The fact of how defensive you get to anyone trying to explain things in a logical manner...is all you need to know about yourself in regards to how you will sheepishly cling to what you believe.
Wow, big man throwing out the sheep insults. I'd better be on my A-game, as I'm clearly dealing with a superior intellect here!
Some general observations:
1. Your explanations aren't convincing.
2. Bokeh isn't some sort of gnostic art that only mystic sages--
or better yet, NeoGAF blowhards--understand.
Shocking!
3. Some of the posts after your Bokeh Bonanza were essentially, "HURRRRRR DEEE DURRRRR, THE NAVY IS FULL OF DUM DUMS!" Because we all know, there's not one smart person in the entire Navy,
no sireee!
4. The sheer amount of stuff coming out now, by credible witnesses, is starting to make typical hand-waving and goal post moving even more desperate.
5. The idea that these things are drones from China or Russia doesn't pass the sniff test, but don't tell that to people in this thread that say
brilliant things like,
"they don't scream alien to me."
6. It has been stated repeatedly that there are other pics and videos of the triangle crafts coming in the report to Congress in June.
I don't personally like Corbell, but that's what we've got until June.
They have it on visual.
Then show us more then blurry out of focus images that can easily be explained away as light refractions or bokeh effects.
They have it on radar.
Then release the radar data and let us break it down ourselves
Ladies and gentleman, Shadowplay. The man who understands bokeh, doesn't think military officials, intelligence officials and fighter pilots know a goddamn thing, and absolutely cannot understand how something that moves so fucking fast and disappears in a second might be hard to capture on video.
I guess there's the report due to Congress in June, but I'm sure that won't be good enough for you, either.