AMD FSR Redstone uses machine learning to achieve parity with Nvidia DLSS
- Thread starter IbizaPocholo
- Start date
- Hardware
They are not exactly "technical" without any offence. I will avoid childish race about winners and loser.
Last edited:
You already have a long discussion with another person about your approach with the PSSR "analysis" eh.
winjer
Member
Can you post an analysis of any of these upscalers that is technical?
No one can. For now. Outside create a tools. Maybe helped with AI.
Last edited:
winjer
Member
So you are just trolling....
Jesus. You really can't resist with this stupid member war right? Can you tell me what the hell of concrete tech data is present in Bonji videos or any others video comparison about such stuff on the net? It's not even easy to spot resolution on DRS with the tools. Imagine measure the quality of the upscaler.
Last edited:
Miyazaki’s Slave
Gold Member
We disagree here. I have played Shadows, Spider-Man 2, both the horizon games, GoW:Ragnarock, and Enotria. None of these games are in par imo. There may be titles that I have not played (oblivion remaster for example) that match or are on par but if the ones I have tested at least are not.
Asscreed and Spider-Man 2 have awful motion artifacting, again, I will leave room for "bro you don't have your settings tweaked" but if I can start both games, set them to ultra (or that games equivalent) and they perform great with Nvidia with no tweaking then I would like the same for AMD.
I am personally heavily invested in AMD (or even intel for what matter with their upcoming releases on the Ai side) matching/outpacing team green, that day cannot get here quick enough.
winjer
Member
On that video, we have direct comparisons between these upscalers with zoom in picture, slowdowns and frame by frame analysis. It shows every defect that each tech has.
But somehow you think this is not enough. But that your friends that saw some issues is a reliable source. But then you contradict yourself by stating there is no way to test this and we need some magical specialized AI tool, that doesn't exist.
No I told you this is not tech data. You haven't understand anything of what I'm trying to argue. I remind similar stuff in the recent long discussion we have where you claimed Cerny admitted the ps5 pro hardware memory/bandwith troubling him which isn't it what he tried to argue in the conference about it. I guess it's an habit to misleading the others words.
Last edited:
winjer
Member
Then show us that tech data...
Tech data it's make videos with slowdowns and zoom comparison. Ok. We have to thanks DF to spread such convintion.
Last edited:
winjer
Member
I'm starting to think that the "tech analysis" that you want is only things that say that the Pro and PSSR are the best things ever.
I'm starting to think the only discussion you want to have it's only where you appear the more expert of the other. I never make a single post where I claimed Pro or PSSR are the best in something. Differently to you and many others.
Anyway I don't know if exist tools which analyse the precision of the AI upscaler maybe something about is part of the development kit of such upscalers, I wouldn't know.
Last edited:
GigaBowser
The bear of bad news
Bojji
Member
And DLSS won that discussion.
So far I haven't seen anything suggesting PSSR reaching DLSS3 quality, not personally in games, not in YT videos and not on this forum.
So in your opinion, is PSSR as good as DLSS3?
You seem really obsessed with this research of a winner and loser eh. Personally I think PSSR it's better in motion, speaking of details clarity and DLSS3 in AA/denoising. But again it's just based to simple eyes spot not tools measurement or math percentage about artifacts or noises in the whole screen and the relative persistence in ms; I ignore if it's possible elaborate such stuff via algorithm.
Last edited:
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
This is true. 5070s and 5070 Tis can be had for reasonably close to MSRP.
At $599, the 9070XT is an easy recommend over the $750 5070 Ti and an absolute no brainer over the $850+
My local MC regularly gets $825 or less 5070 Tis and I havent seen a 9070XT under $750 since launch. At that price point, its a lot less obvious which to get, but I'd give a slight edge to nvidia given the better RT performance and more DLSS compatibility.
However, I have no issue saying that DLSS4 is no longer worth a price premium over FSR4.
Last edited:
It's even worse, I'm mostly seeing 9070XTs for $850-900. You can get a 5070ti for less.
The initial batch of cards had rebates directly to the stores from AMD to bring the price down to their MSRP. But since then they just let their partners price at whatever they want. With NVIDIA appearing weak this is the time to strike. AMD has made gains, but the April 2025 Steam Hardware Survey still lists NVIDIA at 74% with AMD at 17%. You need to go down to the 13th entry in most popular video cards to hit the first AMD entry, and it's embedded graphics on the CPU. It's 30th place until you hit the first AMD graphics card the 6600. That's right, 30th. And four of the spots before it are two AMD embedded, and two Intel embedded. Leaving 25 cards of the top 30 are all NVIDIA.
The 9070XT being a card that trades jabs with the 5070ti but not having all the advanced features NVIDIA gives, but costing 20% less? Go AMD unless you really need/want those extra features. But prices it 5-10% more than your competition? Why are people buying them?
Last edited: