manipulate
Member
State labour is a vile pit
Bill Shorten is also simply a crook but he appears to be less of a lizardman than Abbott
Bill Shorten is also simply a crook but he appears to be less of a lizardman than Abbott
So today I was made redundant, under reasonable (as in, I accept it) terms, entirely due to the Libs restructuring (read: total fucking) of social services. Long story short; amassed frozen accounts and funding for Job Services Providers. There will be waves of redundancies through them, and anybody related to that industry.
THANKS LIBS.
Adults are in charge now!
So today I was made redundant, under reasonable (as in, I accept it) terms, entirely due to the Libs restructuring (read: total fucking) of social services. Long story short; amassed frozen accounts and funding for Job Services Providers. There will be waves of redundancies through them, and anybody related to that industry.
THANKS LIBS.
Bill Shorten is also simply a crook
10 Coalition MPs. 10 of the fuckers.Bipartisan consensus on Indigenous policy ruptured on Wednesday when several Coalition MPs walked out on a speech by Labor leader Bill Shorten calling on the government to reverse $500 million in budget cuts.
The presentation of the annual Closing the Gap report to Parliament is usually a time when both sides of politics re-commit themselves to work together to end chronic disadvantage.
But Wednesday's proceedings exposed deep differences between the government and opposition, with Indigenous leaders clapping the speech by Mr Shorten after responding in polite silence to an address by Mr Abbott.
Reads like the Gamergaters calling out people for being SJWs.Victorian Liberal MP Russell Broadbent was first to show his anger by leaving the chamber and later said he believed the partisan comments belittled an occasion that should have been above point-scoring.
"The people of Australia are calling out for leaders who can rise above the fray," he told Fairfax Media.
Good comparison. Much like their (the Coaltion's) attitude towards talking about climate change. "How dare the left politicise this issue when our blind acceptance of the status quo is perfectly apolitical and neutral."What a pack of cunts:
Coalition MPs stage walkout after Bill Shorten raises budget in Closing the Gap speech
10 Coalition MPs. 10 of the fuckers.
Seeing this:
Reads like the Gamergaters calling out people for being SJWs.
What do they want now? They want an open tender. Now they don’t understand the difference between an open tender and an evaluation process, a competitive evaluation process.
Do you know about an open tender? Anyone can compete. What the leader of the opposition wants, he wants anyone to be able to compete to provide Australia’s next generation of submarines.
He might want the Russians to compete, Putin subs is what we will get from the leader of the opposition.
We might get North Korean subs. This is what Labor wants.
Madam Speaker, of course we are exploring the potential for defence cooperation with Japan. Of course we are exploring the potential for defence cooperation with Japan.
Is this another outbreak of xenophobia amongst members opposite? Is this the latest example of the kind of ranting we saw from the leader of the opposition at the ASC ship yard a few months ago?
Abbott today in question time:
Taking some leaps of logic there that'd make anyone blush.Abbott today in question time:
Abbott today in question time:
Parliament, where you can accuse someone of being in cahoots with North Korea (even if just in a hyperbolic sense) based on nothing and with impunity.Abbott today in question time:
And later:
I think the fact that he goes on to accuse them of xenophobia just seals the dealParliament, where you can accuse someone of being in cahoots with North Korea (even if just in a hyperbolic sense) based on nothing and with impunity
The high court has ordered the immigration minister to grant a Pakistani asylum seeker a permanent protection visa after three years in immigration detention and sustained government efforts to refuse him.
The high court unanimously ruled that former immigration minister Scott Morrisons decision to refuse the man a visa was unlawful.
The minister denied the visa simply because the man arrived by boat. The immigration department had found he had a genuine fear of persecution and Australia was legally obliged to protect him.
What a pack of cunts:
Coalition MPs stage walkout after Bill Shorten raises budget in Closing the Gap speech
10 Coalition MPs. 10 of the fuckers.
Seeing this:
Reads like the Gamergaters calling out people for being SJWs.
It does show Tony's DLP roots, Reds under the Beds!
As Education Minister Christopher Pyne urges cross-bench senators to support the Government's proposed shake up of higher education, he says change is needed because of the actions of the former Labor government.
At his first media conference of 2015, Mr Pyne said: "The reason we have to do this reform of universities is because Labor cut $6.6 billion from universities over the course of their government".
This is not the first time he has used this figure. In December, announcing a new version of the legislation, Mr Pyne also said the former government had cut $6.6 billion from the sector.
The verdict
The budget papers and the Parliamentary Library's budget review show an increase in higher education spending over the life of the previous Labor government. Savings measures announced by Labor did not reduce overall funding to the sector.
Of the $6.6 billion in Mr Pyne's table, $2.3 billion relates to measures that have not been implemented and Labor is now opposing those savings in the Senate.
More than half relates to funding for students, not for universities, as Mr Pyne stated.
What's more, the $6.6 billion takes into account forward estimates for the years to 2016-17, which does not fall into "the course of [Labor's] government", as Mr Pyne said.
He is incorrect.
Abbott today in question time:
And later:
A great article from the Guardian showing the near perfect negative correlation between public and private debt. The graph is particularly on point and completely destroys the kitchen table analogy.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/11/a-sustainable-budget-surplus-is-beyond-the-governments-control-as-joe-hockey-has-come-to-realise
Understanding the graph requires a level of financial literacy the average citizen simply doesn't possess. It gets into monetary policy and delves into abstract issues that are hard to put into concrete terms.A great article from the Guardian showing the near perfect negative correlation between public and private debt. The graph is particularly on point and completely destroys the kitchen table analogy.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/11/a-sustainable-budget-surplus-is-beyond-the-governments-control-as-joe-hockey-has-come-to-realise
On Sunday, May 25, last year Queensland backbencher Wyatt Roy was part of a group of about 30 marginal seat-holders invited to dine privately with the Prime Minister in the cabinet anteroom. Abbotts practice at these dinners is to go around the room, asking each member to say their piece.
