DaCocoBrova said:
:lol OK. Dunno what makes you think that, but whatever.
...
Size is relative. Short of the whole communal shower thing, and the comments that females make (consistantly)
I rest my case.
Seriously though, if I was mistaken, then I'm mistaken-- I didn't say it to offend you. Just that between your splooging over the size of your dick and the "d00d, I make girls orgasm AT LEAST a dozen times in the first half hour" posts from a while back, it seemed that you were very "concerned" with your sexual prowess (i.e., that you were a boaster in that regard). Doesn't bother me, but I
do tend to look at such braggadocio as juvenile; keep this in perspective, however-- I also tend to think that people who brag about
anything are very insecure, regardless of their actual talents. So take it in context.
A guy who goes on and on about how good-looking he is to anyone who'll listen may in fact be very handsome, but he's certainly not secure in that fact. I've known a few guys like this, and two of them were models. Likewise, a guy who at every opportunity makes it a point to allude to his sexual prowess may be very good in the sack, but he's similarly not secure with that fact, else he wouldn't seek validation.
Now, you may not fall into that category-- all I'm saying is that from a few of the posts I've seen you make, it could be construed that way.

Don't take it personal-- it was just a social commentary.
EDIT: As for my personal theory as to why guys with abnormally large dicks are seemingly more concerned with it (and with the entire sexual realm; i.e., they tend to be more sexually aggressive) than others are, I feel it's perhaps because an excess of testosterone during development helped increase the size of their penis; on top of that, testosterone has known psychological effects, increased aggression (sexual and otherwise) being counted among them. So if we were doing a study of "dick size versus sexual aggressiveness", testosterone levels might be what is known as a "confounding variable" (that is, a third variable that is responsible for the two experimental variables-- dependent and independent-- but which was not itself under direct study).
Keep in mind that this is all anecdotal, so I may be entirely off (regarding the "guys with big wangs are more aggressive" stuff), but it's held in nearly every case I've seen.