Because it'll be much cheaper if you want a little while longer and it's not as if there's a shortage of AC games. They're not multiplayer either so you're not 'missing out' on any event type shit either.
Plus who wants to support DEI-infested Ubisoft by paying the full price of admission anyway.
or....I can buy day 1 and do with my money as I please lol
Some of us are buying games to just play, any type of culture war shit might be irrelevant to lots of us.
This company supports this, this company is against that lol Go protest that company, get the picket sign and fight the "good fight"
but stop trying to force this shit in every thread as if majority are buying or avoiding a video game for any of theses reasons.
LOL a samurai wouldn't mistreat its own weapon and randomly slice things like fruit ninja since that would damage the blade in a instant. And wearing full armor when he's not in a battle just shows you how little attention ubisoft actually pays to the small details.
The actions you see is to show those things can be done in the world and this is a player agency type thing, as in you choice to do what you want.
You can play the game avoiding damaging fruit, you can remove the armor when not in battle etc, thats up to you, that isn't something the game forces you to do. You can wear armor at any time in Ghost Of Tsushima, using this odd logic THAT game is having little attention to detail lol I'd rather have the free choice to remove and add armor, then to have it forced based on ideology, let the player decide.
Ironically I actually personally had an issue with some of this in RDR2 as in it is a game that has a meter based on some moral idea of being a good guy or a bad guy but the game actually forces a direction for Arthur to be a good guy despite him being an outlaw and even giving the option to be bad in the first place lol
Which means your perspective of what you think a samurai is in regards to their behavior is based on free agency, The player ultimately decides how they would behave in any type of open world kind of like how you could play GTA in obey all the laws or something, Someone could watch that footage of that game of you playing and it would be weird to question GTA as a series simply because you saw someone obeying the law questioning If the developer understands crime lol
It would be dumb to stop someone from obeying the law in GTA, it would be dumb to FORCE the armor off or stop the sword from being used outside of combat in some battle, it makes zero sense.
What game do you even know of where its forcing you to only have the armor on in battle and stopping you from using a fucking sword randomly? lol Cause i got to tell you Newtype....that sounds just awful lol
IFireflyl
Valhalla ruined these games for me. You can tell a lot of work and effort went into but the end result is 100 hours of completely bland, vanilla content. It’s not bad. It’s not good. It just exists.