Roy, trying to be helpful, stood at the table to tell the Prime Minister that broken promises were the fundamental cause of the governments problems. It might be a good idea, Roy suggested, to apologise to people a la Peter Beattie and move on.
Abbott was furious. He rounded on Roy, yelled at him, then directed his remarks to all of them that there were no effing broken promises and no one should concede there had been. The incident stuck in the mind of MPs, first because of Roys bravery in broaching it, then because of the Prime Ministers use of the F-bomb.
Many months later Abbott was forced to concede the bleeding obvious, but only after accusations of lying about lying trashed his credibility. If he had taken the advice of his youngest MP last May, he would have spared himself considerable pain.
A leading United States think tank has published a piece posing the question, "Is Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott the most incompetent leader of any industrialised democracy?" and answering, quite comprehensively, in the affirmative.
Published on the Council on Foreign Relations website before Mr Abbott survived a spill motion on Monday, the piece argues that he has proven so "shockingly incompetent" that he deserved to lose his job.
"Abbott has proven so incapable of clear policy thinking, so unwilling to consult with even his own ministers and advisers, and so poor at communicating that he has to go," wrote the CFR senior fellow Joshua Kurlantzick, a US specialist in south-east Asian politics.
AhahahahahahahaApparently the children in detention report is "blatantly political"
Are you going on that article, or the actual piece by said think tank? Because I haven't read that yet. But of course, the comments were amazing for the article. Leftist propaganda etc.
Council on Foreign Relations said:Is Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott the most incompetent leader of any industrialized democracy? Of course, a leaders popularity, to some, depends on that leaders political orientation. Many conservative Republicans think Barack Obama is one of the worst presidents in modern history, while many liberal Spaniards think conservative Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy is one of the worst leaders in Spains modern history.
But competence and popularity are not necessarily the same things. Even conservative Republicans would admit that Obama has achieved major accomplishments in office they just do not like those accomplishments at all. And Obama, Rajoy, and other rich world leaders, whatever their problems, usually seem to be making their policy decisions based on advice from a retinue of advisors and after careful consideration of policy options. Even leaders criticized for acting too slowly, and offering uninspired policy ideas, like French President Francois Hollande, appear to be capable of running their countries day-to-day policymaking. There are world leaders who appear dangerously unhinged, making policy based on whims, advice from a tiny handful of advisers, or some other highly unscientific formula. Argentinas president, Christina Fernandez de Kirchner, comes to mind, as does Ecuador President Rafael Correa, North Koreas Kim Jong-un, or Russias Vladimir Putin. But none of these leaders run a rich and powerful democracy.
Tony Abbott, however, is in charge of a regional power, a country that is the twelfth largest economy in the world and the only rich world nation to have survived the 2008-9 financial crisis unscathed. Yet in less than two years as prime minister, Abbott has proven shockingly incompetent, which is why other leaders within his ruling coalition, following a set of defeats in state elections, may now scheme to unseat him. They should: Abbott has proven so incapable of clear policy thinking, so unwilling to consult with even his own ministers and advisers, and so poor at communicating that he has to go.
Abbotts policies have been all over the map, and the lack of coherence has often made the prime minister seem ill-informed and incapable of understanding complex policy issues. In press conferences, Abbott has offered mixed public messages about some of the health care reforms that were at the center of his agenda, and sometimes has seemed unsure himself of what health legislation has actually been passed on his watch. He also has seemed unsure of what he promised in the past regarding Australias major public broadcaster he promised not to touch it before he went ahead and made cuts to it. He also looked completely baffled on climate change issues at the G20 summit in Australia last year.
Abbott also does not seem to think it necessary to even discuss policy proposals with his top ministers and other leading members of his conservative coalition. His lack of consultation has made it harder for him to pass some critical legislation. In addition, he appears to have one of the worst senses of public relations of any prime minister in recent Australian history. At major economic summits, he has embarrassed Australia with his coarse rhetoric. He recently decided to give an Australian knighthood to Prince Philip, husband of British Queen Elizabeth II, even though nearly half of Australians would prefer the country to be a republic, and even those who support the monarchy disdain actions that look like Canberra sucking up to the British royals. Australia had not given out its own knighthoods for nearly decades, and even to many monarchists the very idea of Australian knighthoods seemed archaic. And if Abbott was going to give out archaic knighthoods, Prince Philip was a bizarre choice. Even among the conservative supporters of Abbots coalition, giving a knighthood to the notoriously gaffe-prone and fusty Prince Philip went down badly. Abbott did not appear to have consulted with most of his top ministers before deciding to give Prince Philip the accolade.
I take no position on whether a left or right coalition can govern Australia better whether Australia needs a revolt from within the ruling coalition or a national election victory by the left. But a country that for decades has punched above its weight on nearly every international issue surely can do much better for a prime minister than Tony Abbott.
those goddamn leftist babies refusing to learn to walk due to a lack of crawling spaceApparently the children in detention report is "blatantly political"
I mean who knew that something involving the arbitrary detention of minors by a government would be in some way deemed political? How strange. I could never have seen that outcome coming
Yeah, I just read it then. The first few startlingly ignorant comments are hilarious, but thankfully knowledgeable and literate commenters have set them straight. And the typical Age/SMH/Australian peanut gallery are thankfully absent.Mostly the actual piece I guess. Here it is in full:
http://blogs.cfr.org/asia/2015/02/05/tony-abbott-has-to-go/