• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AMD RX 6000 'Big Navi' GPU Event | 10/28/2020 @ 12PM EST/9AM PST/4PM UK

VFXVeteran

Banned
XsX does use direct x 12 ultimate, but the compute units of the XsX have been customized at the hardware level to accelerate ray tracing.

The questions is, do these new cards have hardware level ray tracing via:

1) modified compute units
2) dedicated RT cores

I dont know the answer

The fanboys don't care. They only see the rasterization benchmarks and are claiming victory over a few FPS.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
Guys I told you Su Bae gonna deliver you fucking laughed who's laughing now that's right my bae and team red with their talented engineers yeah baby.
Fucking 3090 is cancelled, no refunds will be issued.
Stay mad and if you preordered a 3090 don't forget to ligma balls.

I have both an RTX 3080 and an RTX 3090 and I regret NOTHING. DLSS makes playing games at 4K with ray tracing enabled a viable option, and AMD's RX 6000 Series doesn't have an equivalent to it yet.

Furthermore, there are a dozen upcoming games that will feature ray tracing and DLSS.

 
And looking at the PS5 speed of 2.23Ghz and seeing that there's no RDNA2 6000 GPU with those game clocks, does that say those won't really be sustained? Highest game clocks are 2.04 in 6900XT

Yes. Just a remainder: 36 CU @ ~2Ghz = ~9.2TF

These are good cards for competitive PC gamers, with low latency focus and NV matching rasterization performance in not so graphically demanding high FPS multiplayer games.

However, I like playing graphically impressive games so good RT performance + DLSS 2.0 probably means that I'll go for 3080 instead.
 

reksveks

Member
These were real life benchmarks from games. Not synthethic benchmarks
yeah, but nice ones for them just like nvidia do in their presentations. Do we know if raytracing was enabled ? also without a good DLSS competitor, could one argue that you should be comparing DLSS Quality mode + 1440p native res vs AMD 4k native res mode if the image quality is the same?

I will wait for independent benchmarks.
 

smbu2000

Member
Great presentation! Looking forward to reviews of these cards. I wonder how their Ray Tracing implementation with DirectX Raytracing (DXR) will perform. Should be interesting to see after they launch.
 

VFXVeteran

Banned
How is that 3090 that you paid 700 dollars over market price for working out? I definitely expected you to be super positive on AMD in this thread. Can't think of a single reason why you wouldn't be! No correlation at all!

I want to see new tech in these boards. That means RT and DLSS and hardware cores. I saw none of that. With the increaase in RT coming, they missed the boat on that R&D. They tried to compensate with rasterization performance. They don't have enough there for me to praise.

And my 3090 is going fine. It will be the fastest RT board for the next few years.
 

Rickyiez

Member
Good competition for us consumers . I'm good with my 3080 though , next gen of GPU will be very interesting then .
 
Cringe. What kind of comparison is that?
It's more like comparing a C8 Corvette to a Porsche 911.
Have you ever seen comparisons with raytracing, having DLSS on vs off when it comes to framerate? If you haven't, please look it up, as there's a world of a difference in framerates. This is what will decide which GPU will be relevant in the future.
 

cucuchu

Member
I have both an RTX 3080 and an RTX 3090 and I regret NOTHING. DLSS makes playing games at 4K with ray tracing enabled a viable option, and AMD's RX 6000 Series doesn't have an equivalent to it yet.

Furthermore, there are a dozen upcoming games that will feature ray tracing and DLSS.


Exactly this. Although if I didn't have a 3080, I wouldn't hesitate to buy a 6800XT if no 3080's were available (assuming 6800XT's are actually supplied better than the 3080's).

People are touting a few FPS of raw performance in select games as a win for AMD, which it is in those specific cases, but DLSS is quite impressive so that leaves a lot for AMD to make up for when it comes to practical performance in games for years to come. The ray tracing argument has been beat to death, and some people can live without it, but if thats something important to you then AMD also has ground to make up for there too.

For 99% of PC gamers, both the 3080 and 6800XT are going to provide similarly amazing performance so you can't go wrong either way. I'm happy AMD is now competing with NVIDIA though and thats a win for everyone.
 
Last edited:

Bolivar687

Banned
Furthermore, there are a dozen upcoming games that will feature ray tracing and DLSS.


200.gif
 

Mister Wolf

Member
Have you ever seen comparisons with raytracing, having DLSS on vs off when it comes to framerate? If you haven't, please look it up, as there's a world of a difference in framerates. This is what will decide which GPU will be relevant in the future.

Yeah the real benchmark is how this thing will run Cyberpunk with every raytracing setting turned on to max. Thats the only comparison to the 3080/3090 that matters to me.
 

Bolivar687

Banned
AMD are tech wizards. 6900XT are 24 TFLOPS going up against 36 TFLOPS 3900.

I do think some of this is going to be dialed back when reviewers are testing this without Smart Access Memory or Rage Mode. They were clearly turned on to get some of these comparisons where they just edge out Nvidia.

