elfinke said:
Very good then. Religion is a tricky enough subject around the dinner table, much less over the internet, I wasn't sure where you were coming from
Not to talk from either side of the discussion but what really got to me about the whole things was this: If you believe in science, go ahead and believe in it. If you believe in God, than that is something that you should practice. Do not (and I mean DO NOT) present your beliefs in a way that possibly allows them to bypass the laws/constitution to integrate them into the education system. Either from a perspective of it seeming very insidious and also the perspective of diluting your core beliefs.
Whatever your believe in is fine with me, the way that it was done is what I had an issue with.
Remember: An Intelligent Designer is a valid theory. Just like relativity! And gravity!
PS-My favourite argument used by the textbook was this (paraphrased by me): Imagine your walking along a beach and you come across a name in the sand. Do you think the name just happened via a series of natural events? No, it's a sign that an intelligent being had been there previously and left the name in the sand. Ergo, the universe was created by a "Intelligent Designer" and we are the proof.
Congratulations, you are now a small step away from believing in God. Sorry, an intelligent designer.