Having recently started all-grain brewing I've noticed that the homebrewing community is also guilty of this (not to mention seeing it tons of other places like A/V forums, etc). One of my mates who started around the same time as me is always talking about how he wants to upgrade his "brewery" and all the scientific aspects, loves the terminology etc. I just want to make beer -- if I know all the science, it'll help (particularly when things go wrong), but I want to just create. I still think photography communities by and large are much worse, or at least the sort of photographers that frequently post on the Internet love talking shop rather than how to improve their craft.
I don't get it. I mean I get that people do it, by why people don't try and get the most out of what they have, rather than thinking that buying something better will make them better. Sure there are things that make it easier, and some of equipment has limitations that you have to buy your way out of, but that's not the whole of it.
With photography, the equipment is still just a dumb tool, it only does what you tell it to, and so buying better equipment doesn't make you a better photographer. I've found the one place that doesn't think better gear is the solution to all problems and won't say "nice photo" or "I like the colours" about
every single photo. You don't learn and improve by everyone telling you how great you are, you learn from mistakes and trying not to make that same mistake again, whilst making others to learn from. If no one with a keen eye will tell you what you did wrong, how will you know?
That's what pisses me off most about the internet and photo communities most of all. The world doesn't need another circle jerk over yet another HDR abomination. I don't care if "it looks like a painting", it looks like shit, it's over-processed and utterly terrible. No one tells them this, so they think they're on to something and keep pumping out even worse images that make my eyeballs bleed.
I think the most important thing is just to dive in and get a group that will work up and running. It doesn't have to be perfect, but as someone else said, anything's better than nothing. Of course it should be something you're interested in as well, otherwise it'll just end up in a heap.
Right, except the only people who get to "dive in" are the players. Meanwhile, I've read and attempted to thoroughly understand the corebook, and read or written an adventure for it and have it all thought out, so I'm not caught completely by surprise. If it's not every one's cup of tea then I get to do it all again. It's easy to say when all you have to do is turn up.
To avoid all this, I thought I'd ask the players what sorts of things they'd be open to, rather than throwing shit at them over and over and seeing what sticks. I'd have to do that on top of learning a new system, teaching the new system and feeling my way through something I've never done before. I'm not expecting a perfect game, I've never done it before so I'm expecting it to be far from that; however, I have to start somewhere.
With two people already telling me I'm taking the wrong approach, it's rather discouraging. It has crossed my mind to throw in the towel already; it's certainly a lot easier than putting in a bunch of work so everyone enjoys themselves, only for it to fall flat on its face. It's hard enough already trying to read a bunch with ADD and having your mind constantly wander off, it takes forever and is unbelievably irritating. Maybe I've bitten off more than I can chew.