wccftech.com
I don't see why not. This should be tech agnostic. Would definitely work great for 60 -> 120fps, though arguably they should give the option to enable it for 30 -> 60 (or even better, framerate unlocked + VRR)
It´s actually the "honest" way of doing this compared to NVIDIA just not mentioning the latency issues such a tech brings with it.
nvidia are good at marketing their hardware for gimmick technologies, motion interpolation isnt new at all it was experimented even on xbox 360 days, what they are doing now is just reconstructing it to clean it upand reducing latency... remember nvidia has a history of fraud advertisement they even claimed they invented the gpu!... also claimed they invented realtime raytracing and was only possible on rtx hardware but later people found out you could use raytracing on older gpu's even ps4 and xbone had raytracing on crysis remastered + a couple of ps4 games used raytracing techniques like dreams.
Reading this was kind of disappointing. Especially if this was applied to current consoles where the hardware is already power starved.
DLSS3’s frame generation option works well below a native input of 60 FPS.
It's not all totally lies as you put it, dlss has a lower time cost than fsr on nvidia hardware with the tensor cores, so you do get the slightly better image upscale done slightly quicker. Thats why using dlss you normally get a few more fps than fsr, not a huge deal but technically the hardware solution is doing a better faster job than the software only solution.
I'm assuming, yes.
Because 30fps to 60fps doesn't provide enough "information" and comes out looking weird and jittery, you want to see how bad it is look up some examples on PC, Sack Boys Little Big Adventure is currently broke on PC where it always enables Nvidias DLSS3 and that game is capped to 60fps in places, so due to the bug the game is rendering 30fps and "upscaling" to 60fps and it just looks a mess.
See above.
Let's hope not. FSR2 is already responsible for ruining quality in some consoles games....
im not arguing if it works well, any interpolation below 60 is problematic since you have less frames to sample from.. The problem is nvidia's old school marketing where they claim anything theyve done is only special because of their hardware..
Is this a stealth blame someone else for forspoken post ?
dlss might be quicker than fs3 thats ok and granted but the bs that nvidia claim is olways overhyped pr... to sell their 2000$ laptop sized gpu's... they need to find a reason for consumers to spend ridiculous amount of money on their products and propaganda is part of it... claiming raytracing was invented by rtx and oonly possible because of tensor cores and such and such is just music to y ears. Basically nvidia gpu's have an edge in performance than amd but please there hardware isnt a neccessity to implement certain features.
What console games are using FSR2.2? Most are using FSR1.
what?
Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk are 2.1, and I think Scorn was the first with 2.0.
I wonder why they've not been updated to 2.2, that one reduced ghosting a lot.
It's not required, it's recommended. With framerate lower than 60 you will get very noticeable input latency.
I agree that 60 should be the baseline, but some people preferred 30 to 60 to "clean" 30 fps in some games when LTT made the comparison a while ago. I'm not sure it's a no-go for every game and the technology in general, which can still improve the same way FSR2 and DLSS2/3 have done so far.
Do you think that it is something that amd and nvidia can fix with future patch or it's an intrinsic limit of this tech?
I didn’t find the ghosting too bad in Cyberpunk mainly because it only reared it’s head in specific spots like the lines in the cement at the crosswalks causing people to ghost, and other things moving across really specific patterns.
It's like resolution, the more you put in, the better the out result will be, DLSS3 was intended for high frame rates, mainly to hit that 4k120 line, so the higher the number in, the closer to native the "fake" will be.
I know, but it will likely degrade image quality and add artifacts beyond that.
What the fuck are you smoking? Ray Tracing was around for ages. It is a blatantly obvious use of physics. Wikipedia says the first demon on a computer was from 1968. NVidia developed the first commercial HW accelerator for RT. I could always be run on older GPUs. It just runs like shit. The only one committing 'fraud' here is you with this insanity.
I use it all the time on my PC. Free frames and I don’t see the image quality hit. I plat at 4k tho
60 fps for inputSo 60 fps is the new standard?
. Ideally you want to input 60fps, pass through FSR 3.0 and use the interpolation data to make more accurate motion blur at 30fps.…
they said they invented the first realtime rt capable gpu... but raytracing was already done on ps4 with games like dreams and the tomorrow children even crysis remastered has raytracing on ps4 and xbox one which use gpu's from 2013... so it was all a pr lie
recommended not impossible... motion interpolation at 30 fps is alright on racing games ive tried it on horizon 5 on tv and it looks alright only noticable when you spin the camera though
