WeAreStarStuff
Member
I'm honestly surprised there has not been more retaliatory violence against the police.
Oh, do fuck off. I'm done with this conversation.
Too bad, you seemed to be so knowledgable and informed about the topic.Oh, do fuck off. I'm done with this conversation.
I'm not obfuscating anything - merely trying to suggest why comparing them to a criminal gang is stupid. I don't defend or condone their trigger-happy bullshit and, being from the UK, I find the gun culture of America utterly terrifying.
Plain clothes and unmarked car, so I don't think he realized it was a cop.
classy.
Too bad, you seemed to be so knowledgable and informed about the topic.
Fact is, American police exhibits a lot of the behaviour commonly associated with gangs, like obstuction of investigation, promotion of war and conflict, gun culture and treating a profession and the collegues like a surrogate family.
I appreciate your answer to my question though. All class.
Also I appreciate the irony in someone named 'triggerhappytel' in condemning "trigger-happy bullshit'.
Can someone please explain why is police in USA so trigger-happy? 780 people killed by police in just one year (not even whole year) is just crazy. If the police really have to shoot, can't they just shoot the suspect in the legs or arms - just to disarm the person but not outright kill him or her?
It's almost like my user name on a public forum has nothing to do with my morals or beliefs! If you must know, it's based on a character from a videogame I liked when I was a kid.
Sometimes they're a necessity to catch some criminals red handed thoughThis. I hate plan clothes cops. They can assault you and if you dare defend yourself as any normal human would you're in trouble. It's like you're supposed to be a mind reader that they're a cop.
Sometimes they're a necessity to catch some criminals red handed though
Can someone please explain why is police in USA so trigger-happy? 780 people killed by police in just one year (not even whole year) is just crazy. If the police really have to shoot, can't they just shoot the suspect in the legs or arms - just to disarm the person but not outright kill him or her?
Some of the police are decent people, others are pieces of shit no better than the criminals they're supposed to be going after only they went a slightly different way in life. And unlike the criminals there's almost no accountability for crimes committed by cops and they know that.
I understand the point you're trying to make (don't agree with it), but if you're going to try to defend this viewpoint, it's best not to essentially say "because it's stupid" as your argument for why the contrasting viewpoint is flawed and then just attempt to exit the conversation.
My guess is that it's all coming from the gun culture. As there are so many guns out there there is a big chance that the person a cop faces at some point is armed. So cops are trained to shoot at the smallest reaction from the other side.
What's baffling me is that it's too often a deadly shot. Why not try to shoot just to injure? Maybe because it's easy to hit the area where a shot becomes lethal?
I'm sure some are, but with 780 death's, aren't we way past the "some bad apples" defense on this?
I'm foolish in trying to defend anything about the US police force because - as has already been pointed out - I'm not American, have never been to America and I'm trying to equate my experience with English police against how they operate. My experience with the police force here has been nothing but positive but they don't use firearms or excessive force so there's no fear between civilians and the police, only (again, in my experience) respect.
I'm sure some are, but with 780 death's, aren't we way past the "some bad apples" defense on this?
There is no way to equate your experience with the UK police in a thread that mentions that over 700 citizens have been killed this year alone in the US. There is the signal that things are different.I'm foolish in trying to defend anything about the US police force because - as has already been pointed out - I'm not American, have never been to America and I'm trying to equate my experience with English police against how they operate. My experience with the police force here has been nothing but positive but they don't use firearms or excessive force so there's no fear between civilians and the police, only (again, in my experience) respect.
You would think with the level of interviewing and stuff that police applicants go through, having to see a psychologist and whatever else, so many wouldn't fall through the cracks. It's either the hiring or the training that needs a rehaul. Possibly both.
I dont get the surprise, retaliation against the políce its only a common occurrence in the minds of bigots and paranoids, the police's war against minorities its a pretty one-sided afair.I'm honestly surprised there has not been more retaliatory violence against the police.
Has the Fox news smear campaign started yet?
I need to know if he deserved to die because he jaywalked fifteen years ago or something equally spurious.
I always hate the whole "a few rotten apples" spiel that way too many people love saying as they high five themselves in their batcave. Because news flash...you don't put the fucking rotten apples back in the bunch.
You would think with the level of interviewing and stuff that police applicants go through, having to see a psychologist and whatever else, so many wouldn't fall through the cracks. It's either the hiring or the training that needs a rehaul. Possibly both.
And everything else.You would think with the level of interviewing and stuff that police applicants go through, having to see a psychologist and whatever else, so many wouldn't fall through the cracks. It's either the hiring or the training that needs a rehaul. Possibly both.
Don't be silly now. Don't judge the entire police force of probably hundreds of thousands of officers (?) on the actions of a fraction of one percent.
Have you talked to any other cops about this? I assume not? Then how would you know how other cops feel about this.When the rest enable and are quick to jump to the defense of the murders and give them the benefit of the doubt automatically because of the color they're wearing they can and should be judged as well. That BS needs to stop. I've yet to see a situation where other cops see the same crap we see and their first reaction is to admit the other cop was in the wrong. There is always some excuse. When that culture stops then we can talk about possibly not judging cops as a whole.
Have you talked to any other cops about this? I assume not? Then how would you know how other cops feel about this.
I can't wait to hear about how Jones was chasing hulk hogans with sizzurp and smoking a fatty before turning into Super Negro right before the cop approached, which caused the cop to fear for his life.
But this line of thinking only works if you ignore all of the good things police do: stopping crimes, arresting criminals, protecting people, resolving situations and so on.
Have you talked to any other cops about this? I assume not? Then how would you know how other cops feel about this.
Sometimes they're a necessity to catch some criminals red handed though
lol..always.Hey, what did the black guy do wrong this time, Shadownet?
As the officer exited his vehicle, he was suddenly confronted by an armed subject, the police department said in a statement. As a result of the confrontation, the officer discharged his firearm, resulting in the death of the subject.
Hey, what did the black guy do wrong this time, Shadownet?
Not necessarily, because of the size of the police forces of some areas. NYPD has more than 34,000 uniformed officers, LAPD itself has over 10,000 officers. Put together as a total, you probably have more uniformed officers in the US than the entire militaries of some European countries.
What's baffling me is that it's too often a deadly shot. Why not try to shoot just to injure? Maybe because it's easy to hit the area where a shot becomes lethal?