You pay for different things in each car. Yeah so what if the CX5 has a better interior, does it also handle as well or go as fast? No, so you shouldn't compare it. Can it be better? Yes. Is it scandalous for what the car is? No.
I'm trying to justify the price with the overall package that the car offers, not just interior. Shouldn't you be blaming the dealer for the high price? If Jalopnik got a 228i for 36K then I don't see a problem with the car. I was just going to mention, isn't 44K M235i money? 228 starts at 33K meanwhile the M235i starts at 44k according to BMW's website. The one you linked didn't even have lot's of options, like the big screen for example which that one had the funny small looking idrive.You're trying to conflate the interior and performance capabilities when that's not what I'm talking about at all.
Yes we know it performs fncking amazing, but so what if it can't even have a modicum of luxury like how a luxury car is supposed to be?
If that exact car I sat in was $36K, like the one Jalopnik drove 2 years ago, then I wouldn't be here ranting against it. Hell, I probably would've taken a brochure home and talked to one of their sales rep about it, but at $44K? Yeah no.
Look I'm all for fantastic performance and spartan interiors, otherwise I wouldn't be driving a Miata after all, but that price point with a shitty interior? I can hear Infiniti's Q60 calling my name.
So I'm actually looking to buy a Jaguar XE 35t (S) R-Sport this year, but in a very specific configuration. Basically, I want it in blue (Dark Sapphire or Bluefire, have to see it in person first to make the choice) and the only extra option I want is the Adaptive Dynamics. The Tech Package is interesting, but I'd have to see it in person to see if it's worth it.
Here's a pdf of the exact configuration: Link
Seeing as how you have experience with Jag dealers, how did you go about getting your order? Is it just you tell them what you want, and they search for an exact (or close enough) match from other dealers and then deliver you that car, or will they actually "build" your spec?
How does this affect your price? Is the sticker cheaper because you don't have dealer fees? I don't want to have to maneuver around options I don't want on the car that only serve to drive the price up.
so only the XE-S gets the supercharged V6?
Yeah no there's much better looking than the XF.I also still think the last gen XF has one of the most elegant and beautiful front ends of any sedan ever - and the standard headlights preserve that look.
Yes, but it starts at a meager $41.7K ($40K invoice). Heated seats, rearview camera, 380W Meridian Audio (which is AMAZING), folding seats, etc are standard.
I just want to point out that in the Year Of Our Lord, 2016, nearly none of the Jag's competitors come with a rear camera standard.
Everything Honda sells in America has a backup camera standard. Why can't the IS, 3-series, etc. have them?
I'm sure it's so they can throw it into some "package," like Technology Package or Driver Assist Package or whatever. Mercedes lets you add it a la carte, at least, I guess.I'm pretty sure the Q50 does. But that's it. There are so many cheapo cars out there that have them standard (Nissans, Hondas, and Toyotas) that it's embarrassing when luxury cars don't. Especially as you crest the $50K mark.
I'm trying to justify the price with the overall package that the car offers, not just interior. Shouldn't you be blaming the dealer for the high price? If Jalopnik got a 228i for 36K then I don't see a problem with the car. I was just going to mention, isn't 44K M235i money? 228 starts at 33K meanwhile the M235i starts at 44k according to BMW's website. The one you linked didn't even have lot's of options, like the big screen for example which that one had the funny small looking idrive.
Probably late to this but I just realized how many interior components Infiniti shares with Mercedez. Basically they use the same key design, gauge cluster is similar only with different silver background and font for the A class but they use the same small screen in the middle with the same UI, the headlights switch on the right is the same, buttons on the door are the same,same buttons on the steering wheel, same door handle and electric seat buttons, same AC controls, the row of buttons where you find the heated seats and hazard lights are the same, the thing whatever you call it where the gear level is looks the same. What else do they share apart from some of the engines?
New steering wheels and a few changes in the plastics
What are some good forums for pics of people's cars/garages? i love looking at stuff like that. Kind of like our gaming setup thread here.
I just want to point out that in the Year Of Our Lord, 2016, nearly none of the Jag's competitors come with a rear camera standard.
Everything Honda sells in America has a backup camera standard. Why can't the IS, 3-series, etc. have them?
Only enter if you want to dream.
You have been warned.
http://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-and-rs/899286-picture-of-your-garage.html
Especially since all cars are going to require them in a couple years.I just want to point out that in the Year Of Our Lord, 2016, nearly none of the Jag's competitors come with a rear camera standard.
Everything Honda sells in America has a backup camera standard. Why can't the IS, 3-series, etc. have them?
Only enter if you want to dream.
You have been warned.
http://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-and-rs/899286-picture-of-your-garage.html
It's pretty shitty tbh. Hopefully more manufacturers make them free in the next batch of major new refreshes or something.
One thing I will say is that the 'as standard' reverse camera's in a lot of these cars (Honda, Kia etc) aren't the best in quality, especially in low light where they have quite poor light sensitivity and offer a grainy and not clear image. Even the paid ones in cars like Hyundai etc are a bit pants. At night it's like you're watching a VHS or potato cam. Comparatively, the ones in the Beemers, Mercs etc tend to be far higher quality, with better low light performance, brightness and overall clarity, presumably because the cameras have better internal sensors. I know that's little consolation because, well...you're paying for them, but it's something.
