japtor said:God knows Moto would probably show thousands of little Matrix bug like things invading your tablet with new news stories while you're sleeping to demonstrate it.
Wow, but you have Time Warner internet? I thought they just need a Time Warner IP address.NomarTyme said:I tried using the TWC app but it didn't work because I didn't have "authorized cable modem" freaking bs.
Marty Chinn said:The question is, why do you constantly want to hop between apps when you don't always need to? Do you use a RSS reader?
I withdraw my statementCharred Greyface said:Cheap shot. I've seen this problem on iOS too. Friends asking me why their iPhone is dying so quickly and they've got a couple email accounts on their phone set to push, left bluetooth and the gps on, push notifications for all those services, wifi constantly searching in the background and then the screen brightness on the highest. *shrug* I point them to Apple's battery saving tips and call it a day. At least on android, there is a feature to tell you what's using up the battery life.
badcrumble said:I strongly suspect that iOS 5 is going to be a very, very nice leap forward for the iPad.
Yeah I do, but for some reason the app gave me the "authorize cable modem BS"numble said:Wow, but you have Time Warner internet? I thought they just need a Time Warner IP address.
All I actually want on the iPad, and iPhone, is weather and clock icons with updating icons.hyp said:i really hope so. way too much speculation at this point. let's cross our fingers that apple is listening.
Yeah, iv'e always wanted an icon update api. I'm sure developers could do some cool stuff. Make it part of the notification or multitasking api to not chew through too much battery.Jasoco said:All I actually want on the iPad, and iPhone, is weather and clock icons with updating icons.
It's not even a battery thing since both apps and the home screen springboard are controlled by Apple anyway. Plus, the statusbar updates every frame, so why not use a few more cycles to change the clock hands? As for weather, well, that can be retrieved every few hours. That would take no battery at all relatively.
I don't even want widgets, but I would like to have icons that change. The calendar does it. But not the clock or weather. And both of those are missing on the iPad. So I hope iOS 5 brings at least the clock. (I use Weather+ on the iPad now. But would love if Apple released an "icon update API" so developers could change their icons. And I don't mean just badges.
I hope iOS 5 is really really advanced from what we have. But it probably won't be.
numble said:Last year they had their iOS event on April 8, 5 days after the iPad launch (iPad launched a month later than this year). So hopefully there should be an iOS event within the next 3 weeks.
Jasoco said:All I actually want on the iPad, and iPhone, is weather and clock icons with updating icons.
I think by this stage, it's safe to assume that any functionality that we can dream up and want for the stock OS, someone else has thought of and implemented for jail broken devices.LyleLanley said:Look up LiveClock and WeatherIcon if you have a jailbroken phone.
mrkgoo said:I think by this stage, it's safe to assume that any functionality that we can dream up and want for the stock OS, someone else has thought of and implemented for jail broken devices.
But wanting something to be part of the regular OS is still something different.
If we're going to play the "redefine each other" game then what I find exciting is something that inspires the imagination and curiosity instead of making the world look like a closed, dark box (unless you spend a lot of money in iTunes).LCfiner said:basically, the difference in opinion is about what you, personally, find more exciting: a fun music creation tool or a homescreen calendar widget.
Of All Trades said:If we're going to play the "redefine each other" game then what I find exciting is something that inspires the imagination and curiosity instead of making the world look like a closed, dark box (unless you spend a lot of money in iTunes).
Frankly the fact that you see the only two options for a homescreen being Apple's and widgits says more about your lack of imagination than anything else. The fact that you even began to engage in this sort of arguing tactic means you aren't willing to learn.
Well I think Android sucks so much. However I don't think it sucks because Android allows many background processes, I think it sucks because it gives users little indication or control of what runs in the background. Those background processes are what most users say is the reason for poor battery life. *shrug* Android's multitasking UI is very poor imo. Apple has its own problems. Apple's top 5 suggestions are:Jasoco said:I withdraw my statement
The point for me still stands though. In my experience, both personal and by the experiences of friends who use both Android and iOS, iOS is just more reliable and better thought out. And, please don't take wrong and quote me out of context saying "Android sucks so much!" because that's not what I'm saying.
Minimize use of location services
Turn off push notifications
Fetch new data less frequently
Turn off push mail
Auto-check fewer email accounts
(etc)
Yes.numble said:People with the personal hotspot feature, can you create a hotspot even if you don't have a connection?
If you have an offline GPS app, will you get a GPS location on the iPad with this dead network link?
Whoa that's terrible! I thought it was showing on the back of the iPad from one shot I saw. Surely Apple are replacing people's who have that issue, right?numble said:![]()
![]()
A defect on some screens. Most noticeable when you're looking at black. The backlight is leaking out of the edges.
