codswallop
Member
"Deep web" is nothing but stuff that isn't cached on a search engine or other directory. That's all.
reptilescorpio said:At least these days the internet makes it a lot easier to track.
This might even be a bit deeper still... they have the domain suffix (or whatever) as .onion and can only be accessed via Tor.codswallop said:"Deep web" is nothing but stuff that isn't cached on a search engine or other directory. That's all.
Surely that'd only be custom DNS settings and IP/subnet restrictions (to TOR IPs) though. I'm sure if you knew what the servers expected you could change your settings accordingly and not have to use TOR.Shaneus said:This might even be a bit deeper still... they have the domain suffix (or whatever) as .onion and can only be accessed via Tor.
What are you trying so solve?Omi said:I AM SO FUCKING CLOSE TO SOLVING A PROBLEM THAT HAS GIVEN MY THE SHITS FOR DAYS THAT I JUST WANT TO YELL AND TALK IN CAPS.
CODING IS BAD FOR YOUR BLOOD PRESSURE. MAN.
jambo said:NeoGAF shirts arrived this morning! =D
Has anyone submitted any of the AusGAF ideas? I would but I'm hopeless when it comes to Photoshop.
FallbackPants said:Tell me more of this 'deep web'....I'm intrigued. How do you get to it? Why isn't it policed? Can it be policed? Wikipedia told me nothing, and I can't be bothered researching it more than that at the moment.
Megadrive said:What are you trying so solve?
http://neogaf.net/forum/showthread.php?t=432090FallbackPants said:Tell me more of this 'deep web'....I'm intrigued. How do you get to it? Why isn't it policed? Can it be policed? Wikipedia told me nothing, and I can't be bothered researching it more than that at the moment.
jambo said:It wasn't naming him that was mean, it was the incredibly bitchy and snarky way she went about it describing the date. This is something that this guy has poured his heart and soul in to, taking up a huge chunk of his life, and she just dismisses it as something in the same category as Pogs.
Plus she was the one who pushed the issue. He casually mentions it, then she asks him more questions about it whilst laughing at him and judging him inside her head. And that strike one, strike two, strike three stuff is absolute bullshit.
Disgraceful article, Gizmodo is a joke.
And thats why I mainly stick to handheld games, don't have to put up with that crap, you get one version of the game, sometimes developers like Atlus release awesome packs with CDs of something. But for the most part its the game and no worrying about stupid limited editions or DLC codes.RandomVince said:So anyone else managed to jump off the new release/AAA hype cycle/DLC wagon?
Just saw the Gears 2400 spacebuck subscription service. Not a game I was going to get, but it seems to me that the levels of absurdity the games industry is reaching are too much for me.
Even C-grade game releases like Borderlands, Bulletstorm and Alpha Protocol even get that shit now.
Let's try create the most ridiculous tiered pricing for a product release ever:
Hypothetical Game X:
Regular edition with discounted online pass code
Steelbook edition (retailer exclusive) with free online pass
Limited Edition - 4 retailer exclusive flavours, each with different character costumes, avatard rewards, limited period (6 month worth) online pass, preorder access to beta for the sequel
Collectors Edition - same as limited edition, bonus 30 page artbook and download voucher for a CD soundtrack
Ultimate edition - same as collectors edition, plus a statue of the main character's pet dog, a carry bag and a 12 month online pass valid for a 10% discount off the DLC due 2 months after release and an ULTRA RARE downloadable weapon that is either gold/fluoro pink/camo patterned. Only 3 million produced, all individually numbered and RRP of $299.95.
Then people have the gall to complain about Super Mario All Stars Wii sold at $40.
Fuck this industry.
RandomVince said:So anyone else managed to jump off the new release/AAA hype cycle/DLC wagon?
It did the rounds on twitter before I saw it on GAF, and the sentiments of those on my twitterfeed were decrying the shameless grab for hits from Gizmodo, which is a valid criticism of the site and the article in question. Then I load up GAF and the discussion is all 'LOL sharp knees'.legend166 said:I've still never bought any limited edition or DLC (apart from Rock Band songs). Staying strong.
Also, has anyone else read that thread on OT about the Gizmodo article on dating the Magic dude? Sure, naming the guy was mean, but the amount of vitriol in that thread and from the 'nerd' community on the internet is amazing. Honestly makes me uncomfortable reading it.
I wish I knew what any of that many lol. I've used WPF before and it was mostly harmless.Omi said:Ummm, I have a new screen I am designing which is completely dynamic in a classic MVVM style, but is essentially a flow chart looking thing. What I needed to solve was how to draw in the connections between the dynamic objects in a nice way that made sense and didn't kill the performance. Just was something new when I haven't done it with WPF before, but, man, solving it was great. Looks good now.
legend166 said:You don't think the response is entirely disproportional to the crime? Like 15 pages of people calling her an ugly bitch?
legend166 said:You don't think the response is entirely disproportional to the crime? Like 15 pages of people calling her an ugly bitch?
Adsl.. So yes.jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
3chopl0x said:Technically the connection is there and we have a phone number but we haven't plugged an actual phone in :lol
jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
It's for people to call me on (or for calling ahead for take-out) rather than for me to call people. Basically, I only have it because there's a certain segment of the older generation that treats you as not-quite-an-adult or semi-homeless if you don't have a landline.jambo said:Interesting thread in OT asking if people still had landline phones in their homes. I don't.
Anyone here got one?
jambo said:I meant more having a connected phone line, but you guys seemed to have covered that already.
To clarify, the place I'm in now and the place I'm moving in to the on the weekend both have landlines, but we don't have any services on them.
Naked ADSL2+ ftw
FallbackPants said:I was all about naked ADSL once, but after looking at plans for my new place they were more expensive than the equivalent bundle.
That's because you're basically paying for the wholesale line rental.FallbackPants said:I was all about naked ADSL once, but after looking at plans for my new place they were more expensive than the equivalent bundle.
legend166 said:You don't think the response is entirely disproportional to the crime? Like 15 pages of people calling her an ugly bitch?
Megadrive said:I wish I knew what any of that many lol. I've used WPF before and it was mostly harmless.