Doesn't beat this dudes commitment. Lol.
Man Loves Porsche So Much He Builds House Around It
I'm sure it's so they can throw it into some "package," like Technology Package or Driver Assist Package or whatever. Mercedes lets you add it a la carte, at least, I guess.
Only enter if you want to dream.
You have been warned.
http://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-and-rs/899286-picture-of-your-garage.html
All car forums are like that, in my experience. When I got my very first car, a 2001 Nissan Sentra, I signed up for the B15Sentra forum and felt like an ass, reading about how other people would clay bar and detail their cars everyday, rain, sleet, or snow.Fuck that thread for making me feel like a dirty pleb.
White is boring, it'll look like every other Focus on the road. Keep the blue, drive something different.
That guy Shmeee on Youtube posted a vid of his friend taking delivery of a TdF. I'm not crazy about its looks vs. the F12 but dear sweet baby Jesus it may be the best sounding car ever made.
I don't know how you guys deal with depreciation. I've looked at projected depreciation for a few different new cars i'm interested in, and most 2013 model cars bought today are slated to lose about 2k/year for the next 5 years.
I don't know how you guys deal with depreciation. I've looked at projected depreciation for a few different new cars i'm interested in, and most 2013 model cars bought today are slated to lose about 2k/year for the next 5 years.
Some cars in some regions are apparently depreciation-proof. Try buying a two or three year old WRX or STI in the PNW; you might as well buy new.
I don't know how you guys deal with depreciation. I've looked at projected depreciation for a few different new cars i'm interested in, and most 2013 model cars bought today are slated to lose about 2k/year for the next 5 years.
My FR-S has lost $6000 in the nine months I've owned it. It's disconcerting but I knew about the poor resale going in.
I don't know how you guys deal with depreciation. I've looked at projected depreciation for a few different new cars i'm interested in, and most 2013 model cars bought today are slated to lose about 2k/year for the next 5 years.
We only buy new because we don't like surprises and on average we hold onto cars for some time (and will be passing them onto the kids in a few years when they start to drive.) My FR-S has lost $6000 in the nine months I've owned it. It's disconcerting but I knew about the poor resale going in.
Some cars in some regions are apparently depreciation-proof. Try buying a two or three year old WRX or STI in the PNW; you might as well buy new.
All car forums are like that, in my experience. When I got my very first car, a 2001 Nissan Sentra, I signed up for the B15Sentra forum and felt like an ass, reading about how other people would clay bar and detail their cars everyday, rain, sleet, or snow.
F that.
Corporate rates are only better at the most expensive times of year in my experience. I could find cheaper rates online, even from the same brand, 70% of the time traveling for work.
Sixt gave me an E class Mercedes once in Munich when I booked a Focus. I'll always like them for that.
That number seems off. Are you including the taxes and interest in there as well? Cause I have my number at 8.5k in 2.5 years.
This is why you buy CPO/used.
I'm not about to dump $45k on a car that will be $32k in three years with 12k miles.
[IG]http://i.imgur.com/iEusd0B.png[/IMG]
7600 miles, excellent condition. Paid $26k. Private party is about $1k higher.
The taxes are always a loss; I never include these in calculating depreciation.
Out of sight, out of mind. Seriously. Even though I always intend to drive my cars into the ground, I just try not to think about depreciation.I don't know how you guys deal with depreciation. I've looked at projected depreciation for a few different new cars i'm interested in, and most 2013 model cars bought today are slated to lose about 2k/year for the next 5 years.
I mean, some of these are show cars, so I guess it makes sense to keep them immaculate. But then I'm always thinking, if you clay everyday, how long before you completely strip off your clear coat?I always laugh at the people on the Miata forum I visit who won't even let their cars see rain... It depends on the person and the car, but at some point a garage queen just becomes the antithesis of everything enjoyable about cars and mechanics.
My pal's WRX looks famazing, even better in person.And speaking of clear coat, how do you guys feel about the new matte coat trend? I think those cars are ugly as hell, and their owners are reminiscent of the old "my favorite color is primer" ricers who grew up and made money to buy fancy cars.
That looks sweet, but I still can't help but feel it'd look even better with a glossy clear coat.My pal's WRX looks famazing, even better in person.
So I just picked up the car with my in-laws. We reserved an Audi A3 for $140 for the whole week (which btw is insaaaaanely cheap!). And the guy was super awesome, and gave them a BMW 328i at no extra charge!
I will only use SIXT from now on. I think even for my Miami trips I'll probably just rent a car instead of using my own.
That's the thing about aesthetics, they're really subjective.That looks sweet, but I still can't help but feel it'd look even better with a glossy clear coat.
and their owners are reminiscent of the old "my favorite color is primer" ricers who grew up and made money to buy fancy cars.
I apologize for that second part, then.That's the thing about aesthetics, they're really subjective.
This
is pretty ignorant and definitely condescending though.
No worries mate, no offense taken.I apologize for that second part, then.