• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

All Tattooed Women are Whores (my new favorite blog)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tesseract

Banned
I don't like something. I had better not just leave it at that though. No, instead I should construct some crudely fashioned argument as to how that something is universally bad, because my thoughts and opinions on any one subject should be held in much higher regard than the thoughts of others. I don't need empathy because I know that I'm always right. I should make a blog so that others can be illuminated by my perfect, infallible mind.

punch the keys for god's sake! yes! yes! you're the man now timedog!

you should post this in the blitzer thread for laughs and supreme superiority.
 

Ezalc

Member
tumblr_lnxsfl8DQ41qdvwsno1_500.jpg

A lady in the streets, a freak in the sheets. C'mon now son.

Also, don't care much for tattoos. Sometimes they're hot sometimes they're not. Most often I don't like them, but that's just an aesthetic thing. Don't really give a fuck whether somebody has one or not.
 

Doomsayer

Member
I refuse to believe someone actually thinks this.

Satire...please?

I have an affinity for women with tattoos... I can't help it. :(
 
So
bad tattoos = bad
good tattoos = good
Got it.
That is the gist.

EDIT: The only complication to that is everyone has their own threshold for what is and isn't an ok tattoo. For some people that means any tattoo and that's fine. For me though, a good tattoo can make a hot girl hotter. Tastes. We all have them.
 

Everdred

Member
A lady in the streets, a freak in the sheets. C'mon now son.

Also, don't care much for tattoos. Sometimes they're hot sometimes they're not. Most often I don't like them, but that's just an aesthetic thing. Don't really give a fuck whether somebody has one or not.
Ludacris lyrics... C'mon son.
 

Doomsayer

Member
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.

lol.

I know Doctors, Dentists, Nurses, etc.. with tattoos. I don't see the problem with "long term" thinking when people are plenty successful with them. Just an old-fashioned mentality, I guess, tats are becoming much more widely accepted socially and in business.
 
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.

Determining that someone lacks long-term thinking because of a tattoo=unreasonable, and really no basis for it. Tattoos get ugly when you grow elderly? Generally, so do people.

It's really a shame society doesn't accept tattoos, at least professionally. There is no basis for it.
 
Mmmm. I get where he's coming from but no. Not really.

To a degree it does. One of my best friends from HS has a father who's a tattoo artist. Many people get whatever they think looks cool at the time. Obviously, something more meaningful is excluded, but yeah, lots of people go with the cool thing at the time and they end up regretting it later.

Determining that someone lacks long-term thinking because of a tattoo=unreasonable, and really no basis for it. Tattoos get ugly when you grow elderly? Generally, so do people.

It's really a shame society doesn't accept tattoos, at least professionally. There is no basis for it.

Now you have two things that are getting ugly, one just being a blemish that's expensive to remove, and that you would likely look better without at that point.
 
Determining that someone lacks long-term thinking because of a tattoo=unreasonable, and really no basis for it. Tattoos get ugly when you grow elderly? Generally, so do people.

It's really a shame society doesn't accept tattoos, at least professionally. There is no basis for it.
That is not what he said. Suggests != displays.
 
To a degree it does. One of my best friends from HS has a father who's a tattoo artist. Many people get whatever they think looks cool at the time. Obviously, something more meaningful is excluded, but yeah, lots of people go with the cool thing at the time and they end up regretting it later.
That is a specific situation. Getting a bad tattoo with no thought towards it shows a lack of long term thinking (surprise surprise!). Judging all tattoos that way (ie the way that comment does) is unfair.

That is not what he said. Suggests != displays.
That is mighty presumptive of the person though isn't it?
 

bigf00t

Member
I'm not a fan of tattoos on either sex, and I've never understood the idea of "meaningful" tattoos.

Of course, everyone has their own standard for when an event in their life is considered meaningful enough to warrant a permanent place on their body, but I think it's getting a bit ridiculous. When people get tattoos ostensibly for relatively minor events, it starts to feel like just an excuse. They wanted a tattoo, but didn't want to be seen as jumping on the band wagon, so had to come up with a reason, flimsy or not.

Maybe I just don't understand the need to emblazon your life story on your body. Are you going to forget key moments of your life without an inked reminder? By the time you're old enough that you can't remember your own life, your tattoos will be wrinkled and indecipherable.
 

Riposte

Member
I think tattoos are quite ugly most of the time (it is only the really eye-catching, non-tacky ones that seem worthwhile - particularly on people who are not trying to be "typically attractive", e.g. hard-ass Yakuza bosses with fancy full body tattoos) and I mainly dislike the "lower back" kind. Even putting aside the nagging negative image you'd have to put up with going that route, why get a tattoo in a place you can't possibly see without a mirror? That's pretty judgmental of me I guess. It is just all so tacky. Like, frat-boy tacky.

Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.

Maybe a little too reasonable.
 
Some people get tattoos like people posting on a forum. Can be really shitty and will be shitty about 80-90% of the time.


My parents have tattoos. I believe they are all fucking awesome. But they think about them for months, even years, before getting them. That's good tattoo edicate. Still, some people get shit tattoos, just like some people buy a Pollick painting for more than $20. Real life people.
 
I think tattoos are quite ugly most of the time (it is only the really eye-catching, non-tacky ones that seem worthwhile - particularly on people who are not trying to be "typically attractive", e.g. hard-ass Yakuza bosses with fancy full body tattoos) and I mainly dislike the "lower back" kind. Even putting aside the nagging negative image you'd have to put up with going that route, why get a tattoo in a place you can't possibly see without a mirror? That's pretty judgmental of me I guess. It is just all so tacky. Like, frat-boy tacky.

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom