I'm so skeptical of this. Constraints breed creativity in many aspects and constructive criticism is healthy. Otherwise you end up with a George Lucas prequels scenario. I doubt every statement here.I'd read somewhere that Sony tried to reel Kojima in from doing some outlandish stuff he wanted to do in Death Stranding and I think this is a bad look for them. They should let creative talent do what they want to do and create the games they want to make. There's no way they'd put up so much resistance to Naughty Dog. I trust Kojima and David Cage a hell of a lot more than Herman Hulst, who is now the one calling the shots for Sony, when it comes to creating innovative games.
I think its more that abbys scene is tasteful where as cages are creepy tbhAbby has no tits so thats ok.
I loved it even more than a lot of games that year Detroit was greatDoubt on both accounts. Game was as boring and predictable as a network drama, definitely could have used some crazy and objectionable content.
I don’t suppose you can read two more post after do you, you blind fuck. Before Detroit GOW3 and after Detroit TLOU2.
Dude it's their platform. Mentioned earlier, they got Capcom to remove the more nsfw scene in DMCV and that only happened on Playstation. The other platforms kept the original scene.Is it time for your meds or something internet hard man?
We don't know enough about what QD wanted to show but the Abby scene at least was between consenting adults in an existing relationship, don't see why Sony would have a problem with that in an 18 rated game.
GOW3 is a fair point but it's a fairly old game now and maybe Sony wouldn't publish that scene today (apart from in a remaster).
GTA and the Witcher still have fuck all to do with the topic.
Are you a Playstation PR or something? The remaster released in 2015 dude. It is fucked up that disgusting extreme violence is okay because their influence on the rating boards but boobs are a big no.Is it time for your meds or something internet hard man?
We don't know enough about what QD wanted to show but the Abby scene at least was between consenting adults in an existing relationship, don't see why Sony would have a problem with that in an 18 rated game.
GOW3 is a fair point but it's a fairly old game now and maybe Sony wouldn't publish that scene today (apart from in a remaster).
GTA and the Witcher still have fuck all to do with the topic.
If you're taking about the lens flare butt, they removed the flare so it's the same on all platforms again (in NA at least).Dude it's their platform. Mentioned earlier, they got Capcom to remove the more nsfw scene in DMCV and that only happened on Playstation. The other platforms kept the original scene.
edit: if I came off a bit agressive, sorry. kinda having a bad time earlier.
yup. that's it. the fact that they can easily remove and put it back in shows they have some form of control over what gets shown to the public. It should extend to older and newer games as well.If you're taking about the lens flare butt, they removed the flare so it's the same on all platforms again (in NA at least).
But she has small tits and whores fuck her instead.But abby.
QD probably wanted to go about it in a very weird and creepy way though. Gta isn't weird and creepy and neither was other games like TLOU. Well weird yes lolThat makes no sense lol
Sony first party games didn’t have that kind of censorship… big boobs can be showed in M titles.
In October 2016, the screenplay was completed after more than two years.[72] Writer Adam Williams was hired to help finish and flesh out the story.[3] Cage used charts and diagrams to see where the choices would end up;[73] penning "five or six thousand pages of notes", he likened the story to a Rubik's Cube.[74] Two scenes were cancelled for how violence was portrayed.[75]
All sex androids in Detroit has normal boob sizes
You used "they" twice but referred to different groups? First they Capcom, second they Sony? Also Sony doesn't "control what gets shown to the public" except on their platform, which they rightfully have the responsibility to do.yup. that's it. the fact that they can easily remove and put it back in shows they have some form of control over what gets shown to the public. It should extend to older and newer games as well.
I'm only referring to Sony and yes, having control over their platform was my point and it not just being limited to Sony published games.You used "they" twice but referred to different groups? First they Capcom, second they Sony? Also Sony doesn't "control what gets shown to the public" except on their platform, which they rightfully have the responsibility to do.
I agree, but management changed during the almost 6 years from preproduction to release...so maybe, things changed too.Yep. When the project was greenlit they would have had to make a pitch. And if that pitch contained a protagonist they weren't comfortable with, they'd have kicked it back then and there. Its just business, so I highly doubt there'd be any negative feeling on the part of either side.
After Detroit I would rather have another David Cage game than Uncharted to be honest.If true:
On the one hand this attitude from Sony sucks
On the other hand Sony no longer spending money on crappy David Cage movies is good.
After Detroit I would rather have another David Cage game than Uncharted to be honest.
Abby has no tits so thats ok.
DMCV SE did, but they patched it out after people complained.
Leaving the rest of that sentence in a spoiler made it worseBut I came to the conclusion that she's fuckable.
Seems a bunch of bullshit.
Main reason Sony dropped them is that after the success of the first game (Heavy Rain) both Beyond and Detroit underperformed both critically and commercially.
At the same time the studio was getting hit with harassment accusations, toxic work environment accusations and lawsuits.
Put all that together and you realize that Sony has distanced themselves from other studios for much less.
It’s not a timed agreement.That doesn't seem credible. Why would Sony have anything to do with what goes in a game they didn't fund or even partially own from a third party developer. Sure they had their (timed) exclusivity agreement, but it's not like Sony decides what's goes in and what goes out. It's not like QD has to pitch their concepts to Sony for their total approval.i don't buy this "3 game exclusivity deal" sounds like bullshit. Why would any company make a deal like that so in advance before even the game's conception? It makes more sense they would deal with the games individually. Crazy to imagine someone take the risk of signing a contract for 3 games (that's like 10 years of work and expenses), where either part can't back out of it if things aren't working after the 1st or 2nd game, without any major repercussions/penalties at the very least.
After Detroit I would rather have another David Cage game than Uncharted to be honest.
Not exagerated big and not flat chested, maybe "average boob size" would be better worded?. They all have the same body type just diferent faces. So im calling bullshit to the idea that they had a big boobed android for playable character that was shut down by Sony, when all sex androids in the game have the same body shape.Wtf is '' normal boob size ''?
Studios have said over and over Sony lets them do what they want.Good points. Seems like much ado about nothing in terms of the content of what David Cage wanted to do. I'd read somewhere that Sony tried to reel Kojima in from doing some outlandish stuff he wanted to do in Death Stranding and I think this is a bad look for them. They should let creative talent do what they want to do and create the games they want to make. There's no way they'd put up so much resistance to Naughty Dog. I trust Kojima and David Cage a hell of a lot more than Herman Hulst, who is now the one calling the shots for Sony, when it comes to creating innovative games.
Sony absolutely does censor M rated gamesDetroit: Become Human was rated M and so that censorship doesn't exists.
If it was a T or even lower rate then I could understand.
But Sony doesn't censorship M titles.
...I'd read somewhere that Sony tried to reel Kojima in from doing some outlandish stuff he wanted to do in Death Stranding and I think this is a bad look for them. They should let creative talent do what they want to do and create the games they want to make. ...