Not the Intel one though right?
More like wank designs.
Also, what vpn should I use >_<? is it ok if I do one of the commercial ones?!
Hmm. How so? I can't see any crazy nanny stating, even if there is a lot of crazy talk.semi nanny state is fine
where australia is heading, is beyond ridiculous
edit: mega yes and thats what apple has said to Lateline
I don't think I'll ever understand how twitter works.jambo @jambo
lol
Collapse
Reply Retweeted Favorite
Hmm. How so? I can't see any crazy nanny stating, even if there is a lot of crazy talk.
I don't think I'll ever understand how twitter works.
Hmm. How so? I can't see any crazy nanny stating, even if there is a lot of crazy talk.
I don't think I'll ever understand how twitter works.
alcohol is probably the best example. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be controlled but look at Europe.
We have major violence around alcohol in australia because personally i think we treat it like this drink thats better than it is
we tax it high (probably due to the violent consequences generally)
we restrict where it can be drunk and at what times (generally this is ok but potentially part of the problem)
We keep telling kids its a very bad thing, making them want it even more thus leading to teenage binging
I think the highly restricted nature of the product makes people think when they go out on the weekend they have to make the most of it
In teh UK and europe you can buy beer in corner stores, supermarkets, food courts and in general they don't have the problems we have with it
Why? Personally I believe because its not seen as such a big fucking deal over there. It's a drink, you drink it if you like it. Done.
In aus its like this magical fucking substance that teenagers think is so cool and awesome because its so restricted.
Sometimes you can restrict something to much and lead to consequences unintended. (this is the argument the ciggy companies are using with black market for example, which i do not agree with). I think alcohol may be just one of those things
It will never change because no politician has the guts or brains to realise that by making something seem so bad, and so restricted, people want it more and binge on it when they get it, especially during the years humans think they are invincible (Teenage years)
alcohol is probably the best example. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be controlled but look at Europe.
We have major violence around alcohol in australia because personally i think we treat it like this drink thats better than it is
we tax it high (probably due to the violent consequences generally)
we restrict where it can be drunk and at what times (generally this is ok but potentially part of the problem)
We keep telling kids its a very bad thing, making them want it even more thus leading to teenage binging
I think the highly restricted nature of the product makes people think when they go out on the weekend they have to make the most of it
In teh UK and europe you can buy beer in corner stores, supermarkets, food courts and in general they don't have the problems we have with it
Why? Personally I believe because its not seen as such a big fucking deal over there. It's a drink, you drink it if you like it. Done.
In aus its like this magical fucking substance that teenagers think is so cool and awesome because its so restricted.
Sometimes you can restrict something to much and lead to consequences unintended. (this is the argument the ciggy companies are using with black market for example, which i do not agree with). I think alcohol may be just one of those things
It will never change because no politician has the guts or brains to realise that by making something seem so bad, and so restricted, people want it more and binge on it when they get it, especially during the years humans think they are invincible (Teenage years)
Anyone that has never been to Europe cannot say AU isn't heading down a major nanny state path. I used to think that, then i went to Europe and realised AU society is fairly restricted in what it does and when.
alcohol is probably the best example. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be controlled but look at Europe.
We have major violence around alcohol in australia because personally i think we treat it like this drink thats better than it is
we tax it high (probably due to the violent consequences generally)
we restrict where it can be drunk and at what times (generally this is ok but potentially part of the problem)
We keep telling kids its a very bad thing, making them want it even more thus leading to teenage binging
I think the highly restricted nature of the product makes people think when they go out on the weekend they have to make the most of it
In teh UK and europe you can buy beer in corner stores, supermarkets, food courts and in general they don't have the problems we have with it
Why? Personally I believe because its not seen as such a big fucking deal over there. It's a drink, you drink it if you like it. Done.
In aus its like this magical fucking substance that teenagers think is so cool and awesome because its so restricted.
Sometimes you can restrict something to much and lead to consequences unintended. (this is the argument the ciggy companies are using with black market for example, which i do not agree with). I think alcohol may be just one of those things
It will never change because no politician has the guts or brains to realise that by making something seem so bad, and so restricted, people want it more and binge on it when they get it, especially during the years humans think they are invincible (Teenage years)
Anyone that has never been to Europe cannot say AU isn't heading down a major nanny state path. I used to think that, then i went to Europe and realised AU society is fairly restricted in what it does and when.
