Baconsaurus Rex
Member
I know, I know. But I want to look handsome when I go outside!Aesthetics are not an asset in picking good headphones.
Anybody know more about the INCIPIO FORTE F38 or the Panasonic RP-HTX7?
I know, I know. But I want to look handsome when I go outside!Aesthetics are not an asset in picking good headphones.
JVC HA-S500 are probably the best sounding this range, either those or the RHAs
JVC HA-S500 are probably the best sounding this range, either those or the RHAs
Dont worry about that all just listen to your headphones for a while to give yourself time to become acclimated to them.Completely unrelated, but I looked up an Amazon review for these and it led me to this question about "burn-in" or breaking in headphones.
What's the best, quickest route to getting a new pair of headphones to sounding how they should? They mentioned white/pink noise for 100hrs.
Completely unrelated, but I looked up an Amazon review for these and it led me to this question about "burn-in" or breaking in headphones.
What's the best, quickest route to getting a new pair of headphones to sounding how they should? They mentioned white/pink noise for 100hrs.
You know what's annoying? going to the head-fi thread after getting a new set of IEMs, wanting to talk about them and seeing the last 20 pages are about the need to "burn in" a new silver cable.
burning in cables, folks. fuck that noise. that place is bonkers.
Burning in a cable? Is silver cables really a thing? Gotta get that 5% less resistance?
God, head-fi is a fucked up place, indeed. The fact that trying to google the issue brings only up forum posts proclaiming what a difference in sound it made, makes it quite obvious that it's not a thing. With braided cables, I can understand a difference in direction. With braided cables, I can even understand a difference over time. Somewhat. I don't know.
But burning in a cable is so unscientific it hertz.
You know what's annoying? going to the head-fi thread after getting a new set of IEMs, wanting to talk about them and seeing the last 20 pages are about the need to "burn in" a new silver cable.
burning in cables, folks. fuck that noise. that place is bonkers.
Burn is does exist but from emasurements nothing is visible anymore beyond 20 hours. And the difference is mostly in your head, you adapt to a sound signature. Even knowing you burned them in will skew your perception."Burn-in" is pretty subjective: some think it works, some don't. I'm in the former camp and burn new headphones in for anywhere from 50-100 hours. I use two tracks on repeat; Track 1 is 20 minutes of pink noise followed by Track 2, which is 2 minutes of silence. I set the volume to a comfortable listening level and let the headphones burn in while I'm asleep or at work for about 10-14 days.
I know many people would tell me I'm wasting my time, and burn-in might be a placebo effect, but I believe it makes a difference. You can try it for a few hours and see if anything changes for you, or just use your headphones as much as possible and let your ears get used to the sound. But if you do burn-in, don't set the volume too high or you could cause some irreversible damage.
Burning in a cable? Is silver cables really a thing? Gotta get that 5% less resistance?
God, head-fi is a fucked up place, indeed. The fact that trying to google the issue brings only up forum posts proclaiming what a difference in sound it made, makes it quite obvious that it's not a thing. With braided cables, I can understand a difference in direction. With braided cables, I can even understand a difference over time. Somewhat. I don't know.
But burning in a cable is so unscientific it hertz.
Braided cables make sense, scientifically.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twisted_pair
I actually didn't want to believe it having always thought cables were total bullshit. And in fact, I thought the Silver/Gold cable was bullshit cause when I first swapped out that cable for my cheapo Westone Elite cable, i couldn't really tell a difference.
Audiophile "science" just angers me. All to get you to needlessly spend money on thousand dollar cables, amps, DACs, USB cards, etc... Audiophiles try to convince me that a $1000 media player on Mac sounds better than any other media player.
I'm a firm believe in AB testing. Out of personal experience, I see the extra money spent on headphones/speakers makes a big difference. I have a hard time even justifying amps/dacs that are a few hundred dollars because the differences are so minute, and when they're pronounced, I get the impression that the device is just purposefully coloring the sound.
And the difference is mostly in your head, you adapt to a sound signature.
There's a difference between braided and twisted Braided would be taking strands of copper and actually braiding them. I guess it might be in the same vain as the logic behind twisted pair, but I don't know.
Well, gold is 54% more resistant than silver. I don't know how that resistance translates to reactance, but a gold cable could quite easily become a filter of some sort, to a 54% bigger extent than a silver wire.
Yeah, I went with the equipment that NwAvGuy made, and I love it, because science. And just look at the opposition he met, trying to fight the ignorance going around in the audiophile community. It's pretty clear that it's turning into a conglomerate of people spending too much money on something they can't explain themselves, and thus clinging on to whatever made them do it in the first place.
Oh god yeah, your daily condition can impact the love for your gear so hard. One day you love it, one day you hate it, back and forth. Today too little bass, tomorrow too much.I think what would have a greater effect than burn in would be that the more you use a pair, the cushions will flatten a bit and the whole thing kind of twists to the angles of your head, and you subconsciously adjust them to be comfortable, and the mix of it all just changes the seal, angles, and distances in the cup to change the sound.
Any which way, I think it's not worth getting too picky about. You do adjust to different sound, your mood can change how you perceive what elements stand out, or if you've been out in the noisy world, etc. Once you get to a certain level of quality, the variables of life take over any importance the differences would have had. Same goes for when you are producing.
Burn is does exist but from emasurements nothing is visible anymore beyond 20 hours. And the difference is mostly in your head, you adapt to a sound signature. Even knowing you burned them in will skew your perception.
I spent so much money on speakers until I learned what really makes a system tick :-
I finally decided on headphones, after much deciding, I'm going with the AKG Q701s. Going with black even tho the white is tempting. I'll also pick up a Fiio E7 too. Tried them out today and they were marvellous, putting to shame the Sennheiser, Sony, Pioneer, Wilkes and Boothes comparative models.All the while making Beats and similar brands look, sound and feel like garbage.
Picking them up at the end of the month.
Nah, you want to get the updated version, the Fiio E70K. Same price, better sound.
Oh god yeah, your daily condition can impact the love for your gear so hard. One day you love it, one day you hate it, back and forth. Today too little bass, tomorrow too much.
I still wanna spring for the O2+ODAC combo at one point, just to have reference gear.
Hello again HeadphoneGAF. Sorry to interrupt your discussion (which is interesting to read) but my girlfriend is looking for some headphones so I'm looking for some advice.
She wants some closed ear headphones under $100 that are noise cancelling (I know, I know). Because it will be used with a laptop it needs to not need much to drive it. Suggestions?
Really, do you know about the noise cancelling? Because if you did, you'd have talked her out of it. You know how mp3 works? Masking noise? The idea is that your ear is literally unable to hear something that's a lot more quiet than the loudest thing you hear. Transfer this to most settings where you're listening to music, outside of a mall or a tram or bus, and your music will actually noise-cancel for you. Get some closed ones and the isolation is even better. I'd recommend against it, as below $100 and noise cancelling is a risky business. I know some just don't cancel anything.
Anyway, I did pick up some Pioneer SE-NC70S at an airport on my way home from my last long flight. They're, what, 50$? 70$? They're lopsided to the bass, in my view, and lack a bit in the top, but they're flat lop-sided, which still is much better than the Beat By Dre, as a comparison, because they just poop out bass and don't give a shit how unflat the frequency response graph is.
The noise-cancelling worked fantastic on my flight home, so I can really recommend them for an air travel set. They actually sound OK, which is also a complete gamble in this budget range. As I said, it's too heavy on the bass and falls short on the highs, but it's a comfortable bass, so it sits nice. The fact that it's not completely overdoing the mids or something is what makes these somewhat good.
That's about what I know about noise cancelling headphones. Other than the fact that they'll forever alter my music, and I'll be staying away from them. I mean, I love them for airplanes, but nothing else.
Ok, so for under $100 what am I looking at with those same specs (sans noise cancelling)?
Any suggestions for a pair of IEMs in the $50 dollar range? I'd be using them for general audio on my laptop and a bit of music (mostly classic rock) on my phone.
I'm hoping for a few closed headphone recommendations for an upcoming trip involving 14-hour plane rides. My usual headphones are quarter modded Grado SR-60s from 2004 or so, and I absolutely love the Grado sound - enough to have them repaired when the cable's Y broke a couple of years ago. Unfortunately, they let in too much noise for such a long plane ride, so I need something else - and since it's been so long since I bought myself headphones, I'm willing to go up to $200 or so.
In the time I've been using my SR-60s, I've bought my brother two pairs of closed headphones (since I'm into this stuff and he isn't, he lets me handle his listening hardware): ATH-A700s and ATH-M50s. I like both of these, but not nearly as much as my (cheaper) Grados, which seem to me to have better instrument separation and soundstage and even better bass (I know that sounds crazy). I haven't listened to the A700s in a while - he broke them, and I fixed them by soldering on another plug, and then they were too "ugly" and he wanted something else - but I got a chance to listen to the M50s when I visited him this past weekend. They sounded dark and muddy compared to my bright, open Grados. I had a pair of Sony MDR-D22s (the cheaper Eggos) that were alright before the cables frayed, but kind of puny if not exactly tinny.
I had been planning on getting a pair of M50s for myself, but now that I've heard them I'm really looking for other options. What I'd love to do is get a higher-end Grado or try out some Sennheiser HD595/HD598s, but I really need closed cans for this trip around the world. When I'm at home I use a Fiio E10 DAC/amp but I don't have a portable amp.
Any ideas?