Didn't we just had a case where a woman called for help and then the police came and took shots at her daughter and killed the dog or something?This shit is enough for anyone to think twice before calling the police for help.
That's a crazy fucking number. Like holy shit. Did a quick search online and there have been around 70 people killed by police in the UK since the 1920's. Like, less than 10% of the number the US has had in the past 10 months. That's so insane.
Can someone please explain why is police in USA so trigger-happy? 780 people killed by police in just one year (not even whole year) is just crazy. If the police really have to shoot, can't they just shoot the suspect in the legs or arms - just to disarm the person but not outright kill him or her?
The only thing silly is to still trot out this argument like it means anything.Don't be silly now. Don't judge the entire police force of probably hundreds of thousands of officers (?) on the actions of a fraction of one percent.
I would not feel safe calling the police if I was American
Don't be silly now. Don't judge the entire police force of probably hundreds of thousands of officers (?) on the actions of a fraction of one percent.
We're assuming its one shot. Most of the time the police shoot someone they seem to just unload. Wouldn't be surprised if this poor guy was shit seven or eight times.My guess is that it's all coming from the gun culture. As there are so many guns out there there is a big chance that the person a cop faces at some point is armed. So cops are trained to shoot at the smallest reaction from the other side.
What's baffling me is that it's too often a deadly shot. Why not try to shoot just to injure? Maybe because it's easy to hit the area where a shot becomes lethal?
I would not feel safe calling the police if I was American
We're assuming its one shot. Most of the time the police shoot someone they seem to just unload. Wouldn't be surprised if this poor guy was shit seven or eight times.
We're assuming its one shot. Most of the time the police shoot someone they seem to just unload. Wouldn't be surprised if this poor guy was shit seven or eight times.
That would be even worse. Any more than one-two shots should invalidate the argument of self defense.
Don't be silly now. Don't judge the entire police force of probably hundreds of thousands of officers (?) on the actions of a fraction of one percent.
I'd be the officer said nothing, never announced himself, just shot a bloke who he saw in the dark holding something - that something could be debatable.
Tha's how I see it.So a black man is parked on the road side in a broken down car at night
Along comes a police man in plain clothes in an unmarked car, and the end result is he dies
I'd put money on the 'officer' who'd look like any random person not an officer, pulled up behind the car and got out
Jones who's in the dark at 3am, sees a car pull up and someone get out who isn't a tow truck, he probably picked up a tyre iron, or perhaps the supposed gun he owned and exited the vehicle (unless he was already out taking a leak, examining the engine etc)
The officer as standard practice probably approached gun drawn, with a flash light
Jones 'appears' from the dark and the officer reacts by shooting instinctively
I'd be the officer said nothing, never announced himself, just shot a bloke who he saw in the dark holding something - that something could be debatable.
I can't think of a situation where a plain clothes officer approached and followed procedure that resulted in a shooting, the only way it makes sense is if the cop was trigger happy in the dark and shot first
Didn't we just had a case where a woman called for help and then the police came and took shots at her daughter and killed the dog or something
Yes, police shoot and kill dogs. Restrain your dogs when police are called. Usually, an officer will knock and if there is a dog will tell you to restrain the dog before entering. If you don't, and your dog charges at an officer, the dog will be put down.
The only thing silly is to still trot out this argument like it means anything.
this is such a tired argument. But, let's address it yet again. The police in this country are allowed to operate in a protective bubble and overwhelmingly go unpunished or regulated when they screw up. this isn't just about the actions of a single officer. it's about the actions of the officers and culture that surround them, especially after they break the law. there is a large problem that needs fixing and judging the police in their entirety is justified.
Don't be silly now. Don't judge the entire police force of probably hundreds of thousands of officers (?) on the actions of a fraction of one percent.
