Thebeardofknowledge
Banned
Fuck I miss him and siskel
It is true that I am fat, but one day I will be thin, and he will still be the director of 'The Brown Bunny.'
Nah it's just an ensemble movie that is all about trying to find the culprit with an ending twist. Nothing pretentious about it.
Fun performances too. Especially Spacey and Del Toro. Not a classic like some people try to paint it as but it was fun imo.
Ah, an old friend made it sound like some must see magnum opus. Spoiler it for me what's the twist? I'm never going to see it.
I mean... I quote The Room all the time
One of my favorite Ebert blog posts, I'm A Proud Brainiac, in which he destroys the weirdos screaming at him for not liking Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.
The core mystery of the movie is a cop interrogating small time hood Kevin Spacey as to the identity of super criminal Keyser Sose, as Spacey tells him the story of the big heist gone wrong.It turns out that Spacey himself is Keyser Sose, which is incredibly obvious from the very first scene in which Sose is mentioned if you're paying attention even a tiny bit whatsoever. A bunch of the names and details of the story he told the cop come from objects sitting around the cop's office, so in the end how much of the story was true and how much was bullshit is entirely up to the viewer.
Nah. It's just a good homage to an oft-spun Winston Churchill quote:this is still one of the best film critic burns ever
Oh snap so kinda like Se7en then? Man love spacey I was a teenager when usual suspects came out. I think I might watch it anyway spoilers do not bother me in the slightest.
SwagEbert also gave me one of my favorite quotes about films: "It's not what your movie is about. It's how it is about it."
Swag
If Ebert was like two generations younger and he was introduced to GAF, I bet he would've been an active and provocative and (famous) GAF member.
"But the thing is, I remember 'Freddy Got Fingered' more than a year later. I refer to it sometimes. It is a milestone. And for all its sins, it was at least an ambitious movie, a go-for-broke attempt to accomplish something. It failed, but it has not left me convinced that Tom Green doesn't have good work in him. Anyone with his nerve and total lack of taste is sooner or later going to make a movie worth seeing."
Another nice thing about Ebert is that he wasn't above revisiting films years later to review them again. Originally, he gave Unforgiven 2.5 stars, but he revisited it years later to award it the 4 star review. Big Lebowski was a 3 star film originally, but eventually elevated to 4 stars.
Why do movie critics always talk about things in exaggerated insults?
Really? Why?
Because it's the most vapid imaginable treatment of the Seven Deadly Sins concept, I dislike everything about Fincher's directing style, Pitt's performance is embarrassingly bad, and it's constantly touted by wannabe film school rejects as some kind of masterpiece.
However, it's at least about something, and even if I hate the visual style, it does have a visual style, so I have to put it above The Usual Suspects.
Can we talk about this shit, though?
17. The Village, one star.
Eventually the secret of Those, etc., is revealed. Its a crummy secret, about one step up the ladder of narrative originality from It Was All a Dream. Its so witless, in fact, that when we do discover the secret, we want to rewind the film so we dont know the secret anymore. And then keep on rewinding, and rewinding, until were back at the beginning, and can get up from our seats and walk backward out of the theater and go down the up escalator and watch the money spring from the cash register into our pockets.
Can we talk about this shit, though?