off the national spill obsession for a second, anyone catch the Lib Senator telling Penny Wong to "learn to speak Australian"? Remark was not deemed unparliamentary.
What a grade a piece of shit.
One day Penny Wong will be Prime Minister somehow (or Lee Lin Chin) and I will laugh and laugh as the entire racist misogynist homophobic wing of politics has simultaneous aneurysms.
It has now come to light that Macdonald directed his utterly offensive comments at Scotland-born Labor Senator Doug Cameron, who has a thick Glaswegian accent. Penny Wong asked for the comment to be withdrawn, because REGARDLESS of accent, telling someone to speak Australian is a) fundamentally incorrect, and b) derogatory.
I don't think I have the stomach to read a whole book on it, but I'd be super interested if you had the time to post some bullet points or something on the subject.
I fucking knew one of the guys would be wearing a bow tie.
Also no surprise Young Liberals are the scum of the earth.
If telling a foreign-born person to speak Australian isn't deemed unparliamentary, then what the hell is.
It has now come to light that Macdonald directed his utterly offensive comments at Scotland-born Labor Senator Doug Cameron, who has a thick Glaswegian accent. Penny Wong asked for the comment to be withdrawn, because REGARDLESS of accent, telling someone to speak Australian is a) fundamentally incorrect, and b) derogatory.
The mute feature is your friend.
Always drives me mad how many normally sensible people go out of their way to be outraged at what a shock jock says. Like, stop giving him attention maybe?
Tony Abbott is fading fast. Within days of his fall hes looking like a prime minister we once had a long time ago. The drama of his execution this week was muted by the lingering disbelief that he was ever there. His government has slipped easily into the past. He is gone and barely missed.
So I guess for those of you with existing accounts, let me know when your sub is due and we'll work something out. I can't remember numbers/who exactly wanted in either, so remind meHi Shane,
Thank you for getting in touch.
Group subscription pricing tiers are based on paid members.
Therefore, if you sign up with the minimum three paid members at the 3-5 member price of $149, you will receive four subscriptions for the price of three - $447.
If you purchase five subscriptions, you will get a sixth member free, but price will still be based on the 3-5 member group size.
The free member is free for the first year only.
We will be able to add the existing subscribers to your group. The best way to do that is to work out pro-rata rates for their subscriptions, to extend them to expire at the same date as the new subscriptions. The pro-rata rate will be calculated with regards to the group's pricing tier and each of the existing members will count as a fully paid member.
If you would like to go ahead and set up a group let me know and I can organise it for you.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Kind regards,
Kim
Crikey support.
Heard back from Crikey:
So I guess for those of you with existing accounts, let me know when your sub is due and we'll work something out. I can't remember numbers/who exactly wanted in either, so remind me
And from the sounds of it, for those who have only just signed up, you might as well jump in. You'll only be paying a tiny amount and it means next year you'll have the chance to get the better price with the rest of us (and you'll possibly bring our prices down too).
That Canning result is still going to make all those MPs in marginal seats who put in Turnbull nervous.
http://www.theguardian.com/australi...-politics-live#block-55fe3b91e4b024facf8de4b1Frankly, my remaining in this job was not about me, it was all about the stability of our Defence Force in Australia and its leadership. Mr Turnbull’s decision now means there have been more defence ministers in Australia than prime ministers in the last three years. More defence ministers than prime ministers in the last three years.
Defence is meant to be a natural strength for the Coalition, but during this government it’s not always been the case.
I think I found a mistake. They had an "Honorable" in front of Dutton. And Pyne. And Morrison.
Quelle surprise?
Is the Economics Correspondent and editorial writer at The Australian.
elevating pyne & keeping dutton is a really dumb move
rip art of brandis i guess
Edit: Mitch Fifield is new communications minister welp. The dude that's all for increased surveillance powers and heavily against FTTP.
Is the Economics Correspondent and editorial writer at The Australian.
From the comments:Holy shit, it gets better (or worse, if you're him): He said exactly the same thing a few months ago and already got lambasted for it.
With all due respect discrimination is discrimination no matter where or who it is against. I have been discriminated against going for jobs also due to age and other issues however you just keep trying, Graeme is a vested interest party to this. Mr Creighton wasn't being discriminatory against people with disabilities per se as you have labelled him. Don't get me wrong I believe Graeme Innes has done a fantastic job , there are many so called able body people finding it hard to get jobs so I empathise with his friends. I would however ask what he was doing to curtail the last Labor government for running up horrendous debt while supplying what?
A crazy person said:With all due respect discrimination is discrimination no matter where or who it is against. I have been discriminated against going for jobs also due to age and other issues however you just keep trying, Graeme is a vested interest party to this. Mr Creighton wasn't being discriminatory against people with disabilities per se as you have labelled him. Don't get me wrong I believe Graeme Innes has done a fantastic job , there are many so called able body people finding it hard to get jobs so I empathise with his friends. I would however ask what he was doing to curtail the last Labor government for running up horrendous debt while supplying what?