Are you talking about Jubeat Plus? I think it's only available in Japan so far:Stat Flow said:
http://youtu.be/G9BOOXUrgb0
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Apple iPad 2 |OT|
- Thread starter giga
- Start date
- Status
http://youtu.be/G9BOOXUrgb0
Dreams-Visions
Member
iPad 3 Retina Display will be shown next week.
conjecture, but I don't think an educated guess could be any more logical or rational.
2,560 x 1,600 @ 10.1" am GO.
conjecture, but I don't think an educated guess could be any more logical or rational.
2,560 x 1,600 @ 10.1" am GO.
Buckethead
Banned
Bu bu but that won't happen cuz the retina display isn't possible!!1Dreams-Visions said:
That sounds more likely for an Android device, probably a Samsung Galaxy Tab. If Samsung can really get one out this fall, with the upcoming Nvidia chips, that would be a megaton.Dreams-Visions said:
That said, I'm more interested in LG's 4.5" and 7" panels.
I'm seriously rethinking my purchase of the iPad2. CRM was a major reason for me to buy the iPad.Teddman said:
Dreams-Visions
Member
I definitely doubt Samsung would make this tech to keep it exclusive to their products.Charred Greyface said:
No, they AND LG will be selling them to everyone who wants to buy. And Apple will want to buy.
LyleLanley
Banned
Dreams-Visions said:
I still want to know how something the size of an iPad is going to power that display especially given how good some of the games currently out there look.
Apple isn't going to use a 10.1" non-IPS display. Samsung won't keep it exclusive but it'll be reserved first for their products and be available in limited quantities for everyone else. How many other Android phones have SAMOLED displays?Dreams-Visions said:I definitely doubt Samsung would make this tech to keep it exclusive to their products.
No, they AND LG will be selling them to everyone who wants to buy. And Apple will want to buy.
LG won't be selling it to everyone, especially if Apple stumped up the cash for developing and manufacturing the screens. The 3.5" retina displays so far are either licensed exclusive to Apple or the entire bulk of the production runhas been paid for in advance by Apple. Only two other phones (android) use those 3.5 retina displays, one of which is sold only in Japan and the other of which is sold only in China.
Lagspike_exe
Member
1,024 x 768 = 786,432
2,560 x 1,600 = 4,096,000 pixels.
4,096,000 / 768,432 = 5,33
Where is Apple going to find enough rendering power to push more than 5x the amount of pixels iPad 2 has? iPad 2 had a huge amount of power increase compared to iPad 2, I'm not sure if they can pull this again. Especially if they want to launch later this year.
2,560 x 1,600 = 4,096,000 pixels.
4,096,000 / 768,432 = 5,33
Where is Apple going to find enough rendering power to push more than 5x the amount of pixels iPad 2 has? iPad 2 had a huge amount of power increase compared to iPad 2, I'm not sure if they can pull this again. Especially if they want to launch later this year.
LyleLanley
Banned
giga said:
I think the difference is that it's not unreasonable to believe the iPhone 4/iPad 2 can handle the iPhones 960x640 resolution but to do 2048x1536 is pretty hard to imagine right now.
Tobor said:
no, but the point I took from the announcement is that those pixel densities on 10" screens is now out of the labs. (anyone who thought they would change aspect ratios isn't paying attention, I agree)
Apple would almost assuredly go for a different aspect ratio (and without the pentile pixel arrangement) but the announcement of this panel now means the odds of a "retina" iPad 3 much better, imo.
krypt0nian
Banned
jon bones said:
Exactly.
drkOne
Member
I have a question for Comic Flow users, how can I create a folder on Windows 7 that gets synced automatically over my network?
I'm currently using Cyberduck but I remember reading here on GAF I could simply create a folder on my desktop for drag and dropping, which would be perfect.
I'm currently using Cyberduck but I remember reading here on GAF I could simply create a folder on my desktop for drag and dropping, which would be perfect.
NYR
Member
Quite the mis-leading link title. Samsung does not provide touchscreen LCDs to Apple, LG does. In fact, this is more likely to be seen on a Galaxy tab then an iPad.Dreams-Visions said:
This is the equivalent of saying Kinect for Playstation is coming next year because it exists for Microsoft.
I know where you're coming from, just think it's the wrong way of going at it. No one ever doubted the technology for a retina display existed or was possible. They were already out - really expensive and not mass produced. But the very fact Samsung are JUST showing it off now goes to show you that it wasn't possible 2 months ago for a wide release.
It's great for movie watching though. It's also kinda crazy that the Asus tablet has a better screen and better battery life than all the entry-level Mac notebooks (including the 13" MBP) all of which are twice the price. The Android tablets could be real notebook/netbook replacements while the iPad isn't quite there yet.Tobor said:
brotkasten
Member
16:9 is great for TV shows and movies, but it sucks for everything else. Doesn't matter if it's a tablet or a PC.
Dreams-Visions
Member
I think you took that link title much too hard and too literally. lol. A read of the article will show the obvious conjecture.NYR said:
Anyway, LG provides Apple's displays *right now*. Samsung can most certainly be contracted to supply the next iPad's display. What we will see next week can most certainly be considered the kind of thing we'll see in te next iPad, which you did understand was the point. Whether or not Samsung is the supplier or not is a function of what the competition can do and when they can do it. Samsung has said their 300dpi tech will be ready to ship in the Fall. Sounds like it'll be a viable option for the iPad.
Samsung will be looking to sell panels to any buyer with money. Including Apple, provided they can make a 300dpi 4:3 screen. And it looks to me like they are ahead of the curve.
Charred Greyface said:
that's not what I meant. I meant that adding the complexity necessary to make the iPad into a complete notebook replacement would diminish the overall appeal of the product.
that doesn't mean that there are no ways for the ipad to be more useful or to rely less on a PC and still be easy to use (heck, it'd be easier to use if it didn't need to sync to itunes before using it). But I feel that the people who absolutely need traditional PCs for whatever reason will not be replacing them with ipads. the ipad will always be supplemental for them.
for people who only use a fraction of a PC's capbilities, well, I think the iPad can and is replacing those PCs right now.
brotkasten
Member
Competition? Then why are we talking about Android tablets?Copernicus said:
brotkasten
Member
4:3 is much closer to the format of magazines and websites than 16:9.Copernicus said:
He was pointing out that it was the same thing. iPhone 3GS to 4 had pretty much the same CPU and GPU (just clocked up), and they quadrupled the resolution. Going to 2048x1536 is the same jump in scale, and not that crazy when you consider that the iPad 2 has (conveniently) something like 4x the fill rate of the original, which is why it can already do 1080p no problem. Clock it up a bit and you should handle 2048 fine.LyleLanley said:
...That said I wouldn't be surprised to see a performance hit for some stuff like the iPhone 4 had, which is why I'm not a fan of the move. But generally it should be fine.
Of course they could just add more cores or change it up with the next gen cores which look to be a huge huge jump.
Yeah they're not going to hoard them for themselves when Apple is willing to shove a few billion dollars in their face.Dreams-Visions said:
krypt0nian
Banned
Tobor said:
This. 16x9 is foolish for a tablet design.
Dreams-Visions
Member
I'd like to see a 16:10 screen before so readily dismissing it like some of you are.
- Status