ToTTenTranz
has a point with the Steam Deck having plenty of issues at launch. You might be comparing this to a current Steam Deck,
but that's not a fair comparison, and it is crucial to point out to people inquiring that Steam Deck also had plenty of issues at launch.
Yes it is. Do you know why? You're paying similar money if not more, today. Now if it were cheaper due to you essentially beta testing a product and helping them work out any kinks it might have vs the competition then fine, but that isn't the case here.
Sorry, I see this sentiment all over the place (particularly in the gaming sphere for some reason) it's nonsense and it's grating.
"so and so storefront has just launched, go easy on them, we can't expect them to have the same amount of features as what else is out there" - well the games are not cheaper so why should I or anyone else for that matter care?
"It's so and so studios first game, blah blah" - don't care, unless they are doing something unique that I can't experience elsewhere then I'd rather play the better version of whatever they've come up with.
If a new electric car brand launches today or an existing manufacturer puts out a new electric car then what do you think the auto industry will compare it to? That's right, Tesla of
today, not Tesla of 5 years ago. It's these company's duty to test their products to ensure they are robust enough to stand up against whatever competitors exist at the time they are launching. Further to that it just echos what's been discussed in
this thread. For some reason we have lost our way and been conditioned into thinking it's ok for products to not work as they should at the time of purchase. As a consumer if I wanted to experience what is essentially "baby's first steps" then I'd have a child of my own.
If Asus want to launch a product today and ask money for it then it's
their duty to ensure its ready, works as it should and is worth the money they are asking for it. If someone thinks that's the case as it is today and the value proposition is correct for them then fine. It's not however your duty as a consumer excuse them, justify what they are doing, test it for them and help them make it worth it (if the situation is that it's not ready to go to market and it's not worth it vs the other options out there). If they expect that of you then
you should be getting paid, not the other way round.
Mini-rant over but it's important that people realise products improve by us demanding more, not making excuses for them. In an ideal world the ROG ally launches and it's better than the Steam Deck from a usability standpoint, that way Valve are also pushed to improve and adopt any innovations that Asus might have come up with where applicable. But right now as it stands, it's just the raw hardware that is better, something that valve can easily remedy through releasing a steam deck with updated internals, it's not pushing them in any other way. Internally they will view this the same as any other newly released windows based handheld PC out there.