Yep. And since some people don't know, I'll repeat it again... Apple will replace iPads bought at Best Buy/Target/where ever with new ones. At least one person in this thread returned his iPad to Best Buy and had to endure the problems of lines, etc. with buying another iPad.Meier said:Whoa that's terrible! I thought it was showing on the back of the iPad from one shot I saw. Surely Apple are replacing people's who have that issue, right?
Maybe they need a special toggle that changes the devices 'state', like a user configurable state including a bunch of OS settings (possibly defined by the user or maybe defined by apple) that puts a device in a super battery mode. Maybe the silent switch can have more toggles within it that allow you to also switch of notifications and push when you are in 'silent' mode.Charred Greyface said:Well I think Android sucks so much. However I don't think it sucks because Android allows many background processes, I think it sucks because it gives users little indication or control of what runs in the background. Those background processes are what most users say is the reason for poor battery life. *shrug* Android's multitasking UI is very poor imo. Apple has its own problems. Apple's top 5 suggestions are:
Yet all of those options are buried in submenus in the Settings app and are a pain to toggle on and off in a bid to improve battery life while still using those services.
Neither Apple nor Google give the users great tools for combating the biggest sources of poor battery life on their platform, that's all I'm saying.
Yes.
Charred Greyface said:Yet all of those options are buried in submenus in the Settings app and are a pain to toggle on and off in a bid to improve battery life while still using those services.
Neither Apple nor Google give the users great tools for combating the biggest sources of
poor battery life on their platform, that's all I'm saying.
numble said:![]()
People with the personal hotspot feature, can you create a hotspot even if you don't have a connection?
If you have an offline GPS app, will you get a GPS location on the iPad with this dead network link?
I find the iPad's approach to the internet, with having to pay for tabbed browsing/other interface issues, being redirected to mobile websites, and with random chunks of it sealed away (due either to flash or other content restrictions) to be anti-curiosity.LCfiner said:so you don't find any of the iPad applications or any of the information on the entire internet to be inspiring or interesting? that's really what you're saying?
I've seen "this content is not supported on your device" far too often to be excusable on a device that can cost as much as $900 after tax. Hell, my iPhone U-Verse app has more functionality than my iPad one.and you're talking about the iPad as a closed, dark box? and you expect me to take you seriously?
I look down on the idea that making things easier to understand can only be done by stripping out options and functionality. And I fully dispute the idea that something like DropBox or FTP or using iTunes' app interface is easier to understand and less intimidating to people than having the iPad directly interface with an external HDD or USB drive (which are sold at Costco next to memory cards, right in the main walkway).By making everything easier to understand and less intimidating to people, the iPad is attempting to get more people excited about technology and the internet. and you somehow look down on this?
So you think the iPad and smartphones are more exciting than the rise and spread of the internet.the most exciting thing to happen to technology in the past twenty years is happening right now with smartphones and tablets (which, really, is just the ipad right now till competitors start selling in mass quantities)
I feel you're the one lacking imagination to be unable to appreciate this.
hyp said:here we go again about adding functionality to iOS...
take your functionality and shove it. i want shit like this on my iPad (oh WAIT, it's here already):
http://vimeo.com/19272580
pure, unadulterated, focused, full-screen applications. i don't need another calendar or clock widget to remind me i am a minute or day closer to death.
edit:i could use better notifications though!
Background downloads and a single shared file storage area would be just peachy, IMO (and would result in all sorts of cool new apps that could take advantage of these things and/or huge improvements to existing apps).JonCha said:Agreed. To me Android is ugly, and widgets don't actually provide that much functionality. It's simply an easy - and lazy - argument that can be made vs iOS. When I had a Nexus S for a couple of months, they got in the way.
I'm not sure what I wanted Apple to implement in iOS 5, apart from a better notification system. I literally have no idea.
Of All Trades said:I've seen "this content is not supported on your device" far too often to be excusable on a device that can cost as much as $900 after tax. Hell, my iPhone U-Verse app has more functionality than my iPad one.
Of All Trades said:I look down on the idea that making things easier to understand can only be done by stripping out options and functionality. And I fully dispute the idea that something like DropBox or FTP or using iTunes' app interface is easier to understand and less intimidating to people than having the iPad directly interface with an external HDD or USB drive (which are sold at Costco next to memory cards, right in the main walkway).
LCfiner said:other companies don't need to match Apple on pricing. Omnifocus is 40 bucks (you other guys want to talk about functionality and getting shit done? OF is the real deal. you don't need a PC app to complement it at all)
djay is 20 bucks. beatmaker is 20. most of the indepth art, music and todo apps are >5 bucks. a lot of them are over 10. the iPad, more than the iPhone, supports these higher pricepoints. companies don't need to drop down to Apple's lower prices.
Tobor said:I'll take my full screen RSS app over a widget, since I know that's where you're going with this.
