Just wanted to check in and let everybody know that I'm here, keeping up with the thread, just don't have much to add to the conversation (although the conversation keeps growing as I try to finalize this post. This took way too long to cobble together lol). Noting what people say, keeping my own notes. I'm hesitant to jump on any kind of last minute band-wagon. I'll change my vote only if it's down to two or three players I feel strongly about. I'll respond to a couple of things:
Arkos - okies, so he's active and that's nice, but oozes a lot of cluelessness and he's super cute when he's relieved that the spotlight is not on him. You ask, examples? Well! YNNNY has them!
1)
794 - This is ... probably the first time since Squidy's sauron eye weakened its grip on Arkos. And he latches on to fellow players' pick on on Seath very eagerly.
2)
813 - Now he's cutely raising his voice towards other people's concern on EzekelRAGE's changed playstyle.... even when he admitted that he didn't read the AC thread
3)
886 - Casually agreeing with Palmer that Septimus is suspicious.
1) Like I said, most of what I have to say is just keeping up with the conversation and noting what other people say that I agree with, which was all I was trying to do in these posts, give some encouragement to people / let them know that I follow their line of thinking. In the Seath situation,
I had already questioned that post earlier so I was glad to finally see somebody else question it. Still never got an answer about the strange rabbi that visited Seath. 2) I wanted to make it clear that I hadn't read the AC thread so that people wouldn't mistakenly take my post as first hand knowledge of the situation. 3) See 1
Arkos : Early volunteer and seems to have it out for squid, but his reasons why are weak at best. He even acknowledged the fact that a day 1 choice will have flimsy reasons, so why risk it to accidentally lycnh a potential useful town player? He is suspect to me
I already noted that my vote for squidyj is contingent on the fact that he's not in any danger.
Arkos made some mistakes right at the start of the game in regards to how missions worked but as the confusion didn't persist to long I could see that as genuine.I'm not a fan of this post
424 as he is not trusting of squidy because squidy is asking question. Seeing as that's the whole point of the game this is like not trusting a swimmer because he got in the water. As has been mentioned the big post against squidy didn't have much to it ( the top town/top scum method is apparently complicated?) As squidy is quite a relentless player maybe he is just crumbling user the pressure. Not sure if scum or misguided town. I change what way I swing slightly every time I reread his posts.
1) Looking back I wasn't clear, I guess it was more the tone of his questions that rubbed me wrong. Didn't seem like the most constructive tone. This seems like it may be squidyj's squid-style, but that
was my gut reaction to his posts. 2) The volunteer method wasn't complicated in and of itself, but considering the logistics of actually doing it, yeah it seems more complicated than is necessary/ideal. I tend to agree more with Palmer's feelings about volunteering (we can use reason and talking rather than some "system" to decide)(please god don't let Palmer be scum lol)
As for the crumbling under pressure, this post alludes to it too:
Arkos - Novice player who understandably overreacts at pressure, nothing to see here. Newer players to revenge vote/press because they don't know what it means to present town, what it means to present scum, but they know they're town, so anyone who accuses them must be out to get them, a.k.a. scum
I do want to point out that, while this is undoubtedly partly true, I was suspicious of squidyj
before he started addressing me, whether I'm right or wrong. I don't feel like I'm
just reacting. Of course, having honest suspicions and then having them turned around on me is leading me to be more suspicious, but I do feel like I have a perception of squidyj independent of that that makes me suspicious of him. For what that's worth. Note again that at no point have I been pushing for others to vote on squidy, I didn't even vote for him for a long time, I'm just trying to voice my honest perceptions and contribute something unique to the conversation. Nothing personal squidface
BUT ENOUGH ABOUT ALL OF THAT. Other people I've noted:
Seath: fluff posting (and
conspiring with squidyj about VD tests and chillis)
Septimus: playing dumb
Ezekel: apparently changed style of play? His explanation sounded somewhat reasonable though
Hobo:
quick to clarify when he changed his vote from GLT. Maybe because he doesn't want to be id'd as starting bandwagon?
Mazre: this one is well-covered by others, I also thought the random vote was kind of odd, although apparently he did it last game too (right?). Maybe trying to project the same playstyle from game to game?
The visualante post that squidyj quoted first just reads as unintelligible to me. There's some sentences in there lacking verbs or subjects. Not sure what to make of it, but I do fail to see how putting people on missions is a bad idea. If anything it gives mafia the opportunity to slip up by killing one of them so that we have an immediate 1/3 shot at one of the mafia. And he hasn't posted much. Not sure.