2015 Console Screenshot Thread (PS4, XB1, Wii U) [READ OP!]

1447621065-undvik.png


1447620952-archipel-de-skellige-1.png
 
funkystudent said:
OSN9MqM.png


1G5WmG3.png




Fallout 4 isnt a terrible looking game a lot of the time. I think the lighting model + colour makes it very pleasing in most cases. But BOY... if you want to make it ugly you dont have to look hard.
Click to expand...

Damn it's really hurt to see FO4 next to your W3 shot, seems like completely different consoles running them, and TW3 runs much better to boot :(
 
Lukas Japonicus said:
It's amazing how Battlefront's IQ is so much better than BF4's despite also looking and running better.

I'd love some environmental shots of Endor.
Click to expand...

I'm tired of people saying this. There is absolutely nothing amazing about it. There are less players than BF4 and there is no destruction. That cuts down significantly on the computing requirements. It is not amazing at all.
 
TheSpecialOne said:
I'm tired of people saying this. There is absolutely nothing amazing about it. There are less players than BF4 and there is no destruction. That cuts down significantly on the computing requirements. It is not amazing at all.
Click to expand...

Its amazing for a lot of people who prefer superior IQ, superior graphical rendering and superior performance over destruction and more players.

I think that's all there is to it.
 
Inuhanyou said:
Its amazing for a lot of people who prefer superior IQ, superior graphical rendering and superior performance over destruction and more players.

I think that's all there is to it.
Click to expand...

Not really, the claim was that it was amazing that it looked better and ran better than bf4. People like digital foundry posting articles saying dice had optimized their engine and etc. When you look at the reasons why they are able to accomplish what they have, you see that it is the only logical progression. When you cut out huge resource hogs, then you have more power to work with. They don't have synced waves to deal with, 64 players, destruction, "bigger maps", etc. There is absolutely nothing amazing about this accomplishment. They are not overachieving in anyway shape or form. Congrats to them on making a decent looking game but I'd really appreciate it people would stop misusing the term "amazing". It's almost as bad as people giving 9's and 10's to games that aren't even a 7.
 
TheSpecialOne said:
Not really, the claim was that it was amazing that it looked better and ran better than bf4. People like digital foundry posting articles saying dice had optimized their engine and etc. When you look at the reasons why they are able to accomplish what they have, you see that it is the only logical progression. When you cut out huge resource hogs, then you have more power to work with. They don't have synced waves to deal with, 64 players, destruction, "bigger maps", etc. There is absolutely nothing amazing about this accomplishment. They are not overachieving in anyway shape or form. Congrats to them on making a decent looking game but I'd really appreciate it people would stop misusing the term "amazing". It's almost as bad as people giving 9's and 10's to games that aren't even a 7.
Click to expand...
Incredible salt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2025 | Console Screenshot thread - making PCs seem overkill
2 3 4 5 6
264
14K
Skifi28 replied
  • Poll
2025 PC Screenshot Thread of No Compromises | "Can't see fake frames on screenshots"
|OT|  2 3 4 5
207
15K
yamaci17 replied
Switch 2 upgrades look worse than Wii U emulation upscaling
2 3 4
198
10K
nkarafo replied
Recommend me some 3 Player Co-Op Games (ps4 or super dated PC)
33
1K
Three replied
The next console manufacteur?
Opinion Hardware  2 3
129
802
RAIDEN1 replied
Top Bottom