The point of this thread is to provide information for those that want it, with as much accuracy as possible. The details of exactly what's going on aren't important to everyone (or even a majority, I suspect), but there's probably someone out there to whom they are. Just as you want more details for official support (see below), others may want details for Boost Mode. I'm trying to serve disparate interests, so the end result may not perfectly match your ideal. I hope it's easy enough to ignore the stuff you don't care about, and find the stuff you do.
I think I've been extremely clear that what I post is always subject to errors and omissions, and repeatedly say that I welcome corrections and additions from other people. If there's something I've missed or gotten wrong, please tell me.
Certainly some terminology used to describe variations in game imagery is unfamiliar to members of the audience. Nevertheless, those terms are common because they're usefully precise, so I utilize them as well. This is why the OP encourages questions about jargon, and as it says I'm happy to explain anything as best I understand.
As for thoroughness, I do strive to be as complete as possible within the space I have. I understand the value that greater detail would have, but I'm not really in a position to provide it. For one, expanded textual notes on every game would likely already have exceeded the post size limits of GAF, or would do so in the near future. For another, it would be redundant in many cases; lengthy analysis is available elsewhere on lots of the highest-profile games, which is why I have external links at the top of the OP.
And finally--while I know this is something of a copout--maintaining this thread is not my day job. Keeping completely up-to-date on every technical detail is not possible given the amount of time I'm willing to spend, for which I can only beg patience and forgiveness. I have often had to revise entries when new, more justified details come out, but this may not occur instantly. That said, I do think I've done a pretty good job in this respect...or at least, there hasn't been an avalanche of refutation and dissent.
I welcome your (and anyone else's) comments, corrections, and suggestions. The thread can only be improved as more people contribute. But in the end, I have to follow the personal decisions about collation and revision that I think most conducive to good results.