I think most places do really. We aren't really unique in that respect. I do agree that the tax really isn't working the way it was supposed to. Higher taxes aren't going to stop people drinking, especially not if you make the taxes for premixed drinks even higher (im pretty sure that was the only time Steve Fielding has been the most sensible man in the room). People with drinking problems are going to fork out as much money as they have to. I'm sure the government knows this, but no one wants to look like a fool.The UK has crazy problems with Alcohol >.>
None of those are rules made by the state, they're things those individual schools have done. Nothing at all to do with a "nanny state".girls not allowed to do gymnastics in the school playground anymore. Kids not allowed to play sport at lunch in case they injure themselves. Its just ridiculous.
Make alcohol cheaper! $8.50 for one standard vodka cruiser just ain't right man.LEAVE ALCOHOL ALONE!
Surface is out Oct 26th MS has confirmed
LEAVE ALCOHOL ALONE!
None of those are rules made by the state, they're things those individual schools have done. Nothing at all to do with a "nanny state".
Im not talking about the UK as a major point. I know the UK has a big problem around alcohol as well but again they restrict it more than mainland europe.
In teh UK and europe you can buy beer in corner stores, supermarkets, food courts and in general they don't have the problems we have with it
I don't think Australia's alcohol problem has much to do with how restricted it is, or a perceived glorification due to restriction, but instead a general cultural glorification of reckless drinking with little to no understanding or care for the potential consequences. If anything the laid back approach to drinking is more of a problem. Having grown up in a country town, the ambivalence and ignorance towards the consumption of alcohol and the effect it has on your body is startling.
I don't think Australia's alcohol problem has much to do with how restricted it is, or a perceived glorification due to restriction, but instead a general cultural glorification of reckless drinking with little to no understanding or care for the potential consequences. If anything the laid back approach to drinking is more of a problem. Having grown up in a country town, the ambivalence and ignorance towards the consumption of alcohol and the effect it has on your body is startling.
we just need to create better education and attitudes surrounding alcohol. But since that already seems like it's too out there, I doubt we'd ever have a government take any kind of steps to limit damage other than hurr durr taxes will fix everything.Why? It's one of the worst drugs in terms of physical and social damage, yet it is legal whilst things like marijuana and ecstasy are not.
This is the longest fucking bow draw I've ever seen. Rules made by organisations which you join voluntarily have nothing to do with any nanny state.the rules are being made by an authority that makes decisions for its civilization base. The school is a government of its own....
Shutup you bloody unAustralian poofter!
Hey, we got people to wear seatbelts didn't we?Australia isn't open minded enough.
This is the longest fucking bow draw I've ever seen. Rules made by organisations which you join voluntarily have nothing to do with any nanny state.
"Nanny state" is really just a bullshit political term used by libertarians and the far right to decry regulation as such. We should all be free from the tyranny of road rules and use by dates! Fight the power!
Hey, we got people to wear seatbelts didn't we?
Generally not to public schools, but easily to private schools. In extreme circumstances you could move your kid to a different public school if you complain enough. Pretending any of this is widespread though Choc is just looney tunes territory. You're off the deep end here with this nanny state crap. I don't think you realise just how Campbell Newman the whole idea is.Parents join schools voluntarily? Not sure if you know this fred but due to population boom you cannot send your kids to out of area anymore in general, it all gets rejected.
Get fucked Karmichael Hunt.
This is how inconsistent you are Choc. Many people would say that the government mandating what individual schools can and can't do is the very definition of a nanny state! So you think the government should have more control, not less! Which is fine if you weren't arguing the exact opposite on the same page! I'm running out of exclamation marks!Do you honestly think the Government SHOULD NOT have the power to tell a school where to go with some of these regulations? especially state schools? of course they should.
No, it's like telling a cat not to be a dog. Pointless because a cat is already not a dog!telling a school not to be a nanny state, is not being a nanny state,
No, it's like telling a cat not to be a dog. Pointless because a cat is already not a dog!
Basically, don't use "nanny state" when not referring to the state. And I don't mean, like, NSW, I mean "the government".