GuitarAtomik
Member
Women with bad tattoos look trashy, but women with decent to good tattoos are extra hot. That is all.
I'm hoping what you need here is a sarcasm font.
are you sure? for someone without a fedora that post sure did display lots of fedora-logic.
the universal anecdotal evidence
I don't like something. I had better not just leave it at that though. No, instead I should construct some crudely fashioned argument as to how that something is universally bad, because my thoughts and opinions on any one subject should be held in much higher regard than the thoughts of others. I don't need empathy because I know that I'm always right. I should make a blog so that others can be illuminated by my perfect, infallible mind.
It's not my fault GAF is so backwards it doesn't have sarcasm tags
When are we truly going to evolve as a global society, reach the pinnacle of human society, and invent a sarcasm font?
When are we truly going to evolve as a global society, reach the pinnacle of human society, and invent a sarcasm font?
There are ad hod sarcasm makers. None use them.When are we truly going to evolve as a global society, reach the pinnacle of human society, and invent a sarcasm font?
We already have it. It's called italics.
Not universally, people use italics to mean other things, like emphasis. I'm imagining a third thing, like...i don't know, sharper letters? Can't we get bold, italics, underline, and italics? Is that too much to ask?
I refuse to believe someone actually thinks this.
Satire...please?
I have an affinity for women with tattoos... I can't help it.
comic sans?
wait.... what's people?
I hope I'm not eating people.
YES! The solution is now people!
i hate name tatoos. on anyone.
you're not an object to be labeled.
Women with bad tattoos look trashy, but women with decent to good tattoos are extra hot. That is all.
I know it's a complicated formula.So
bad tattoos = bad
good tattoos = good
Got it.
Why? People often get deceased loved ones names tatted on themselves.
So
bad tattoos = bad
good tattoos = good
Got it.
The fact that women with tattoos and piercings are exceptionally easy to conquer sexually with minimal effort...
That is the gist.So
bad tattoos = bad
good tattoos = good
Got it.
comic sans?
YES! The solution is now, people!
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.
The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment are great!Figures someone who likes Russian lit would be a nutcase.
Ludacris lyrics... C'mon son.A lady in the streets, a freak in the sheets. C'mon now son.
Also, don't care much for tattoos. Sometimes they're hot sometimes they're not. Most often I don't like them, but that's just an aesthetic thing. Don't really give a fuck whether somebody has one or not.
Well, your brother, Karamazov happens to be old-fashioned at the age of 23
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.
Mmmm. I get where he's coming from but no. Not really.Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.
Mmmm. I get where he's coming from but no. Not really.
Determining that someone lacks long-term thinking because of a tattoo=unreasonable, and really no basis for it. Tattoos get ugly when you grow elderly? Generally, so do people.
It's really a shame society doesn't accept tattoos, at least professionally. There is no basis for it.
That is not what he said. Suggests != displays.Determining that someone lacks long-term thinking because of a tattoo=unreasonable, and really no basis for it. Tattoos get ugly when you grow elderly? Generally, so do people.
It's really a shame society doesn't accept tattoos, at least professionally. There is no basis for it.
That is a specific situation. Getting a bad tattoo with no thought towards it shows a lack of long term thinking (surprise surprise!). Judging all tattoos that way (ie the way that comment does) is unfair.To a degree it does. One of my best friends from HS has a father who's a tattoo artist. Many people get whatever they think looks cool at the time. Obviously, something more meaningful is excluded, but yeah, lots of people go with the cool thing at the time and they end up regretting it later.
That is mighty presumptive of the person though isn't it?That is not what he said. Suggests != displays.
Yet an "agape" tramp stamp or belly tatt
gives a completely different meaning
Opiate shouldn't have been included in that post. His position was reasonable.
I think tattoos are quite ugly most of the time (it is only the really eye-catching, non-tacky ones that seem worthwhile - particularly on people who are not trying to be "typically attractive", e.g. hard-ass Yakuza bosses with fancy full body tattoos) and I mainly dislike the "lower back" kind. Even putting aside the nagging negative image you'd have to put up with going that route, why get a tattoo in a place you can't possibly see without a mirror? That's pretty judgmental of me I guess. It is just all so tacky. Like, frat-boy tacky.