"I ain't carrying 2 freakin' belts."
Age of Brock ;_;
Well we have already seen the new belt. It. Was only a question of time. I wouldn't be shocked if it happens on RAW.
"I ain't carrying 2 freakin' belts."
Age of Brock ;_;
You're reaching. Just give credit where it's due without trying your best to look elsewhere. Batista's return was advertised for weeks and people tuned in. He did a bigger number than anyone not named Rock in the last three years. He's obviously a big name, they just botched his return.That Raw was also the follow up episode to this
I have a feeling Bryan reaching red-hot over as fuck levels helped those ratings a ton.
Well we have already seen the new belt. It. Was only a question of time. I wouldn't be shocked if it happens on RAW.
Well we have already seen the new belt. It. Was only a question of time. I wouldn't be shocked if it happens on RAW.
Have we? Where?
And yeah I bank on it happening tonight. Man, the new WWE title really didn't last long
On paper, the person to usurp Brock Lesnar should be...
Dean Ambrose
Willing to throw his body at a situation and deal with pain
Could be his style is so eccentric and sporadic that not even Paul Heyman could strategize against him
I LOVE Dean Ambrose, but you guys are insane. I'm not even sure if he'll be in a midcard title shot run after everything is done with Rollins
Have we? Where?
And yeah I bank on it happening tonight. Man, the new WWE title really didn't last long
I think Cesaro would be most believable. I mean, obviously he's been on a losing streak and you'd need to fix that, but just have him do a bunch of feats of strength. Follow what they did to make Mark Henry a legit threat after years of being a joke.
When a guy is legitimately incredibly strong, you can turn them around pretty fast I think. If you need a face... simple. Have Rusev go ape shit and beat the piss out of Jack Swagger and then have Cesaro beat Rusev. Instant legitimacy.
I LOVE Dean Ambrose, but you guys are insane. I'm not even sure if he'll be in a midcard title shot run after everything is done with Rollins
Artist visualization of brock vs Bryan
Ambrose is screaming "the one to watch" to me every time he shows up. Like he's going to end up far bigger a star than WWE realise.
Artist visualization of brock vs Bryan
Mega Man Brock heading into WM31
A picture of Triple H with the Network Logo title appeared in this thread a while ago.
But WWE seems to be very keen on burying Cesaro right now.
Not a bad idea. Right now, any babyface you throw at Brock is going to squashed and the crowd will want them to get squashed.
Alternative rendering:
I'm honestly wondering when this burial of Cesaro started. The flaw of not watching WWE 99% of the time is I'm confused as to how Cesaro went from being over at Wrestlemania 30, then teaming with Heyman, to all of a sudden jobbing to RVD on the pre-show. They messed up with him. I don't think he could ever be a top star like Ambrose or Rollins, but he'd be a solid gatekepper main eventer.
All this thread tells me is that it's all Heyman's fault. Dude who can't talk is put with someone who can, but somehow ends up ruined because of it. Maths is failing me.
I'm honestly wondering when this burial of Cesaro started. The flaw of not watching WWE 99% of the time is I'm confused as to how Cesaro went from being over at Wrestlemania 30, then teaming with Heyman, to all of a sudden jobbing to RVD on the pre-show. They messed up with him. I don't think he could ever be a top star like Ambrose or Reigns (WWE going to make this man obviously), but he'd be a solid gatekeeper main eventer.
All this thread tells me is that it's all Heyman's fault. Dude who can't talk is put with someone who can, but somehow ends up ruined because of it. Maths is failing me.
They need a segment on RAW of Seth going going backstage yelling "DOES ANYONE WANT TO BUY A MITB BRIEFCASE?"
Being "dumped on the preshow" isn't a burial. It's where you put your most accessible and fun match to serve as a gateway for people to impulse buy the show.
I think Bryan should defeat Brock, but only after having shonen style training arcs and being visited by the ghosts of John Cena and the Undertaker and all the people that will die because of Brock's reign. It will also involve Bray Wyatt turning face and giving Daniel Bryan the power of some of the most powerful souls he has taken over the years.
When I saw him earlier in the year, I thought he'd be a strong contender by now at least. They basically took a good step backwards with him, which is just crazy to me. Raw is 3 hours. I can't even watch it because it's too long, but that's a lot of time where you should be able to build a couple of guys.It hasn't been a burial. It's just been a brick wall in front of him and time has whittled his stock down to nearly nothing. He'll be back, and it won't be tough for him.
Being "dumped on the preshow" isn't a burial. It's where you put your most accessible and fun match to serve as a gateway for people to impulse buy the show.
Just occurred to me, who thinks they're going to have Sheamus face Brock at some point?
We should really kill this "believability" argument, because everyone uses it until it's a guy they want to win, then it's out the window.
Just occurred to me, who thinks they're going to have Sheamus face Brock at some point?
Plenty of wrestlers I'd want as champion that I don't think are believable in certain situations. I don't think Bray Wyatt is going to beat Brock for example, but I still want him to win.
Just occurred to me, who thinks they're going to have Sheamus face Brock at some point?
On paper, the person to usurp Brock Lesnar should be...
Dean Ambrose
Willing to throw his body at a situation and deal with pain
Could be his style is so eccentric and sporadic that not even Paul Heyman could strategize against him
Is there anyone in other wrestling promotions that could look like a legit threat to Lesnar?
How many loses does Brock have in his entire WWE career?
Has he ever lost in a 1-on-1 regular match?
I'm thinking no.
This is what I mean. You would want him to win anyway, so the "believability" argument goes out the window and doesn't matter anymore.
How many loses does Brock have in his entire WWE career?
Has he ever lost in a 1-on-1 regular match?
I'm thinking no.
It makes no sense simply because CM Punk had Lesnar beat twice last year if I remember correctly. The only reason he looks so legitimate now is because he broke the streak and just dominated Cena.We should really kill this "believability" argument, because everyone uses it until it's a guy they want to win, then it's out the window.