Javthusiast
Banned
Me not caring cause Quantic Dream games suck. Tell Tale games with budget, shitty scripts all the time and gameplay that hasn't improved since Fahrenheit.
Last edited:
Agree with you manGood for them avoiding crazy.
Never stick your vibrating prosthetics in crazy.
LMAO that’s why they stopped working with Ubisoft right?Lol bullshit. Simply Sony won't publish anymore games by a studio with different accuses of harrassment leaked some time ago. The timing is not a coincidence.
LMAO that’s why they stopped working with Ubisoft right?
Sony didn't have to make a public statement about Ubisoft like they did QD, since they published all of the QD games made for their platform.LMAO that’s why they stopped working with Ubisoft right?
From when Sony publish Ubisoft games or working with them? The hell you are talking about?I was actually thinking that Detroit was pretty mild compared to Heavy Rain and B:TS in terms of pervy stuff. This is the kind of stuff that can never be verified but I find it plausible.
LMAO that’s why they stopped working with Ubisoft right?
i don't buy this "3 game exclusivity deal" sounds like bullshit. Why would any company make a deal like that so in advance before even the game's conception? It makes more sense they would deal with the games individually. Crazy to imagine someone take the risk of signing a contract for 3 games (that's like 10 years of work and expenses), where either part can't back out of it if things aren't working after the 1st or 2nd game, without any major repercussions/penalties at the very least.
lmao - more like, "Who?"Weirdest part of the article.
What?
They aren't published by Sony.But GTA and Witcher is fine where you can fuck whores.
Sony doesn't censor games. It's Japanese (or a few other countries like Germany, Australiar or China) national age rating system / game approval for retail games. If publishers want to put them on their big Japanese retails they have to censor them. This is why this censorship is also applied for the non-PlayStation platforms when they are also published in Japan for retail, and why they aren't censored outside Japan for PlayStation and the other platforms. In a few cases in the past they also did a censored version for USA to get a better retailer approval.Both were before the big censorship push though.
Their games for Sony featured nudity and sex scenes, and Detroit features android sex workers and a prostitution night club. I don't see the difference of making one of them a playable character. I think it's bullshit.I honestly would have loved to see David cage's 'nuanced' take on playing as an android prostitute. Guarantee almost every scene would have been more embarrassing than anything else in detroit.
Not true. As of mid 2018 Beyond had sold almost 3 millon copies and until then Heavy Rain had sold 5.3M copies in PS3+PS4.Main reason Sony dropped them is that after the success of the first game (Heavy Rain) both Beyond and Detroit underperformed both critically and commercially.
Sony doesn't censor games. It's Japanese (or a few other countries like Germany, Australiar or China) national age rating system / game approval for retail games. If publishers want to put them on their big Japanese retails they have to censor them. This is why this censorship is also applied for the non-PlayStation platforms when they are also published in Japan for retail, and why they aren't censored outside Japan for PlayStation and the other platforms. In a few cases in the past they also did a censored version for USA to get a better retailer approval.
Sony officials tell the Wall Street Journal that the gaming giant updated its policy for approving new PlayStation games worldwide, in response to the cultural shifts brought about by the #MeToo movement and the increased visibility of video game livestreaming.
Per the report, Sony wants to avoid promoting games that disparage and objectify women, or that contain sexual content. The company is particularly concerned about being associated with Japanese titles that feature sexualized images of underage girls.
Have you not played God of War?I know, I know. But if it was an interactive scene it might have been an instant no from Sony.
Kinda like the GTA 5 torture controversy, where you just press some buttons and the media went crazy.
That's just like with the movie industry imo. I still watch 80s 90s 2000s movies but feel nothing towards modern movies because they really doesn't do movies like that anymore.Both were before the big censorship push though.
For games they don't own and don't finance? Not that plausible to meSony had been making those kinds of exclusivity deals with Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Sucker Punch, etc before buying them out. Hence why there were a lot of trilogies.
This is totally plausible.
Censoring underage girls being the key takeaway of their message.We didn't get the PS4 DOAX in the US. That had nothing to do with Japan's rating system.
Sony is reportedly changing its standards for sexual content in new PlayStation games in response to the #MeToo movement and livestreaming
Sony has adopted new standards to cut down on sexually explicit depictions of women in video games sold for PlayStation.www.businessinsider.com
That's directly from Sony.
