eastern conference games are all that great, the biggest story and drama is what is the wrong with Pacers, which is hardly a ratings pull "COME SEE IF THE PACERS CAN STOP SUCKING, JOIN US LIVEEE!!". Last year it was whether Rose would be back to help the Bulls and the whole playoff tree featured one significant series in Pacers - Heat. Years prior to that it was whether the Celtics still "got it". The time before that it was whether LeBron could drag the carcass of Cavs to the finals. The conference has sucked for a long time.
There is a feeling that every western conference playoff team would beat every eastern conference playoff team bar the Heat in a 7 game series. And maybe even the Suns could beat the likes of Nets and Pacers.
Its just not good TV, even if you are a Heat fan, there is not pull to see them shit on Bobcats, there is something slightly sweet seeing LeBron dominate Pierce and Garnett, but he has done that before, its like John Cena overcoming the odds again. So even if you support the top teams in the East, there is not much there to enjoy right now.
I am pretty salty about this, but its still been a great playoff season so far, but that is 99% due to the western conference, the 1% is reserved for East and those who enjoy watching Pacers flounder around
The NBA needs to do the right thing and go to a top-16-overall format. The western conference owners run their teams 100x better and their reward is a playoff gauntlet, they have to be getting fed up. And the leastern losers aren't helped by getting into the playoffs unfairly because it just gives them a worse pick.
Steve Kerr has gotten too much praise from too many legends of the game to be a complete bust. Warriors have freaking Jerry West doing consulting for the them , some of you dudes think you know more crap than the logo? Heck someone just said nobody wanted him until Phil Jackson did... Think about that, Phil Jackson has more knowledge in his left nut than you do. Not to mention they are gonna get a stud assistant coach and staff around him, Kerr has legit connections.
Look at Mark Jackson, never particularly prepared, not so much a bright mind, and just overall bland besides his relationship with the players and he was able to get 50 wins out of them. On all accounts Kerr seems like a way more knowledgeable individual that can incorporate some type of strategy unlike Jackson.
Yeah, all of that is why I'm holding out hope that he'll be okay. I just was a little surprised that he seemed to be so in-demand without any experience.Steve Kerr has gotten too much praise from too many legends of the game to be a complete bust. Warriors have freaking Jerry West doing consulting for the them , some of you dudes think you know more crap than the logo? Heck someone just said nobody wanted him until Phil Jackson did... Think about that, Phil Jackson has more knowledge in his left nut than you do. Not to mention they are gonna get a stud assistant coach and staff around him, Kerr has legit connections.
Look at Mark Jackson, never particularly prepared, not so much a bright mind, and just overall bland besides his relationship with the players and he was able to get 50 wins out of them. On all accounts Kerr seems like a way more knowledgeable individual that can incorporate some type of strategy unlike Jackson.
Agreed. Listening to local radio the last month or so there's been a lot of crazy shit about Jackson's time here and his relationship with the front office and other coaches.Mark Jackson would have been fine if he wasn't such a prick. Him and Mike Malone wouldn't even communicate at times and look at the crazy on goings this year. Dude wouldn't listen to anyone about actual coaching implementations.
He called coaching his part time job, the dude was able to hold sermons after games, lol... It's ridiculous.
So I'm new to basketball, can anyone explain to me why everything is a foul?
It happens so much I couldn't have told the difference.
What determines what is a foul and what isn't?
I'm not really bitching about it, I just want information that will help me follow the game better.
Thunder may be 4-0 against the Spurs this season but I think we just learned that doesn't mean shit.
Don't worry about fouls then and just enjoy the superhuman feats of athleticism.
But I explained why.
I want to know why a foul is called when it's called.
Like, what is the general principle of the game that is being violated when a foul is called?
There are lots of different kinds of fouls.
Here's a basic beginner's guide to basketball. Some of these concepts don't specifically apply to the NBA, but it's a pretty good general guide:
http://www.breakthroughbasketball.com/basics/basics.html
Of course, a lot of what is and isn't appropriate is up to interpretation, and NBA referees have a long history of shitty interpretation.
The biggest time I see it called, (and the reason I'm bringing it up now is because a few pages back in this thread I saw it being discussed as a viable strategy for getting free throws), is when an offensive player will drive towards the basket.
From the games I've seen, this results in a foul A LOT.
I asked my friend about it, who likes basketball, and he said something about positioning.
Like, if a player is running in a straight line towards the basket. you can step in front of him, and he has to either stop or knock you over, but you can't grab him from the side or run into him.
Is that how it works?