I'm not anti-functionality, far from it. I just don't want functionality for the sake of matching a bullet point list, and I don't think certain functionality(i.e. widgets) is any where as important as you do.
That said, if Apple can design a compelling way to change the homescreen that doesn't obfuscate the experience for the average user, then that's great.
japtor said:They weren't going to show iOS 5 to be released after an x month beta cycle in the same event as new hardware being released in the next week. "Here's this awesome new hardware, and this awesome new software! (but the software won't be out for a while so just ignore that for now)."
JonCha said:Agreed. To me Android is ugly, and widgets don't actually provide that much functionality. It's simply an easy - and lazy - argument that can be made vs iOS. When I had a Nexus S for a couple of months, they got in the way.
I'm not sure what I wanted Apple to implement in iOS 5, apart from a better notification system. I literally have no idea.
badcrumble said:Only problem with the tethering thing is that it requires you to have it on month-to-month, whereas the iPad data plans let you buy one month at a time, IIRC.for the love of god, jailbreak your goddamn phone
Why should I? I thought the iPad was revolutionary and magical. It should just work.Burger said:Talk to the content suppliers. Ask Google why nothing works on Google TV.
Again with this false dichotomy.I think people are resonating with a device that treats them like people, not Comp Sci majors. Why are people buying iPads? Because they are fucking complex and hard to learn?
Are any of the reasons good for an iPad owner?Keep dreaming about USB functionality, there is a myriad of reasons why that's not happening.
Burger said:Talk to the content suppliers. Ask Google why nothing works on Google TV.
Of All Trades said:Why should I? I thought the iPad was revolutionary and magical. It should just work.
Honestly there are just so many apps in those categories it's hard to do a comprehensive write up. Do you want a top ten list or a "breakdown"?Technosteve said:Can one of you ipad veteran make a top ten ipad apps. I liked the breakdown for comic reader apps, would like one for apps for sketching, rss feeds and news apps which one doesn't suck.
I'll hang up now and listen to your response.
Of All Trades said:Why should I? I thought the iPad was revolutionary and magical. It should just work.
Again with this false dichotomy.
Are any of the reasons good for an iPad owner?
I completely agree with LCfiner. I am certainly not an apple fanboy. I don't particularly care for a lot of things they do and for ways they handle lots of things, but iOS is simply about the apps.jon bones said:yeesh, this makes me cringe to read
yea, I noticed it on my own as well as evidenced by my first post after getting the ipad. I hadn't read anything about it since I was playing softball friday night came back and synched my ipad and started using it and noticed it when i was watching a video. Then noticed it again when apps that go to a black screen when loading. Just the other night i had turned the brightness all the way down and there was bleeding all around my screen. So i'll be taking it back shortly.shantyman said:It's not minor. My wife noticed it on her own as a problem as soon as she turned it on with no knowledge at all that is was common.
Of All Trades said:Why should I? I thought the iPad was revolutionary and magical. It should just work.
Of All Trades said:Again with this false dichotomy.
Of All Trades said:Are any of the reasons good for an iPad owner?
This coming from someone who bumped the Xoom thread to post a two-word troll? Really?krypt0nian said:AH so you are trolling. K.
I think Apple's strategy of concentrating it's money on things that are experienced by everyone (IPS display, unibody aluminum structure, thinness, weight and battery life), while keeping a lower price point is better than putting it all there and having a higher entry price point (while still having clunky displays or heavier, thicker plastic bodies). If you never use the adapters, you save money, but you can't buy a dongle to add an IPS display to your device, or make your device thinner or lighter.Marty Chinn said:Everyone talks about Apple's low price point, but man what's the cost after you add up all the extras?
Marty Chinn said:Actually, you completely misguessed where I was going with that. How do you use an RSS feeder? To pull different sources of info together to one central location. Why don't you just bookmark a bunch of places and just visit each individual website in a browser? Why do you need an RSS reader if you can do that all with a browser? Now extrapolate why you would want to open each app instead of having widgets centralize all that informaton so you don't need to go hitting each thing one at a time.
That's one example of an advantage of widgets, and I can't understand how someone who uses an RSS reader to avoid going to a bunch of sites but yet not understand why it would be great to use widgets for apps for the same purpose. It's the same principle.
Copernicus said:Are you really lumping file type support with licensing schemes?
Awesome.
He was complaining about why some content would display on the iPhone, but on the iPad, the content provider will block it by saying iPads are not supported.Copernicus said:Are you really lumping file type support with licensing schemes?
Awesome.
Of All Trades said:This coming from someone who bumped the Xoom thread to post a two-word troll? Really?
The point is that if I want to watch tonight's Survivor on my iPad I have to pay money for it, unless there's some other method I haven't figured out yet. I guess that counts as revolutionary since it is completely at odds with how television is currently handled on the internet but I don't think anyone really wants that kind of revolution (except maybe AT&T).