I think Sony's problem is that one of the main characters (who is supposedly a person to root for) was a sex worker. They probably thought it would be demeaning for women.
Censoring underage girls being the key takeaway of their message.
Sony wants to avoid promoting games that disparage and objectify women, or that contain sexual content.
If she were underage.This would also explain why they wouldn't want a "whore android" in a game they're publishing:
That doesn't seem credible. Why would Sony have anything to do with what goes in a game they didn't fund or even partially own from a third party developer. Sure they had their (timed) exclusivity agreement, but it's not like Sony decides what's goes in and what goes out. It's not like QD has to pitch their concepts to Sony for their total approval.i don't buy this "3 game exclusivity deal" sounds like bullshit. Why would any company make a deal like that so in advance before even the game's conception? It makes more sense they would deal with the games individually. Crazy to imagine someone take the risk of signing a contract for 3 games (that's like 10 years of work and expenses), where either part can't back out of it if things aren't working after the 1st or 2nd game, without any major repercussions/penalties at the very least.
I could see that too, yes.Wonder if she was supposed to be that character...
But GTA and Witcher is fine where you can fuck whores.
We didn't get the PS4 DOAX in the US.
That had nothing to do with Japan's rating system.
Sony is reportedly changing its standards for sexual content in new PlayStation games in response to the #MeToo movement and livestreaming
Sony has adopted new standards to cut down on sexually explicit depictions of women in video games sold for PlayStation.www.businessinsider.com
That's directly from Sony.
Sony didn't censor DOAX3, Koei Tecmo decided to release DOAX3 only in Asia, both for Sony and Switch platforms. Not only for PS, and obviously Sony doesn't decide what games are published on Switch. In this case, most likely Tecmo didn't release it in the west due to the rise of the SJW in western countries like USA, even getting important attacks from the gaming media related to these topics.Censoring underage girls being the key takeaway of their message.
Maybe the difference is that BR2049 isn't a PlayStation exclusive game, so doesn't get impacted by fanboy wars shit. Or because it wasn't a David Cage game, since for some reason some people seems to hate him when is ok with other games doing the same.I'm not seeing what's so controversial about this. Nobody had a problem with Ana de Armis' character in BR2049. What's the difference, really?
You know this "news" is not from an official source. I'd be more skeptical about it than proclaiming that as fact of what "exactly happened".You're wrong, the QD games were published by Sony as first party productions, Sony obviously has creative control on anything they publish like that.
And of course they can back out mid deal lol, that's exactly what happened.
I don't mind T & A in my games but it sounds like we got a better game without this character
Anal doesn't count.But abby.
I doubt the big boobs were the problem.
Knowing David Cage, it would have included a scene where you press buttons to undress yourself then a QTE where your characther is f*cked, maybe even some killing while in the act.
I don’t suppose you can read two more post after do you, you blind fuck. Before Detroit GOW3 and after Detroit TLOU2.These are not Sony games though.
What's with all the false equivalences in this thread? Are people really that clueless when it comes to what a publisher actually does?
Good points. Seems like much ado about nothing in terms of the content of what David Cage wanted to do. I'd read somewhere that Sony tried to reel Kojima in from doing some outlandish stuff he wanted to do in Death Stranding and I think this is a bad look for them. They should let creative talent do what they want to do and create the games they want to make. There's no way they'd put up so much resistance to Naughty Dog. I trust Kojima and David Cage a hell of a lot more than Herman Hulst, who is now the one calling the shots for Sony, when it comes to creating innovative games.Maybe the difference is that BR2049 isn't a PlayStation exclusive game, so doesn't get impacted by fanboy wars shit. Or because it wasn't a David Cage game, since for some reason some people seems to hate him when is ok with other games doing the same.
Good points. Seems like much ado about nothing in terms of the content of what David Cage wanted to do. I'd read somewhere that Sony tried to reel Kojima in from doing some outlandish stuff he wanted to do in Death Stranding and I think this is a bad look for them. They should let creative talent do what they want to do and create the games they want to make. There's no way they'd put up so much resistance to Naughty Dog.
I agree with you there yeah. The climate is much different now to even 5 years ago. It's a sad state of affairs when game creators can't take risks for fear of being cancelled.You can kind of see where Sony is coming from in 2021 though. All it takes is one danger hair to be streaming a game, they see something "problematic", it blows up all over social media, and then the mob gets triggered and Kotaku spams articles blasting Sony for not being an ally.