-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Assassins Creed Unity Leaked PS4 version shots (Confirmed 900p / 30fps)
- Thread starter valkyre
- Start date
This game is made by Ubisoft, this is how they do. Remember the trailer for Watchdogs and then how it looked when it was released? I expect modders to find graphical improvement code for the pc version of Unity like they did for watch dogs lol. Ubisoft loves to take the hype train to 11 and then right when we are all excited they pull the rug out from under us and release a game with last gen graphics.
Sam Bishop
Neo Member
I've been told Spaceology is the real deal... perhaps we can Space Star Order the non-direct capture Unity footage/screenshots of our dreams?
DING!
Haha well I guess it was bound to happen someday.
martino
Member
ff12 has jaggiest texture of the ps2, character is huge step back because of the somewhat open areas but they are really really polygonal even for ps2....
I'll never understand the technical hype for this game.
If no card exists that can run the game consistently above 60 FPS, then I excpect zany good graphics. Far Cry 3 didn't have zany good graphics.
Edit: Maybe "absolutely awful" was an exaggeration. The game ran fine; but definately not great, or as good as people are saying.
Shin-Ra
Junior Member
PS360 games could render the HUD at native 1080p and upscale everything else.
There's plenty of Xbone games with sub-1080p HUD.
Dyson Industries
Banned
You are joking.
Darryl M R
Member
I guess I'm getting this on X1 since it doesn't matter.
zkorejo
Member
I am not.. this:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1522746621302174&set=vb.1509363155973854&type=2&theater
looks exactly (apart from the weather) like the XB1 preview videos.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
Why not just skip it and send a message? Ubisoft needs some humbling.
keltickennedy
Member
Holy shit, the scale!!
Looking at three benchmarks right now. Neither a 670 nor a 7950 can run the game at 60+ FPS.
http://www.sweclockers.com/recension/17772-amd-radeon-r9-290x/7#pagehead
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/far-cry-3-performance-benchmark,3379-6.html
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/far-cry-3-graphics-performance-review-benchmark,6.html
Damn, this looks amazing. To bad Facebook is not very good for media like that.
You are right. Nobody is using their eyes when playing video games anyway. It's not about the graphics.At all.
LordOcidax
Member
Did Ubisoft says that?
This is barely better than ps2...
Hyperbole?
My concern: where are all the shadows in this game? Everything looks like it is floating. Nothing is grounded.
Did you miss the part where I said maxed except for AA? All those benches have 4xMSAA. Also I presume these are cards at stock speeds, whereas mine was overclocked to 7970 levels at least.
I'm being completely sincere and not at all hyperbolic when I say that I've seen SNES Mode 7 graphics that look better than this. If you disagree then you might consider going to the optician, because you are obviously very blind.
Various Artists
Banned
Wow is that really what its going to look like in game? If so that looks like garbage to me.
TimeEffect
Member
I have never really touched the AC IP.
Played AC1 and some of some other one... but I am really considering maybe purchasing this down the road.
Played AC1 and some of some other one... but I am really considering maybe purchasing this down the road.
Shin-Ra
Junior Member
Including the severed heads.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
bananafactory
Banned
IMO you should try Black Flag. It was my first AC and I absolutely loved it. The pirating stuff is so fun. You can probably find it for cheap too.
The only time when "its not about the graphics" is applicable, is when the gameplay is absolutely rubbish by trade-off. Gameplay can claw back and entertain without "graphics" tipping the overall rating of the game to "fun + enjoyable" but AAA gaming is all about the eye-candy and will always be held on a pedestal and judged with its competitors.
A game WITH eye-candy and amazing gameplay, can become GOTY material and is what can set itself apart, but excluding graphics is imo disingenuous.
zenosparadox
Member
I assumed that the screenshots would not look too bad considering GAF likes to freak out way too easily about this kind of thing.
But I am surprised how bad it looks. It is really, really awful. Someone at Ubisoft has to be ashamed of the way it looks, right?
But I am surprised how bad it looks. It is really, really awful. Someone at Ubisoft has to be ashamed of the way it looks, right?
alice_kiss_lara
Banned
looks like crap
pre-order cancelled
pre-order cancelled
TimeEffect
Member
Yeah, good idea
I think though, like with a lot of other big AAA IPs, the attention doesn't hold me long for whatever reason. But if the story is nice enough, I think I can do a playthrough. Or maybe I can shareplay it first.
KiefbladeMaster
Member
Looks significantly worse, actually. Also, notice how the crowd density doubles from building to ground and the insane amount of pop-in before he hits the hay. That looks really bad.
Lux R7
Member
From the E3 video :
Because we need to know if we're enetering a restricted area.
We can't just find out ourselves.
"Back in my play..."..yeah.
No aa puts the 670 at 54fps
http://gamegpu.ru/images/stories/Test_GPU/Action/Far Cry 3 v. 1.0.2/fc3 1920 ss.png
bananafactory
Banned
Yeah, good idea
Or maybe I can shareplay it first.
The story is pretty good, it's roughly half typical AC stuff (Assassins/Templars) and half Kenway's story (Pirate lore and his family). The latter I really enjoyed, the former not so much, possibly because I don't really know anything about the AC story.
If you want to try it this weekend I can set up a shareplay session and let you try out the first hour. Add me on PSN - zeroskater18
nelsonroyale
Member
It doesn't look worse than the Xbone footage at all...apart from poor quality footage compression. You must be tripping...
Darryl M R
Member
I agree completely, but my girlfriend loves the AC series and I plan to get it with the bundle of X1. I hope Ubi doesn't screw up with The Division. I don't want another Destiny.
WHAHAHA, they actually said this? May I have the link so I can have a laugh?
Based on these screens, AC:U isn't even allowed to wipe Shadow of Mordor's ass in terms of visuals. It's almost sad that a cross-gen game looks significantly better than a current-gen only game that apparently has been in development for 3+ years. And I assume it will look a little better in motion, but SoM's screens look way crisper than AC:U.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
This should be added to OP.
Demons Souls looks quite bad but still won GOTY awards. Dark Souls looks a bit better but still not on par with the best of its peers.
Xenoblade was only 480p yet was one of the best games last gen as another example.
I'm not saying graphics don't matter but some people are definitely not as concerned about this stuff as some of us might be.
They've...always had that message on the screen?
zkorejo
Member
Heh.. All I can say is that the best way to tell if someone is whipping out the hyperbole is that they insist with as straight a face that they're not being hyperbolic. ;-)
Agreed!