God damn Canon people. You guys need to upgrade to a real camera. ;P
That said, we have really been hankering for a wide angle lens at some point, we have a nice all round 24-80 and a nice fast 50mm (f1.4) for portraiture stuff. But need that wide angle gloriousness.
Nikon snob I presume?
There are a number of great wide angle lenses out there for you to choose from. I have the Canon 10-22, which won't be much use to you, though it is a great lens. Depending on your budget and needs, there will be a nice wide angle waiting for you.
The lenses I'd look at would be:
- Sigma 8-16
- Sigma 10-20
- I'd put a Nikkor lens here, but I know nothing about them
I'd lean more towards the Sigma 8-16 myself as that extra 2mm is
huge and very valuable at the wide end. If you want more reach, zoom with your feet. 8mm is godly, especially since the price difference is so small.
The bonus with buying Sigma is that you can shop around online (
DWI is fantastic) and call CR Kennedy, the Australian distributor, and tell them you found better elsewhere. They'll match the price and arrange it to be picked up at a camera store near you, full Australian warranty included.
I meant the camera's sadly staring at me, and not the focusing issue you had. The 24-105 f/4 L is great because it focuses quickly, quietly, and because the focus ring doesn't have a clutch means you can leave it on auto focus and just override if easily if you want.
Ah, righto, easy to misread. The Tamron focuses quickly, but not quietly, you'll forget the noise soon enough, it's worth the sacrifice. It doesn't have full time manual though, so don't spin the focus ring in auto focus or you'll be crying.
Don't see too many Nikons on the sidelines at sporting matches.
The D3s had a lot of sports shooters jumping ship to Nikon, though the Canon 1DX is very drool-worthy. The impact the D3s had in Australia is minimal, since Nikon is so poorly managed over here. That's why you'll still see predominantly Canon shooters at sporting events.
Haha. Just about all much of a muchness at the high end.
We have always had Nikon's so just stuck with it for compatibility.
As for Bokeh, that's why we love the 50mm, is amazing. ->
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/5014af.htm
I find the best rule when choosing a brand is mostly "shoot what your friends shoot". You can use their help, advice and also their gear. Both Canon and Nikon are so close (except in the macro game) that it really doesn't matter what you choose, hence that rule.
I find that 50mm is a bit too much on a crop camera, rendering it almost useless indoors. That's why I went for the Sigma 30/1.4, once the crop factor is added, it equates to a 48mm lens. This focal length is very usable in many situations. The main draw card of the 50mm lens is that it is the cheapest lens to make as the optics required for it are easy and cheap to manufacture (I do have the 50mm/1.8, it was under $100, you have to own one at that price).
Re: K-Rock, please don't listen to his advice, he really is a drop-kick. On the updated 50mm lens page, he can be seen saying
K-Rock said:
I never use hoods. I'd leave it in the box.
I'd leave a 58mm Nikon Clear (NC - UV) filter, or a 58mm Hoya Super HMC UV on the lens at all times. I would leave the dinky hood at home.
This is the
exact opposite of what you should be doing. Lens hoods reduce lens flare and protect your lens; UV filters make lens flare worse, reduce image quality and add some protection from flying objects to the front lens element. Unless shit is flying at your lens, leave the UV filter at home and keep that lens hood on. On the rare occasion you need the UV filter, you need it
and the lens hood.