codswallop
Member
The beta is locked at lower settings, changing to Ultra doesn't do anything apparently.
elfinke said:I'm flicking through the BF3 beta performance thread, and looking at screen grabs and it, well, doesn't look that wonderful for all the grunt EA were banging on about needing to run it. No doubt it must look a ton better in motion and without jpg compression, but stills of Crysis seemingly have more going in them? I dunno, I'm not familiar enough with the PC franchises.
I thought it was just me, but only halfway through the first page a few people started commenting on that too.
Jintor said:I only know three or four journos who are spitting game about it on twitter
I think I might venture into a physical store to see if I can get an SSD today, or at least an optical drive.
codswallop said:The beta is locked at lower settings, changing to Ultra doesn't do anything apparently.
legend166 said:Joy of Sets massive bomba ;_;
EatChildren said:Twas looking then. House hunting. We've been offered one now.
Those laws are pretty stupid. Free speech > *Omi said:Andrew Bolt found guilty of racial discrimination. That is rather disappointing.
markot said:Those laws are pretty stupid. Free speech > *
Articles "contained errors of fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language": Bromberg
markot said:Those laws are pretty stupid. Free speech > *
Choc said:News Limited at it again
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/en...-to-get-the-boot/story-e6frexlr-1226147235216
'At home with Julia gets the axe'
no you idiots, it was only going for 4 shows anyway
fuck.me.
lolChoc said:News Limited at it again
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/en...-to-get-the-boot/story-e6frexlr-1226147235216
'At home with Julia gets the axe'
no you idiots, it was only going for 4 shows anyway
fuck.me.
Choc said:News Limited at it again
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/en...-to-get-the-boot/story-e6frexlr-1226147235216
'At home with Julia gets the axe'
no you idiots, it was only going for 4 shows anyway
fuck.me.
jambo said:Can anyone whip up a quick minimalist Christmas tree for me in Photoshop please?
Choc said:what
markot said:Those laws are pretty stupid. Free speech > *
Omi said:Yah, this is true, but from the judge...
Bolt has been pushing the boundaries for years, he was bound to get caught up by either the law or some sort of media authority (snigger, like they actually do anything)
Jintor said:Yeah, free speech doesn't cover factual inaccuracy or baseless derogatory crap
evlcookie said:Damn the weather in melbourne has turned to shit.
Maybe i will catch the bus to the station if it's raining like mad. Today sucks!
They had argued that Bolt's writings offended, upset and demeaned them, and that the articles had sought to imply that they identified as Aborigines in order to gain career, social or other advantage.
Bolt's argument that as lighter-skinned Aborigines the nine had multiple identities open to them meant the case became unofficially a test of definitions of aboriginality.
Officially, though, it was a test of the balance between free speech and protection from offence.
This morning, Justice Bromberg came down in favour of racial tolerance.
People should be free to fully identify with their race without fear of public disdain or loss of esteem for so identifying, he said.
"On the basis of my findings, I am satisfied that each of Mr Bolt and the Herald & Weekly Times engaged in conduct which contravened section 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act."
Ventron said:What started this whole thing was that some people were claiming benefits and awards intended for aborigines only, and Andrew Bolt posted their photos showing how white they looked and wondered what the conditions should be to call yourself Aboriginal.
That is a legitimate thing to discuss. If you're not of Aboriginal descent but you say you are in order to claim taxpayer-funded awards then that should be within anyone's right to bring up.
elfinke said:Reading the comments section (on anything really, except YT which has the occasional gem) on these is breaking my head.
What a world.
Ventron said:What started this whole thing was that some people were claiming benefits and awards intended for aborigines only, and Andrew Bolt posted their photos showing how white they looked and wondered what the conditions should be to call yourself Aboriginal.
That is a legitimate thing to discuss. If you're not of Aboriginal descent but you say you are in order to claim taxpayer-funded awards then that should be within anyone's right to bring up.
Ventron said:What started this whole thing was that some people were claiming benefits and awards intended for aborigines only, and Andrew Bolt posted their photos showing how white they looked and wondered what the conditions should be to call yourself Aboriginal.
That is a legitimate thing to discuss. If you're not of Aboriginal descent but you say you are in order to claim taxpayer-funded awards then that should be within anyone's right to bring up.
ANITA HEISS STATEMENT ON EATOCK VS HWT
I published my first piece of journalism in 1992. It was a story about the Aboriginal Housing Company in Redfern. In the last twenty years, I have used my skills across publishing mediums and literary genres to write positive stories about Aboriginal Australia with the aim of building bridges between black and white communities.
On April 15, 2009, with a flick of his pen, Andrew Bolt in his article Its so hip to be black, managed to burn down many of those bridges, by writing words about me (and others) that discredited me professionally, while also offending, insulting and humiliating me. People on his blog also made racist remarks, that also offended, insulted and humiliated me.
I have always identified and lived as an Aboriginal woman, Im a Williams from Cowra, a proud member of the Wiradjuri nation.
Mr Bolts article suggests I made a decision to be Aboriginal which was lucky, given how it's helped her career and that I had won plum jobs reserved for Aborigines at Koori Radio, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Arts Board and Macquarie University's Warawara Department of Indigenous Studies.
What Mr Bolt failed to mention is that I am an established writer and highly qualified with a PhD in Media and Communication, and that in fact none of the jobs he mentioned were actually reserved or identified Aboriginal positions, and the Koori Radio role was actually voluntary and unpaid.
