How does that analogy work? It's to spite another person's face.Jamesfrom818 said:Because cutting off your nose to spite your face is such a brilliant idea.
Would Verizon sell a phone running an AT&T operating system, or vice versa?
How does that analogy work? It's to spite another person's face.Jamesfrom818 said:Because cutting off your nose to spite your face is such a brilliant idea.
Always been fine for me. Maybe I've just been lucky.RBH said:How has tmobile been for you in Atlanta? Everyone I know with tmobile in the metro Atlanta area has always complained about dropped calls and such.
How much do you pay now?Kodiak690 said:I only have myself and my mother on my family plan. My gf is with her family. My mom can barely text, much less use a smart phone. If I go with sprint, It's going to cost me a good $30+ more per month. If they had a plan with fewer minutes (we use very few per month), that was cheaper, it'd probably work. Not everyone needs unlimited everything, and I'm not paying for it if I don't need it.
Sprint is great if you have 2+ people who use a ton of minutes/data/texts. But they don't work for me.. Unless they would release a plan with maybe 500 minutes per month.
Plus the reception is terrible where I work (where I would want to tether 90% of the time) with Sprint.
Kccitystar said:They already do. It's called the Everything Data 450 for 69.99. It's their bread and butter, I believe.
claviertekky said:*facepalm*
You don't know what you're talking about.
T-Mobile's dreadful in the northeast suburbs. Lots of dead zones.RBH said:How has tmobile been for you in Atlanta? Everyone I know with tmobile in the metro Atlanta area has always complained about dropped calls and such.
It's already called AT&T Mobility. They're close enough. Maybe AT&T Mobili-TDMeisterJ said:So I guess AT&T will now be called AT&T-Mobile?
DrFunk said:On the positive side, buying unlocked phones just got a load easier since all GSM bands onw operate under one telco
Your choices are limited then.Kodiak690 said:Yeah, I've only been researching it for the last two months because I want to switch from AT&T to a carrier that will allow me to have unlimited data.
In the event of the deal failing to receive regulatory approval, AT&T will be on the hook for $3 billion to T-Mobile -- a breakup fee, they call it -- along with transferring over some AWS spectrum it doesn't need for its LTE rollout, and granting T-Mo a roaming agreement at a value agreeable to both parties.
Y2Kev said:It's already called AT&T Mobility. They're close enough. Maybe AT&T Mobili-T
I've had no issues with AT&T either. It's certainly a case-by-case basis when comparing the quality of AT&T in different locales.Malleymal said:Am I the only person that has no problem with AT&T ?? I have the same bill every month, they just gave me free mobile to mobile calling so now I only
Lose minutes when I call landlines. All for like 90 bucks and unlimited everything else... What am I missing?
numble said:How does that analogy work? It's to spite another person's face.
Would Verizon sell a phone running an AT&T operating system, or vice versa?
You enjoy paying a ton for mediocre service.Plasmid said:So is this bad? I'm an AT&T customer, have been for almost 2 years now, but i dont' see why this would be shitty for AT&T customers, as opposed to being horrible for T-Mobile due to the bills.
claviertekky said:Your choices are limited then.
It's either Sprint or a Sprint Reseller (i.e. Virgin Mobile, Boost).
Kccitystar said:They already do. It's called the Everything Data 450 for 69.99. It's their bread and butter, I believe.
claviertekky said:You enjoy paying a ton for mediocre service.
Seda said:I ask again, Verizon's 30 dollar data feature says "Unlimited". Is this just bs?
Competition in general is good. However, you're going to have to explain to me how this move is competitive in the first place and pro-consumer.Gallbaro said:You think you would have networks capable of HD Video without competition?
I don't need to read any further, the answer is yes.Plasmid said:So is this bad? I'm an AT&T customer
claviertekky said:You enjoy paying a ton for mediocre service.
We're getting closer and closer to an industry controlled by two single carriers.Plasmid said:So is this bad? I'm an AT&T customer, have been for almost 2 years now, but i dont' see why this would be shitty for AT&T customers, as opposed to being horrible for T-Mobile due to the bills.
For what plan is this may I ask?Seda said:I ask again, Verizon's 30 dollar data feature says "Unlimited". Is this just bs?
Plasmid said:I'm not paying for it.
Andrex said:Yeah, and that I am happy about. The rest... not so much.
At the very least it may push Google to make the next Nexus actually work on Verizon.
X-Frame said:Why couldn't AT&T just spend that $39 billion on making a better network?
That's too difficult. Why do so when you can buy some other company that already did some of the work for you?X-Frame said:Why couldn't AT&T just spend that $39 billion on making a better network?
claviertekky said:For what plan is this may I ask?
I know for LTE there's a cap for 5GB a month.
Article said:Many analysts had expected otherwise and said the carrier would use ThunderBolt as a way to end unlimited data plans, although that step could still occur in a future Verizon announcement..
X-Frame said:Why couldn't AT&T just spend that $39 billion on making a better network?
claviertekky said:For what plan is this may I ask?
I know for LTE there's a cap for 5GB a month.
linkboy said:And I really hope the FTC does their damn job and prevents this from going through. All AT&T is doing is rebuilding themselves after the breakup back in the 80s.
claviertekky said:For what plan is this may I ask?
I know for LTE there's a cap for 5GB a month.
So you're just trolling. Good for you.
Seda said:I ask again, Verizon's 30 dollar data feature says "Unlimited". Is this just bs?
WickedAngel said:Why do that when you can buy an existing network and the subscribers to go with it?
Because they'd still have to spend money convincing people on a competing carrier to join them. This way they can simply force them to.X-Frame said:Why couldn't AT&T just spend that $39 billion on making a better network?
X-Frame said:Why couldn't AT&T just spend that $39 billion on making a better network?
GoldenEye 007 said:Does CDMA allow for data use and voice calling at the same time? Has LTE alleviated that at all?
Yeah, AT&T was just bleeding customers with its almost non-existent Android lineup...Jamesfrom818 said:How many subscribers do you think Verizon would lose if they stopped selling Android phones? It may be hard to believe but people actually like Android and they're not using it just because they can't get an iPhone.
Verizon will not sell a phone running a competitor's OS. It's very simple. If Apple bought T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T would not sell the iPhone. Every iPhone purchase on Verizon/AT&T would be subsidizing their competitor's operations. And people would not want to buy a Google phone when their is a Google carrier anyway, the same way people would flock to "Apple Wireless" instead of buying iPhones at AT&T/Verizon.Jamesfrom818 said:How many subscribers do you think Verizon would lose if they stopped selling Android phones? It may be hard to believe but people actually like Android and they're not using it just because they can't get an iPhone.
Some of the newer phones do allow that. I know the 4G ones at least do.GoldenEye 007 said:Does CDMA allow for data use and voice calling at the same time? Has LTE alleviated that at all?
JasonMCG said:So the best carrier in America is being bought out by the worst. Fuck.
numble said:Verizon will not sell a phone running a competitor's OS. It's very simple. If Apple bought T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T would not sell the iPhone. Every iPhone purchase on Verizon/AT&T would be subsidizing their competitor's operations.