But this line of thinking only works if you ignore all of the good things police do: stopping crimes, arresting criminals, protecting people, resolving situations and so on. I know it grabs headlines to report when they do something wrong, or shoot the wrong person (and I'm not defending that at all!), but I'm sure they good the police force does for individuals and for society at large far outweighs the bad things. To blanket call them "scum" and compare them to a criminal gang is just fucking stupid.
I can't wait to read this thread when it gets bumped 7 months from now with a not guilty verdict.
I blame the good cops at least partially for not speaking up.
Why isn't the police force equally outraged as we are by these things?
Why aren't cops demanding better training? Why aren't cops speaking up against racism in the police force? Why aren't cops speaking their mind about gun culture and the lack of gun control which creates a much more dangerous work environment for them?
Sometimes I don't feel like giving them the benefit of the doubt and buying into the "just a few bad apples" narrative, because I don't hear the good apples condemning the bad apples.
People don't ignore those things though. Police, nurses, firemen etc all get credit for the good work they do, and are generally greatly respected (although their pay oftentimes isn't worth the work they do). But at the end of the day, it's their job. People shouldn't expect to be praised every time they do their job correctly, but they can sure as hell expect to be called out when their poor behaviour results in someone getting killed. Like, it's not as if this was an accident or anything. The officer wasn't aiming to shoot a rabid coyote and missed. He purposely shot this guy for whatever reason, and rightfully deserves to be legally punished for that. It's good that this stuff makes the headlines because it forces people, and the police system as a whole, to take accountability for their actions.
There vast majority of people within the police force are probably good, honest people who want to do their part to make their society a safer and friendlier place to live, perhaps even this particular officer. That doesn't change the fact that the royally fucked up though, and the fact that police shootings are so insanely high in the US points to a problem with the system more than the individuals. So I get what you mean that people shouldn't label all cops as thugs or whatever, but it's so hard not to make judgements like that when there is a very clear problem with the system as a whole and not enough of the good cops are speaking out to help improve things.
But this line of thinking only works if you ignore all of the good things police do: stopping crimes, arresting criminals, protecting people, resolving situations and so on. I know it grabs headlines to report when they do something wrong, or shoot the wrong person (and I'm not defending that at all!), but I'm sure they good the police force does for individuals and for society at large far outweighs the bad things. To blanket call them "scum" and compare them to a criminal gang is just fucking stupid.
No that line of thinking works if you actually DO thinking and are thereby able to differentiate between "cops" as in the institution, system, what have you - and literally every member of law enforcement in the US. Not to mention the "good" is literally their job.But this line of thinking only works if you ignore all of the good things police do: stopping crimes, arresting criminals, protecting people, resolving situations and so on. I know it grabs headlines to report when they do something wrong, or shoot the wrong person (and I'm not defending that at all!), but I'm sure they good the police force does for individuals and for society at large far outweighs the bad things. To blanket call them "scum" and compare them to a criminal gang is just fucking stupid.
No that line of thinking works if you actually DO thinking and are thereby able to differentiate between "cops" as in the institution, system, what have you - and literally every member of law enforcement in the US. Not to mention the "good" is literally their job.
Just because the people screaming #notallcops at the top of their lungs are unable (or unwilling) to make that distinction doesn't mean the rest of us are. So take your poor and tired attempt to obfuscate somewhere else please.
Why is it stupid? List your criteria of criminal gangs and we go from there.I'm not obfuscating anything - merely trying to suggest why comparing them to a criminal gang is stupid. I don't defend or condone their trigger-happy bullshit and, being from the UK, I find the gun culture of America utterly terrifying.
I already added it before this thread.Another one for the __________ While Black list I guess.
Why?
If you legitimately fear for your life, you shoot until the threat is incapacitated.
Alright there, calm down kid.American police are some of the worst scum on this earth
I'd have more respect for some organized criminal gangs
..RIP.NBC affiliate news story
Absolutely heartbreaking. He worked as a property manager at a local Housing Authority and his boss says that "he was very aware of how to handle police because of the job he did."