For that people should understand that you shouldn't expect to receive as much from your health care as you are giving. People with pre existing conditions drive costs up for everyone but if you believe insurance is not only about mitigating risks but also making access fairer across the population it shouldn't be a problem.Pre existing condition shouldn't even be a thing, you need healthcare you should get healthcare. Should be as simple as that.
And people will still vote for them!
It's kind of hilarious without any laughter how literally EVERYTHING Republicans support boils down to: I'm going to use you, fuck you over, and kick you to the curb, then say you deserved it because you're a degenerate failure.
You have acne? What an awful American you are, unworthy of our God-blessed way of life. You should have your citizenship stripped and be ejected from the country. Don't move, I'm calling ICE right now.
Their psychology is entirely predicated on the methodology of a sociopathic abuser.
Transsexualism is a pre-existing condition that can get you denied for coverage? What the fuck is that?!
got a pre existing condition? It's your fault.
One good answer might come from a recent interview on the AHCA between Alabama's Representative Mo Brooks and CNN's Jake Tapper. ”[The plan] will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool," Brooks claimed. ”That helps offset all these costs, thereby reducing the cost to those people who lead good lives, they're healthy, they've done the things to keep their bodies healthy. And right now, those are the people—who've done things the right way—that are seeing their costs skyrocketing."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...sperity-gospel-of-american-health-care/525264
I can't tell if people in this thread are annoyed that pre-existing conditions are a thing at all, or whether it's just the fact that, like, acne is one of them that's annoying them. Cause it's not like people with cancer choose to have it or something.
I can't tell if people in this thread are annoyed that pre-existing conditions are a thing at all, or whether it's just the fact that, like, acne is one of them that's annoying them. Cause it's not like people with cancer choose to have it or something.
They aren't going to. Health care is for the rich, it's a luxury, not a right for these people.
Apparently the problem is that the GOP thinks that healthcare is pointless, after all, no one dies if they don't have healthcare (http://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...s-because-they-dont-have-access-to-healthcare) (I saw that clip on CNN too and was like "What?!" as well as everyone in the room he was giving that argument too. They were so stunned his argument worked to quiet them so he could leave (at least from the clip it looked like he was ready to exit right after that).
Apparently the problem is that the GOP thinks that healthcare is pointless, after all, no one dies if they don't have healthcare (http://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...s-because-they-dont-have-access-to-healthcare) (I saw that clip on CNN too and was like "What?!" as well as everyone in the room he was giving that argument too. They were so stunned his argument worked to quiet them so he could leave (at least from the clip it looked like he was ready to exit right after that).
Pregnancy? What the fuck?
Huh?
People are "annoyed" that people with pre-existing conditions, like the asthma I have, are placed in high risk pools and I have my insurance sky rocket. I've had it since I was born. Totally my fault.
And yes people are also annoyed about the silly things that are actually classified as pre-existing conditions under this bill like rape and C sections.
I clearly didn't write my post very well because you've garnered basically none of my point from it.
My point was that if you think the idea that pre-existing conditions that one has no control over shouldn't effect ones insurance, then whether it's acne or cancer or HIV or a genetic predisposition to strokes shouldn't matter - no one chooses a predisposition towards strokes just like you didn't choose to have asthma. So I was confused as to why people were specifically pointing out things like acne being included, as though that was ridiculous, when it's identical to almost everything else in being uncontrollable. I don't know why you're being snarky re: "totally my fault" when my exact point was that none of these things are anyone's fault (with a few exceptions).
Also, this bill doesn't classify rape as a pre-existing condition. Try diversifying your sources of information.
I get what you're saying now. Why be upset that acne is a PEC when Cancer is because neither is anybody's fault. I agree if you are coming from the view point that PEC shouldn't effect insurance anyway, which you never said you agree with that. But I can tell you that somebody with acne would care. Widening the pool of what classifies as a PEC means more people getting screwed over. Are these people not supposed to care because cancer patients are also PEC?
I think we should all care that any of them are. I understand the point - why would an insurance company charge someone who they're likely to have to spend hundreds of grand on the same as a fit and healthy 25 year old? - but there lies ruin. The Obamacare system of only allowing a few generalised factors like age and location is a good compromise - which is why it's weird to see people point out specific conditions.
Serious question. At what point does the general population decide to remove this govenment by any means neccesary? When is enough enough? The government has clearly failed the people. This should not be allowed.
pay tons of money for the ability to use a service as long as it's unlikely you will actually use what you paid for
If it seems like you would use it, then to hell with you
America
It's outrageous how this garbage even passed in the House.
My question is, if anyone can answer, is Congress and their staff exempt from AHCA? I read at first they were exempt from it and then another source saying they passed another bill that made it apply to themselves.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/...ongress-exemption-republican-health-bill.htmlBut in the end, none of that came to pass. A separate bill offered by Representative Martha E. McSally, Republican of Arizona, eliminated the congressional exemption from the House health plan. Her bill was overwhelmingly approved by the House meaning that Congress will live by the same health care rules as other Americans.
Don't worry, you'll be just fine if you're one of the non-lazy, healthy Americans with a full-time job that offers you insurance, oh wait...
Something something idle hands, devil's workshop, etc.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/li...th-bill-could-alter-employer-plans-1493890203
HahhahaI'll be sure to thank my family members who voted for Trump when I no longer have access to anxiety medication that I need to regulate my panic attacks by breaking my foot off in their asses.
pay tons of money for the ability to use a service as long as it's unlikely you will actually use what you paid for
If it seems like you would use it, then to hell with you
America
Evil fuckers!
Remember these faces
Less people alive = less opposition
It really is comic book levels of evil
we're going to get to the point where being born will be considered a pre existing condition
The people that voted for this are traitors to the American public. I don't care if they figured it would change some or not.
So I should only plan on living another 10 years.
Well alright then.
edit: also had kidney stones ONCE, about 10 years ago.
- Robin Beaton found out last June she had an aggressive form of breast cancer and needed surgery -- immediately.
Her insurance carrier precertified her for a double mastectomy and hospital stay. But three days before the operation, the insurance company called and told her they had red-flagged her chart and she would not be able to have her surgery.
The reason? In May 2008, Beaton had visited a dermatologist for acne. A word written on her chart was interpreted to mean precancerous, so the insurance company decided to launch an investigation into her medical history.
Beaton's dermatologist begged her insurance provider to go ahead with the surgery.
"He said, 'This is a misunderstanding. This is not precancerous. All she has is acne.' ... He said ,'Please don't hold up her cancer surgery for this,' " Beaton, 59, said as she testified at a House subcommittee hearing on the terminations of individual health policies by insurance companies.