Sho_Nuff82
Member
Art needs good criticism and critical language. Games lack this hilariously.
Gamers get super, super salty at reviews with snark.
Art needs good criticism and critical language. Games lack this hilariously.
Gamers get super, super salty at reviews with snark.
Gamers get super, super salty at reviews with snark.
Hell, they get salty over GOOD reviewsGamers get super, super salty at reviews with snark.
Gamers get salty over everything.
Ebert was the perfect balance of film lover, being critical and being able to speak with a measured voice about film to an audience. He had passion that never really rolled into hyperbole. I don't know if many other critics, particularly when it comes to reviews, strike that as well as he did. There are others I enjoy reading but you could tell immediately something that Ebert wrote.
He wrote in that "speaking voice" as though he's communicating directly to you without sacrificing the points and analysis with it. His "Great Movies" essays are some of the best write-ups on film out there. I always got the sense he could write pages and pages more on one film but forced himself to limit it. There's a lot of critics and film scholars out there that can write a ton about a film but I don't think anyone conveyed it as eloquently as Ebert could.
Gamers get super, super salty at reviews with snark.
The writer and director are just feeding us a bullshit story for a couple of hours. It's interesting that one of the things that gets people bent out of shape about the usual suspects is that they didn't get the 'true' story and that they wasted their time watching a made up one. That they'll never know what really happened.How so?
The reason I was so drawn to him years ago wasn't if I agreed with him or not (more often than not I did) but because his writing was amazing. This, augmented with his encyclopedic knowledge of cinema, make him one of the greatest critics who's ever lived.
Robert Eger?
Not with that twist.The Village is a masterpiece btw.
Gamers get salty over everything.
Imagine a critic disliking a game the way Ebert disliked Blue Velvet. I'm sure there would be nerd rage (and I'm sure its already happened.)
Telling someone on Twitter that they're a cunt and should die is the only way to prove how much of an artform videogames are.
Which is basically the premise of all movies. I'm actually surprised that he didn't like that part of it.
Reading his review, it sounds like he watched it the first time under poor circumstances and this colored his opinion. Also, he actually did not understand some of the movie, Hockney states that he stole the truck that had them in the line-up, and more importantly it should be obvious that Soze orchestrated the line-up so as to put his team together for the final job.
Yeah, he can fuck off for Usual Suspects and especially Tommy Boy.
Who doesn't like Tommy Boy?!
What about it, pretzel man? What's your story?
Interrogation Cop: You know what happens if you do another turn in the joint?
Hockney: Fuck your father in the shower and then have a snack? Are you going to charge me dickhead?
Fenster: Man, I had a finger up my asshole tonight.
Hockney: Is it Friday already?
Back when I was picking beans in Guatemala, we used to make fresh coffee, right off the trees I mean. That was good. This is shit but, hey, I'm in a police station.
Oh, gee, thanks, Dave. Bang-up job so far. Extortion, coercion. You'll pardon me if I ask you to kiss my pucker.
That guy is tense. Tension is a killer. I used to be in a barbershop quartet in Skokie, Illinois. The baritone was this guy named Kip Diskin, big fat guy, I mean, like, orca fat. He was so stressed in the morning...
Can we talk about this shit, though?
Am I the only one that thinks Freddy got Fingered is pretty funny? I have it on DVD. It's exactly the kind of absurd humor me and my friends had when we were teenagers/early twenties.
DerZuhälter;228253976 said:Well it explains why he gave The Raid only one star.
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-raid-redemption-2012
Usual suspects and Tommy Boy are awesome. This guy sucks.
I'm not sure what Ebert saw in the theatrical revision of the Brown Bunny that he later praised it.
I have the dvd. (I love Sevigny, and had to see the movie), and there is no movie until she appears in the hotel. Its just Gallo driving around, occasionally stopping to meet a few women. Pointless.
The ending at the hotel is kind of fascinating in that it could be really creepy depending oh how you look at it. It did not need the notorious scene. Its just exploitive bullshit.
Buffalo 66 with Christine Ricci was a very good movie. So Gallo is not without talent.
No one is perfect. Not everyone sees Freddy Got Fingered as the cinematic masterpiece that it genuinely is.
I remember he didn't like Blue Velvet at all, that was the one that made me stop taking his reviews as seriously. I'd expect him to see beyond the supposed misogyny of the film to know how good that one is.
I remember he didn't like Blue Velvet at all, that was the one that made me stop taking his reviews as seriously. I'd expect him to see beyond the supposed misogyny of the film to know how good that one is.
He and Gallo got in a huge fight about the movie. Ebert said it sucked and Gallo called him a fat-ass. Ebert came back saying I can always lose weight, but you'll still be the director of Brown Bunny. Gallo went back and edited it and replayed it. It played much better and Ebert liked it. The ver you saw is probably the edited ver of it.
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-brown-bunny-2004
He would be perma banned in no time.If Ebert was like two generations younger and he was introduced to GAF, I bet he would've been an active and provocative and (famous) GAF member.