Terrabyte20xx
Junior Wrestlemania XXX Champion
UNVOTE
I agree that Dr. Worm played this situation very strangely.
They quoted your post voting for acohrs and asked you to expand upon why you did, but when you gave an answer, Dr. Worm just quoted the original acohrs vote post again instead of directly addressing your answer to him.
Well then, that went nowhere.
UNVOTE
Same goes for Fat4All.
Anywhere. Not sure where to put it on yet, considering my options first.Where were you expecting it to go? Also, no new vote?
I was a little hesitant to pile onto Lifeline, since I know he's new and a couple of other people were coming after him, and then went on him again when he backed down.
I'm... less reticent now that he's tried again, but I try to be fair with people. I'm naturally trusting and have a tendency to seek consensus, and I'm entirely cognizant of how that's landed me where I am now.
Makes sense to me
UNVOTE
It's a bit of a mess right now to be honest. Generally speaking I feel better about the players that aren't jumping on every little thing like it's some massive tell. Lot of awkward play going on right now but I can't necessarily attribute much of it as specifically scum behavior.
Sorian, can you lay down some info on why you voted Dr Worm?
Is is just a general vibe or how they're playing or sommit?
The main reason is how he got into the SexyFish vote with me yesterday. I waited because I wanted Fish under pressure but even at the time I commented how I didn't like the wagoning. That with the re entry today and the no real stance yet has me curious.
I'm sorry that not everyone takes a completely uniform stance? Just because someone else accuses you of one thing doesn't mean I can't accuse you of something different.I guess not because apparently I didn't make any attempt to put any pressure on lifeline, so CLEARlY that wasn't me throwing shade at him.
So that's two of my votes now that you've criticized for very weak reasoning. First I shouldn't vote Star because "that's just how she is" and now I shouldn't vote Terra because...it's opportunistic of me to notice his complete 180 and sudden willingness to lynch someone he's not even suspicious of by teaming up with the person he supposedly is? Not really following your logic.This vote is opportunistic as fuck.
In a world where Kalor and I are scum together do you really think we would coordinate to dog pile on someone by ourselves? Kalor's reasoning for his vote and mine are two completely different things. We would have to be one really dysfunctional scum team. Besides - you do realize that by piggybacking Sorian you're essentially doing the exact thing you just accused me of right?I am now very concerned about Natiko. I'm piggybacking on Sorian here but that the opportunism of that vote on Terra cannot be ignored. Same goes for Fat4All.
Kalor, who himself is under suspicion, makes a weak vote on Terra and those two are right in behind it seeing an opportunity to jump on a wagon with a compromised player.
VOTE: Natiko
Feels like too many people trying to be scumhunting extraordinaires, a little bit.
If anything this is more problematic than your initial thinking. Did you feel threatened by the one vote on you?
So that's two of my votes now that you've criticized for very weak reasoning. First I shouldn't vote Star because "that's just how she is" and now I shouldn't vote Terra because...it's opportunistic of me to notice his complete 180 and sudden willingness to lynch someone he's not even suspicious of by teaming up with the person he supposedly is? Not really following your logic.
The Star vote was whatever, I didn't criticize it in a "you're scummy" kind of way, I was saying it was a worthless vote and I know you knew it. This current one I do have issue. You didn't really seem to notice the 180, you seemed to be piggybacking a vote/logic that someone else placed. I'm not voting you because I'm not even sure if it was scumminess or laziness but I did want to point it out at least.
Your conviction is commendable.
Heh. We've got time, I'll humor you.
VOTE: Acohrs
So you went from voting for him to voting with him to humor him?
VOTE: Terrabyte20xx
Yeah, didn't know that was an actual mafia term. My point still stands.Okay, now this is just a rediculous misuse of mafia terms and reading intention.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Hammer
Hammering is when someone votes the last one required to Lynch, at best you might be able to use that term to say that I am trying to lead a Lynch, and even then I have made it abundantly clear that is not what I am trying to do.
That was me hoping to get a reaction from Lifeline; I have no doubt someone new at being scum would have consulted with their team on how to respond and maybe a good or rash response there would have clued me in on what to think of him. I wasn't expecting others to react defensively though maybe it was for the best?That's kinda the heart of why I was interested in defending Lifeline, and why I tried to take a more conciliatory approach, especially after he backed down under pressure when Fireblend said
which can create something of a "damned if you, damned if you don't" type of atmosphere for posting.
You seem to have made the same exact mistake Faddy made in accusing me of piggybacking Kalor. That's simply incorrect as why Kalor voted Terra and why I voted Terra are two different things. I'm not exactly sure how I could have piggybacked anyone when I was the first person to post after Terra made the post that was suspicious to me and drew my vote.
The Star vote was whatever, I didn't criticize it in a "you're scummy" kind of way, I was saying it was a worthless vote and I know you knew it. This current one I do have issue. You didn't really seem to notice the 180, you seemed to be piggybacking a vote/logic that someone else placed. I'm not voting you because I'm not even sure if it was scumminess or laziness but I did want to point it out at least.
So first I'm piggybacking someone else's logic and didn't notice the 180 - then instead my logic is unique and I was the one that noticed the 180, but it's weak and just me trying to look busy? You're being about as consistent as Terra was when he flip flopped and earned a vote. Reads to me like a case of you throwing shade only to realize your original reasoning didn't fit. Now you're just changing your perception in order to maintain your original stance.Except that Faddy straight said he was copying what I said so if I made mistake then he would have too. That said, while the reasoning was different, the vote felt like it came from a weak justification but allowed you to get in on a vote. That's why I called it opportunistic. It came across as you trying to look busy.
By the way I am strongly believe Lifeline is not scum.
Hi welcome to the game. When you finish catching up please share some thoughts and a few initial impressions just to get an idea of where you stand currently.Any questions for Mic?
I'm onto something. Mark my words.
Yeah, that "mark my words" bit is the most batshit crazy thing so far in the game.look at this confidence
this is "I'm playing ya'll with how wrong I am"
Hi welcome to the game. When you finish catching up please share some thoughts and a few initial impressions just to get an idea of where you stand currently.
No thanks.
Vote: Kalor
lol kNo thanks.
Vote: Kalor
I really dislike this. What did you expect to achieve voting in the first place if not more information? You haven't made any action to question, investigate or expound on why you're no longer interested in going through with the vote, you just caved under pressure. This is all kinds of opportunistic.UNVOTE
What, Kalor has a big role I don't know about? Did he claim?Kalor is too quiet for his big role.
Anywhere. Not sure where to put it on yet, considering my options first.
Do we have ANY definitive role claims?
Nah yo
Then what was this all about? Was it just about him being a conversation topic, because that's stretching a bit.Do we have ANY definitive role claims?
Kalor is too quiet for his big role.