In his witness statement to the court Mr Bolt claimed to have used a photo of my mother on her wedding day as evidence to determine she, therefore I was of mixed-heritage and could not or should not identify as Aboriginal. The photo Bolt submitted was taken directly from my blog and a post I made on February 7, 2011, almost two years after he wrote his article, so his misrepresentations about me continued.
As former Chair, Deputy Chair and Committee Member of the Australian Society of Authors, I have long advocated and been part of campaigns to protect the rights of Australian authors. At the same time, I have always advocated for responsibility in writing, and an ethical approach to publishing.
I am pleased (although not surprised) with the judgment handed down today by Justice Bromberg in the Federal Court of Australia. I believe the result means that Australia will have a higher quality and more responsible media, and that to some degree the persecution of Aboriginal people in the press will be lessened. And that was why I chose to be part of this case. Australian readers also deserve better.
I thank my legal team: barristers Ron Merkel QC, Herman Borenstein SC, Claire Harris, and Phoebe Knowles, my solicitors Joel Zyngier and Nathalie Dalpethado (Holding Redlich) and Aislinn Martin (Tarwirri). Id like to express my heartfelt gratitude for their tireless efforts in seeking justice for not only the named applicants but all those Aboriginal people who were reasonably likely to have been offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated by Mr Bolts writings.
I am continuing to focus on what I love doing most, working with young Aboriginal people around the country and teaching them how to write their own stories, in the hope they too will one day have the position of privilege to publish their own words.
Finally, in the words of Dr Rosie Scott, award-winning author, former Chair of the ASA and former Vice-President of PEN Sydney an organisation who fights for the rights of imprisoned writers who dont have the free speech we so readily enjoy:
Free speech is the cornerstone of genuine democracy, but when writers publish disinformation dressed up as fact, lies as truth, slander as objective evaluation and call it free speech, they are devaluing its very essence and betraying all those who've fought for it.
Dr Anita Heiss (www.anitaheiss.com) is the author of adult fiction, historical fiction, childrens fiction, non-fiction and social commentary. Her latest novel is Paris Dreaming (Random House, 2011).
Ventron said:What started this whole thing was that some people were claiming benefits and awards intended for aborigines only, and Andrew Bolt posted their photos showing how white they looked and wondered what the conditions should be to call yourself Aboriginal.
That is a legitimate thing to discuss. If you're not of Aboriginal descent but you say you are in order to claim taxpayer-funded awards then that should be within anyone's right to bring up.
Box of Bunnies said:Are you really not seeing the disconnect between your general point and this stuff in bold?
Sure, people lying to claim benefits they're not entitled to is a legitimate concern and should be discussed. But "What are the conditions for calling yourself Aboriginal"? Really? I mean, that's pretty simple: being of Aboriginal descent.
lol? So we should go with what? 1/16th? 1/8th? Which one makes them aboriginal enough for you to qualify?Ventron said:There's a difference between 'Aboriginal" and "of Aboriginal descent". I don't call myself Scottish.
Native Americans seem to have no problem with this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_quantum_laws
Ventron said:There's a difference between 'Aboriginal" and "of Aboriginal descent". I don't call myself Scottish.
Native Americans seem to have no problem with this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_quantum_laws
Ventron said:There's a difference between 'Aboriginal" and "of Aboriginal descent". I don't call myself Scottish.
VOOK said:What's up people, I've been sick for the last day - what did I miss.
elfinke said:It's even less onerous than that in Australia - for many official positions you need an aboriginal family to vouch for you, on your behalf to satisfy the requirements. No need to prove that any of your direct ancestors are indigenous or the like.
Went for a kick of the ffooty on my smoko, bit too windy to kick straight (well I blamed the wind)evlcookie said:Damn the weather in melbourne has turned to shit.
Maybe i will catch the bus to the station if it's raining like mad. Today sucks!
Yeah it's not amazing right now. Weird as fuck weather.evlcookie said:Damn the weather in melbourne has turned to shit.
Maybe i will catch the bus to the station if it's raining like mad. Today sucks!
RandomVince said:Local release for Skyward Sword confirmed for March.
Great money in being a mechanic, you can just say everything is fucked and needs replacing and even if only 10% of people believe you it turns into a huge amount of money. Thankfully my dad is a mechanic (not a douchey one thankfully) so I can do my own bits and pieces on a car so a service only ever costs $40 or so.viciouskillersquirrel said:So I put my car in for a service expecting the bill to be ~$400 and it turned out that there were a few things wrong and it's more like $1500.
LOL! Very wishful thinking. No chance though, the media has been fucking awful for years now. Too busy trying to push agendas and make profits. Edit: Choc'dI am pleased (although not surprised) with the judgment handed down today by Justice Bromberg in the Federal Court of Australia. I believe the result means that Australia will have a higher quality and more responsible media,
Disappointing that he wasn't burnt at the stake for inciting moronic views.Omi said:Andrew Bolt found guilty of racial discrimination. That is rather disappointing.
Omi said:Andrew Bolt found guilty of racial discrimination. That is rather disappointing.
elfinke said:It's even less onerous than that in Australia - for many official positions you need an aboriginal family to vouch for you, on your behalf to satisfy the requirements. No need to prove that any of your direct ancestors are indigenous or the like.
I don't recall how centrelink works, but I do remember many arguments taking place during high school that went along the lines of Andrew Bolt's, among those kids who were entitled to all kinds of benefits after proving their heritage and those who could not.