CyberPunked
Member
It's just like the Watch_Dogs one again. That ended up looking pretty good:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Assassins Creed Unity Leaked PS4 version shots (Confirmed 900p / 30fps)
- Thread starter valkyre
- Start date
KiefbladeMaster
Member
I didn't notice nearly as much pop-in or low quality textures in that demo, but to each their own.
Fair enough, but then I wouldn't consider it maxed out. And the overclock probably won't be enough.
It's just like the Watch_Dogs one again. That ended up looking pretty good:
I'm not sure what your point is, but that's clearly not a console screenshot of Watch Dogs. In fact, a reverse Google search shows this is a 4K PC screeenshot downsampled to 1080p.
Pretty sure everyone knows.
http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/assas...y_is_900p_30fps_on_both_ps4_and_xbox_one.html
Messofanego
Banned
What I played 20 minutes of it, it really paled in comparison to Shadow of Mordor in terms of stealth, combat, and traversal. But this is coming from someone who's never liked the Ass Creed games.
nelsonroyale
Member
Texture pop up was clearly there...As for low res textures...go watch the youtube footage. That will give you all the impression of low res texture you could wish for. Let's compare like with like shall we...There is no gamersyde footage of the PS4 version yet.
Yeah, they really should have a nemesis system in AC. The system is singularly 10 times more fun then any of the side mission stuff that AC has delivered. Well, the ship stuff was cool mechanically, but involved a lot of trudging about...
I've responded to their bullshit by not buying their games the past few years.
Same with EA.
If anything of theirs interests me, I just borrow it from friends or buy used.
Why? This one look good.
HORRORSHØW
Member
i'll pass.
It was enough, trust me. Someone on the last page posted a benchmark without MSAA that showed a 7970 at 68fps average. I was most certainly running it at a solid 60fps with their FXAA solution. The trick for me was running it in fullscreen windowed mode, as normal fullscreen gave me poor performance and and significant input lag for some reason.
Vire
Member
It's not a bad solution, but there isn't much else this fall that excites me. Almost every single game is a sequel to franchises I really don't give a shit about. I did at least enjoy AC4...
Shin-Ra
Junior Member
It's totally your fault if we don't get more good UBI games like Rayman.
funkystudent
Member
Its really sad that due to "reasons" they are actually releasing a game that looks worse then a launch game.
And AC4 created so much needed goodwill after 3. They are making mistakes you shouldn't be making with your golden goose.
And AC4 created so much needed goodwill after 3. They are making mistakes you shouldn't be making with your golden goose.
Nah, things don't work that way. There was a whole lot more of controversy regarding Watch_Dogs, yet the game is sitting at nearly 9 million copies sold. AC:U is a highly hyped installment in their biggest franchise, and there's no doubt it'll sell well.
This is Assassin's Creed we're talking about here. Gameplay has never been its strong suit. Poor combat, boring traversal (hold down one button), uninspired missions, and so forth.
*I haven't played Black Flag, though. I've heard the naval stuff was fun.
I don't count AA as part of max settings but feel free to do so. A 670 could average 30fps with everything maxed + 4xMSAA.
That's very impressive performance considering how good FC3 looked.
I don't know for sure if it was perfectly optimized but it was a fantastic PC experience for me.
I have no doubt Unity will be the same. But I don't shoot for 60fps locked, I'm fine with anything between 30 and 60fps. Inconsistent framerate is not a problem at all for me as long as the framerate is high enough.
30fps locked is not preferable to the above for me.
matrixman92
Member
lol, all the stuff you listed is getting changed in Unity
Green Yoshi
Member
It's just like the Watch_Dogs one again. That ended up looking pretty good:
Yes, because with a powerful Gaming-PC you can always force a good IQ.
Allnamestakenlol
Member
Wow - I'm not sure what I was expecting, but it certainly wasn't that soupy mess...
It is? I haven't been following its development much, but that's good to know.
I'll keep my eye on it then.
zkorejo
Member
2 more videos by the same guy:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1522830861293750
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1522830051293831
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1522830861293750
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1522830051293831
Lux R7
Member
Yeah i know, don't mind me. I just have a problem with most of the AAA games that just "hold your hand" anytime.
I expect games to run a little better than that on a $300+ video card.
It's just like the Watch_Dogs one again. That ended up looking pretty good:
I see Ubi has been busy hiring GAF insiders
They would benefit greatly from a delay. Though they've been at it for almost 4 years now on this title.
Forgive me D:
Vire
Member
What version is this? The framerate in the first video is all over the place.
Vulcano's assistant
Banned
I don't know what to expect of The Division now, even on PC.
Honestly it's hard to comment on low-res videos like this.
Maybe someone can see if it's 30fps?
SJRB
Gold Member
O my fucking god they didn't fix the ultra-loud footsteps.
CLOP CLOP CLOP
Drives you insane after a mere 5 minutes.
I don't considering how technically impressive the PC version of FC3 was. I was pleasantly surprised with how well it was optimized.
With the right featureset you can bring down absolutely ANY GPU.
Speaking of which Unity will probably be a very hard game to run at 60fps consistently with all the Nvidia tech they're implementing, I can see the 980 having issues maxing the game out with MSAA/TXAA, at 1080p.
HORRORSHØW
Member
has CrossingEden been here to help quell the masses?
Muffdraul
Member
I see a reasonably good looking and fun looking AC game.
CassidyIzABeast
Member
Sounds like he did serious damage to his back at the 45sec mark in the first vid when jumps in the buggy
Still lookes pretty good to me, Lighting wise, and edges are pretty phenomally clean as far as I can tell. But yeah detail is nowhere near as close to the reveal. And sems we have lost atmoshpherics/smoke. I suppose this isnt really surprising with Ubisoft. Games sounds like it should be pretty good though.
Frame rate is hitting the lower 20's frequently....
fallingdove
Member
So they say. Except, they have been saying this same thing since the first game.
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
I see the framedrops too, but one thing's for sure, those 720p videos definitely look better than the leaked screenshots in the OP. Guessing that the day one patch will be needed for this game.
ROUGE_BLOCK
Member
As I thought the game looks way better in motion. Also those combat animations have me excited. Everything from elbowing the guard in the face, to when he stabs the other one in the throat was so fluid.
Excitement continues to build!
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
It was from a Bombcast, here is the Gaf thread on it.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=913010
artsi
Member
Why, why use FB to upload videos? It's the worst quality.
KiefbladeMaster
Member
Yeah the low framerate and the sword loosely dangling around/clipping despite the fact that he just stuck it through a guys face looks fantastic.
UtterlyPerplexed
Member
Quelle surprise...