Omi said:lol.
Edit: I hope you are being sarcastic. Really.
btw, can you post what you mean by this?
Omi said:lol.
Edit: I hope you are being sarcastic. Really.
Choc said:the day is early but one of the usual culprits has managed to sort it out, all im sayin
HolyCheck said:btw, can you post what you mean by this?
Jintor said:I hope Serrels (or Tracey) runs a story on how Uncharted 3 actually made its street date.
Jintor said:I hope Serrels (or Tracey) runs a story on how Uncharted 3 actually made its street date.
Gazunta said:Happy Feet Two: The Video Game demo is up on PSN. Maybe it will be up on XBL tonight?
It's a video game. I "did" bits of it.
I would think Assassin's Creed Revelations is as big or bigger than Skyrim, so add that to the list.Gazunta said:The day's early yet Choc.
So after Uncharted there's Mw3 and Skyrim, anything else big that we're watching for breaks?
Happy Feet 2 on December 7 excluded of course
Gazunta said:The day's early yet Choc.
So after Uncharted there's Mw3 and Skyrim, anything else big that we're watching for breaks?
Happy Feet 2 on December 7 excluded of course
Bernbaum said:The suits in commercial want to take me to lunch at the titty place but I'm wearing a corporate-branded polo and it's a potential PR concern.
FUCK MY LIFE FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS.
jambo said:I used to be firmly in the "owning the game camp," but after some rumination on the subject I've moved to the "owning a license to play game" camp.
RandomVince said:Functionally, you do own it. You can lend it, resell it, keep it or whatever. It is exactly the same as owning a book. What you dont own is the copyright on it.
If any industry pushes too hard on the "you dont own it, trollface" line, the prices will crash as people will stop buying.
Omi said:As jambo says, essentially you don't 'own' the game, you just have a licence to play it. (yes, second hand sale blah blah whatever), but it is true.
I would argue that goes for a lot of products these days, not just those that are digital. You have a licence to use said product, but don't really 'own' it.
midonnay said:Is Joe hockey deliberately sabotaging Abbott?
why didn't he just say nothing or "no comment" rather than "well yes, Qantas did tell me about the potential for a lockout before hand"
Jintor said:I don't even know what you're talking about half the time, Vince
ShyGuy said:By any chance has anyone gotten Uncharted 3 yet? (via street date breaking!)
If so, where!?
LOL no...there was a mention in the previous page, and then this page was all about "owning a licence" and stuff like that.Marshmellow said:Did you just post and not read anything on this page?
ShyGuy said:LOL no...there was a mention in the previous page, and then this page was all about "owning a licence" and stuff like that.
So I thought I'd just quickly ask if anyone had actually gotten it yet...via a broken street date.
No good?
Need professional help with the minefield of software licensing? Random and Vince Lawyers are here to help. At Random and Vince, we will fight to get every one and zero you deserve. No license agreement too big, no case too small. Our old-fashioned approach will give you piece of mind, because at Random and Vince, we believe that if you can fit it on a DVD it's yours and nobody can take away that right, not even you when you sign a contract saying otherwise.RandomVince said:Pay attention then.
All I'm suggesting is that if these companies think you "dont own it", then I'd love to see what they consider grounds to revoke your "license" and stop you playing it. Because we have all broken the agreements they impose every time we lend it to a friend or attempt to resell it.
Obviously the rights holders don't seem intent on enforcing the "license only" model, so does that constitute an abandonment of the license only model in a functional sense?
ie we own what we buy, just as always.
RandomVince said:Pay attention then.
All I'm suggesting is that if these companies think you "dont own it", then I'd love to see what they consider grounds to revoke your "license" and stop you playing it. Because we have all broken the agreements they impose every time we lend it to a friend or attempt to resell it.
Obviously the rights holders don't seem intent on enforcing the "license only" model, so does that constitute an abandonment of the license only model in a functional sense?
ie we own what we buy, just as always.
RandomVince said:I'm assuming productivity software is somehow regulated differently (or actually regulated accordiing to the letter of the law) since you can make money from it. Or it enables you to operate a business.
Games have no productivity benefits whatsoever.
Choc said:Serrels may disagree with this, and Jintor
Without games, they aint got a job
Jintor said:So you're basically arguing that because the distributor/publisher rights that you sign away aren't enforced en masse that they don't exist?
My point is that software is software is software. It shouldn't matter whether it is for entertainment, productivity or something automated.RandomVince said:I'm assuming productivity software is somehow regulated differently (or actually regulated accordiing to the letter of the law) since you can make money from it. Or it enables you to operate a business.
RandomVince said:The publishing industry says that second hand sales and lending to friends (unauthorized) is illegal. I'm saying it is legal.
Which side seems more absurd?
MrSerrels said:I was out this morning and was shitting myself that it would break and I couldn't cover it/use Vooks' template!
codswallop said:Interesting... Wikipedia says that the 'Robin Edition' of Arkham City was supposedly exclusively available to Game and Gamestation in the UK, but OzGameShop has it.
RandomVince said:The second, in the middle, is licensing. Licensing serves no real purpose if copyright exists. Copyright essentially says "don't pirate" and that's legitimate. Licensing says dont lend it to a friend, display in public, resell it, hire it, broadcast it or use it outside the home. Further, resale is expressly prohibited unless authorised by the publisher, according to the manual I just checked then. It also says the same about rentals, but I figure we all know that blockbuster pay more for a rental copy so I wont argue that.
So what company X says is that I need to get a written letter from them before I'm allowed to sell it to a third party, be it jb, eb or a mate down the road, or on ebay.
If you agree with licenses jintor, as you said earlier, then you must never ever sell or lend your games to anyone.
Further, licenses are region limited, so it is also violating the license if you import games as well. Or sell them overseas like a limited edition of Infamous 2 to a Scandinavian AusGAF visitor.
So since I can only assume you are pro-license, and have never imported, loaned, sold or bought a game used, then you most certainly aren't a hypocrite in which case I cordially invite you to notify Warner Bros Interactive that I intend to trade in my copy of Batman at EB Games Carousel, in the suburb of Cannington tomorrow morning. I trust you will arrange the necessary documentation to prevent this heinous crime from taking place.
VOOK said:Just remember there's MW3, SM3DL, Skyward Sword, Skyrim still to use that on!
BanShunsaku said:Just got an email from HN saying they've invoiced my UC3 SE preorder.
Someone on Whirlpool just got the call to pick it up.
Street date broken I guess? They haven't called me yet...
CosignedRezbit said:And leave Skyrim ALONE!