Still, if there's no 3080s available on 11/18, then it's not really a choice at all.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
There's several thousand PC games released each year (literally), but because DLSS 2.0 is in 12 of them, pre-order cancelled AMD

And how many of those games are triple-A titles? The fact that Cyberpunk 2077 will support both RTX and DLSS is a sufficient reason by itself to choose the RTX 30 Series over the RX 6000 Series, as Cyberpunk 2077 will be the biggest game (both in terms of scope and hype) released this year and for some time to come. You won't be able to play that game with decent frame rates when RTX is enabled without DLSS or an equivalent to DLSS.
 

MarkyG

Member
Oooh. Glad I held off upgrading to a 3080. This might be the 2nd time I purchase an AMD GPU. Will see what real world benchmarks and reviews say. AMD are killin' it :)
 
Last edited:

Malakhov

Banned
And how many of those games are triple-A titles? The fact that Cyberpunk 2077 will support both RTX and DLSS is a sufficient reason by itself to choose the RTX 30 Series over the RX 6000 Series, as Cyberpunk 2077 will be the biggest game (both in terms of scope and hype) released this year and for some time to come. You won't be able to play that game with decent frame rates when RTX is enabled without DLSS or an equivalent to DLSS.
So how's that 3090 doing right now? Sold your 3080 yet?

:messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

Ascend

Member
Just as I thought.

1) No RT cores so basically the SMUs will do all the RT.
2) No hardware Tensor Cores for DLSS.

These cards will not last long this generation.
The BVH acceleration is integrated into the CU. It's not like the 5700XT that doesn't have any BVH acceleration. RT is hardware accelerated.
Obviously AMD is not going to have Tensor cores because that is nVidia technology. B

Why would anyone spend $1k for a board with 16G of VRAM vs. 24G and limited RT capabilities. You get what you pay for. I'll pay that extra $500 for that RT/DLSS/24G of RAM
For a Veteran, sometimes you really are stupid. Can't believe you of all people fall for this nonsense.

Always funny.
nVidia comes with new tech: YES, we must have it, just in case it is adopted. AMD is better value? Who cares, it doesn't have this underused tech!
AMD comes with new tech: Nothing uses it, not worth having. It's better to wait until it's fully adopted, and by that time, nVidia will have it anyway!
 

nani17

are in a big trouble
And how many of those games are triple-A titles? The fact that Cyberpunk 2077 will support both RTX and DLSS is a sufficient reason by itself to choose the RTX 30 Series over the RX 6000 Series, as Cyberpunk 2077 will be the biggest game (both in terms of scope and hype) released this year and for some time to come. You won't be able to play that game with decent frame rates when RTX is enabled without DLSS or an equivalent to DLSS.

It won't support AMD at launch as far as I know in terms of Ray tracing but will down the line
 

MiguelItUp

Member
Nice try. Your argument amounted to name calling. Called you on the stupidity. You reacted to my reasoned argument with memes. Typical attempt to gaslight.
....Alright? It wasn't meant to be an argument, never was. Maybe I was harsh with the name calling, but people say shit much worse than that here, lol. It wasn't directed towards anyone in particular. I reacted with a gif saying chill, because I wasn't starting an argument, clearly. Why would I respond with a wall of text, which I happen to be doing now, so I guess you got what you wanted, lol. It wasn't my objective. Never was or is. Clearly what I said hurt you or offended you, and that wasn't the point of it. A 36 year old gaslighter, yup! That's me. :pie_eyeroll:

Just ignore me if you need to, for whatever reason you have it out for me, and that's odd to me. Not a common thing. But whatever, not sure what your motive is, but have a good day.
 
Last edited:
Cyberpunk if it even comes out this year will probably have problems. I wouldnt bank on that alone being the reason for choosing your gpu right now.
 
this might be slightly off topic, but do AMD GPU have 'cores' the same way CPU's have cores? Are the cores in the GPU the compute units (not talking about NVIDIA tensa cores).

The RDNA 3 is rumored to use the chiplet design similar to the Zen architecture. So the potential for future AMD GPUs RDNA 3 based would be:

1) Using chiplet design connecting GPU cores with infinity fabric (interconnect between cores)
2) Infinity cache (128mb to lets say 256mb)
3) Faster memory (HBM or GDDR7?!)
4) Better and more efficient hardware acceleration of DLSS type feature and Raytracing?
 
Last edited:

notseqi

Gold Member
It's been non stop 3080 bashing and calling it a power hungry monster for weeks. I'm honestly disappointed 6800xt is that power hungry but I guess it had to be with those clockspeeds.
Be an AMD fan for a day. You have been arguing a lot against AMD the past few days. Not knocking you but I see your complaint and I don't care for it.
 

Entroyp

Member
There was not talk about hardware decompression engines (like Nvidia’s), just MS storage solutions which is software based. I was kind of disappointed by that.
 

SantaC

Member
I do think some of this is going to be dialed back when reviewers are testing this without Smart Access Memory or Rage Mode. They were clearly turned on to get some of these comparisons where they just edge out Nvidia.

Still, if there's no 3080s available on 11/18, then it's not really a choice at all.
The smart access memory gave like 3-13%. 6900XT will still be pretty close.
 

Evangelion Unit-01

Master Chief
6800XT looks like a nice card. $50 cheaper than 3080. I think the price of both cards speaks volumes to how AMD priced Nvidia down with the 5800 vs 2070/2080 last year.

6900 $500 cheaper than 3090 is big.

Good showing, PC builders have a lot of great choices.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom