They didn't have a problem adapting alcoholic womanizing Tony Stark or baby eating cousin fucking Hulk.
hell, petes been on screen with mj, and he did much worse to her
They didn't have a problem adapting alcoholic womanizing Tony Stark or baby eating cousin fucking Hulk.
hell, petes been on screen with mj, and he did much worse to her
Yeah that was stupid but I think what they portrayed with that scene is what they had planned for Ant-Man to do, wasn't it? Him accidentally hitting her out of frustration and not intending to?
I've looked a lot more into the Ant-Man thing and If that panel was the only thing and the intentions were messed up by the artist, I don't think it's fair that panel is held over him.
Yeah I think these were the ones I saw. Ultimate universe Pym is evil but none of those are his original character right?I find it hilarious just how much to an extreme Millar took it
Ultimate Pym is such a son of a bitch.
It's exacerbated by the fact that later writers decided to keep that thread going for some dumb reason. Now everybody makes jokes about hurr durr don't you have a wife to beat.
Yeah that was stupid but I think what they portrayed with that scene is what they had planned for Ant-Man to do, wasn't it? Him accidentally hitting her out of frustration and not intending to?
I've looked a lot more into the Ant-Man thing and If that panel was the only thing and the intentions were messed up by the artist, I don't think it's fair that panel is held over him.
Ah. Yeah the whole thing is just weird.he was having a psychotic break and lashed out. it could have been anyone in jans place, and it still would have happened. but he still has the "lol wifebeater" stigma behind him because writers following fumbled the ball to make it seem so much worse than it was. and noone really wanted to touch it after that, so it set.
They do it in 616 as well. Every now and then when one of the Avengers or somebody has a disagreement with him they'll throw it back in his face. And the writers chose to play it up by making his relationship with Janet get shittier and shittier as time went on.
Like? Or are we talking about Ultimate universe posted above?
Someone needs to do a palate cleanse series for Ant-Man like Fraction's Hawkeye or Ellis' Moon Knight.
hawkeye, his supposed friend threatening to come after him if he does it again, various characters throwing it in his face(like norman osborn and carol danvers, among others.)
its brought up quite a bit when hank is on panel. which is funny because with all the long histories of characters, and the countless things forgotten, its the only thing that sticks.
Ooohhhh I was meaning does he commit more abusive acts but it doesn't seem like he does so I don't understand why this one is held over him when it was an accident. Ultimate one is pure scum though.
hell, petes been on screen with mj, and he did much worse to her
And Slayven just recently put me on to what a piece of shit Hawkeye was to Mockingbird.
Damn, that's a callback.
That is a really unexpected callback.
lol wow, that is an obscure ass reference, would never have caught it if someone didn't point it out
Can someone explain for us who haven't been following Ant-Man?
And Slayven just recently put me on to what a piece of shit Hawkeye was to Mockingbird.
Yup. But shits always thrown on hanks doorstep.
It's the drink from the Incredible Hulk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehAkYxYze7M
Hm. Not sure how to take this.
On one hand, I would love if somehow Janet could come back young and still be the main Wasp but on the other hand, it would be awkward and I want some form of Wasp in the movie.
I'm really getting more and more annoyed with Edgar Wrights changes but we'll see if it turns out great or not.
I dunno if I'd call that obscure. It was a plot point in Incredible Hulk (and so far the only time Stan Lee has ever played a guy who directly effected the plot).
More surprised that they're making an, albeit small, reference to the Incredible Hulk which has been pretty much ignored and retconned ever since it came out
It hasn't been retconned except for the teaser at the end. Everything else is still valid.
I don't see that from Marvel. It's in the phase 1 boxset. There are direct references to it in Avengers and Agents of SHIELD.
Yeah, that's what I was referring to.
Of course, just to a lesser extent than all the other phase 1 movies. Things like none of the actors introduced in the film appearing in any other MCU movies, not releasing an 'Art of' book, and moving the spotlight away Norton's Banner as others have mentioned makes the film feel like a less significant entry into the MCU franchise.
"Ignored" was probably a bit strong on my part
Up until now, there hasn't been a good story reason for any of the actors from TIH to show up, IMO.
Since SHIELD is no longer around to keep the military off Banner's back, I wouldn't mind seeing a Ross cameo in Ultron, but I doubt they have the time.
is that dr stranges house in the set pics. I would love it if it was.
Yeah I really hope Ross shows up sometime too, William Hurt did a great job.
San FranciscoThey're in San Diego, aren't they? Maybe it's Pym's home.
It hasn't been retconned except for the teaser at the end. Everything else is still valid.
Teaser at the end? You mean the one hinting that Banner has the Hulk controlled?
Not quite retconned, since he was able to transform into the Hulk at will.
He's "always angry."
No. Stark talking to Ross.
Oh wow. I just finished Iron-Man 1, and is going to watch Incredible Hulk this weekend.
Its not reconned. There is a full canon Marvel One Shot of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oOE3mJcGtU
I'm aware.
Its not reconned. There is a full canon Marvel One Shot of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oOE3mJcGtU