Septimus Prime
Member
It looks...rugged. Like something you would drive in Jurassic Park.
It looks...rugged. Like something you would drive in Jurassic Park.
So I'm close to pulling the trigger on either a used 2015 328i nearly fully loaded with only 7k miles or a used 2014 435i coupe fully loaded but with 25k miles. My commute to work is 30 min 4 times a week but I'm not too familiar with how reliable bmws are over time. It's only a $2k difference between the two but I'm not sure how much I'd miss the additional hp over the 328i.
So I'm close to pulling the trigger on either a used 2015 328i nearly fully loaded with only 7k miles or a used 2014 435i coupe fully loaded but with 25k miles. My commute to work is 30 min 4 times a week but I'm not too familiar with how reliable bmws are over time. It's only a $2k difference between the two but I'm not sure how much I'd miss the additional hp over the 328i.
Whats the length of loan term are you planning to go with? You should be good until 2020 with the CPO added 2 years right? If so I wouldn't do anything more than a 4 year loan so you're not still paying for the car out of warranty. I went the same route with CPO BMW. It provides some peace of mine. Just look over its history like alpha said, and go for it if that's what you want.
It's silly in the sense that it's pointless on a car that slow. It looks really nice, for sure. But it's absolutely pointless.
Has Toyota ever explained WHY the car has a remarkably underpowered engine? Or why they're just rebadged? Honestly a boxer powered AWD Subaru of this, and a six or four plus turbo Toyota version would be fantastic.
Depends on where you live.
Here in DFW, all I see are Miata's but even then I'm starting to see less examples of them... it's either trashed Miata's spanning all generations, or barely used examples that still cost way too much. 240's have been riced to hell and back that finding a clean example is like finding Jesus printed on your loaf of bread. RX-7/8's are still kinda around, but it's either FC's or autotragic 8's that nobody obviously wants.
Apparently it's really hard for them to pass crash test ratings when they put a turbo in.Has Toyota ever explained WHY the car has a remarkably underpowered engine? Or why they're just rebadged? Honestly a boxer powered AWD Subaru of this, and a six or four plus turbo Toyota version would be fantastic.
Yeah, I've been looking at getting an older RX-8 to mess around with, and it's shocking how few of them are for sale in my area. Fewer still are manuals. At this rate I won't find one before summer. Maybe I should just look at a used FR-S, but prices on those are still a bit higher than I'd prefer.
You'll make up the difference in apex seals. Promise.
LOL. Probably. Honestly though for a car that won't be getting many miles, and just as a toy, I'd rather have the 8 even at the same price. I think it's more fun to drive than the GT86, has a better interior, a little roomier, and so on. The reliability scared me off getting one as a daily driver a few years back, but I want one now. edit: the BRZ definitely looks better though! The 8 was ugly even when it was brand new.
240's have been riced to hell and back that finding a clean example is like finding Jesus printed on your loaf of bread.
So I'm close to pulling the trigger on either a used 2015 328i nearly fully loaded with only 7k miles or a used 2014 435i coupe fully loaded but with 25k miles. My commute to work is 30 min 4 times a week but I'm not too familiar with how reliable bmws are over time. It's only a $2k difference between the two but I'm not sure how much I'd miss the additional hp over the 328i.
Apparently it's really hard for them to pass crash test ratings when they put a turbo in.
It has enough power for most people though, and with the combination of tires it comes with, it's super easy to have fun in without going at crazy high speeds.
I agree though, I'd love to see an STi BRZ w/ 300hp.
Apparently it's really hard for them to pass crash test ratings when they put a turbo in.
It has enough power for most people though, and with the combination of tires it comes with, it's super easy to have fun in without going at crazy high speeds.
I agree though, I'd love to see an STi BRZ w/ 300hp.
Has Toyota ever explained WHY the car has a remarkably underpowered engine? Or why they're just rebadged? Honestly a boxer powered AWD Subaru of this, and a six or four plus turbo Toyota version would be fantastic.
Yeah, I've been looking at getting an older RX-8 to mess around with, and it's shocking how few of them are for sale in my area. Fewer still are manuals. At this rate I won't find one before summer. Maybe I should just look at a used FR-S, but prices on those are still a bit higher than I'd prefer.
Very nice! Which tails are those?
Part of me believes the rotary fanboys bought all of them up, removed and kept the engine so when their current one breaks, they can easily swap it themselves lolol.
Welp, color me jelly.
240's were my second choice of car after the AE86.
anyone here running snow tires on a RWD car?
I'd like to think mine fits the bill . Interior is complete, not cracking or faded. Exterior could use a few touch ups here and there, but overall body is straight with no rust. It's running like a champ and hasn't failed me in 10 years? I've had the car so long now that I can't even remember how long I've owned it.
Check the manual, usually the first 500 - 1000 miles you should keep the engine rpm under a certain rate then take it back to the dealership for a fluid change.Just got a brand new Sonata. Is there anything you guys recommend I should do to break it in or something? I've never owned a new car before.
The reason is because Toyota doesn't want to invest into the car any more beyond what it is now. And they forced Subaru to agree to a non-compete sort of agreement where Subaru is not allowed to update the power of the BRZ.
http://www.torquenews.com/1084/subaru-boss-says-series-production-brz-sti-comingwat?
Subaru has always been a conservative company and they wont produce a BRZ that will change the crash test scores. BRZ is an IIHS top safety pick and thats very important to the brand as safety is one of their core values they wont compromise. Hirakawa says until now, Subaru has ruled out a turbocharged version of the BRZ sports coupe because of turbo, intercooler and crash test incompatibilities
What's your commute like? If I were in the market for those cars, I would go with the Model S, since it has the right balance of aesthetics and performance, and I wouldn't want to deal with getting gas anymore. It's quite a bit costlier than the other cars you're looking at, though, isn't it?
Test drove a 16 STI yesterday. Fun car. Feels planted like the 370Z, but the missus was definitely not a fan of the ride. Made a fool of myself driving a stick too. It's been a couple of years and I stalled on a steep hill. That's the part I hate about driving stick in a car I've never been in before; I'd have liked to spent a few minutes in an empty parking lot to get a feel for the clutch.
Ah well - wasn't there someone here with a new Golf R? I'm going to go take a look at one of those tonight.
Agreed totally, but being so explicit for the reason they haven't drawn up plans for a turbo in specific is worthwhile to take note. I'd assume the crash rating is also part of the reason why they continually stick with top mounted intercoolers on WRXs, despite being objectively worse than front mounted intercoolers.Well of course they won't come out and say "hey, Toyota won't let us". They are engineers with an insane amount of resource, if they wanted to drop a turbo in there, they would have done it without any compromise.
I remember a news story posted on one of the auto outlets talking about how they can't because they have a mutual agreement to not have the cars compete against each other, prohibiting any changes to power.
Pretty sure I win this, I drive a 350hp Genesis in the Quebec winter.
I'm looking for a cheap'ish vehicle that I can put some miles on comfortably and reliably (Lexus GX 470 is currently in the lead - it's like a Land Cruiser in a tux and far more common!) for around 10 grand. I want to have that paid off, reliable vehicle and it doesn't necessarily have to be all that exciting.
Is this the excuse you use when your mom is disappointed in you for not having a Ferrari?Only a few months ago did he swap it for a new 2016 BMW X5 because my brother and I agreed to pay for the lease.
Agreed totally, but being so explicit for the reason they haven't drawn up plans for a turbo in specific is worthwhile to take note. I'd assume the crash rating is also part of the reason why they continually stick with top mounted intercoolers on WRXs, despite being objectively worse than front mounted intercoolers.
I wouldn't just wave my hand and say, "they'll figure it out". It could be a major roadblock given the BRZ's dimensions, and perhaps they have some other agreement with Toyota that prevents any major modifications to the body (or hood?) that would keep them from being able to adequately tackle the objective.
We can't disagree with the lead engineer just because what he says doesn't fit with our theory of what's holding back a high powered BRZ.
The other thing though is that the BRZ has a lot of room in the engine bay. And Subaru has a single turbo version of the motor running in the current WRX, among other cars. :'(
All I can think of is that Toyota is the most bland boring profit squeezing manufacturer and under the partnership wont allow a turbo BRZ since no one would buy a slow FRS/86 given the choice. They wont spend a dime developing anything other than the ALL NEW CAMRY
Pretty sure I win this, I drive a 350hp Genesis in the Quebec winter.
just thinking out loud, anyone please chime in if you have experience with electric vehicles and tax credits...
2017 Chevy Volt is $33,220.
Federal tax credit is $7,500 for the Volt + $2,000 PA state tax credit. So the Volt would be $23,720. 5-year car loan and splitting this with my partner would be roughly $213/month.
My Dodge Dart lease right now is only $150/month, but it's a lease is more expensive to operate (gas).
how exactly do tax credits work? You pay the full price of the car, and then when you are doing your taxes the following year you get a rebate check??
I was thinking about a 2017 Prius, but it's only ~$1,000 cheaper than the Volt as the Prius doesn't get any federal tax credit.
OH.... ok. Well sometimes I do freelance work besides my salaried job. Last year I owed about $1,500 in taxes because of the freelance stuff. But generally, if I don't do any freelance work, I get about $1,000 back from the government when I do my taxes. Does that mean I wouldn't get ANY of the $7,500 credit since the government typically owes me a little bit?
I'm also not seeing a firm release date for the '17 Volt. Looks like the '16 model only went to select states and the '17 will be available sometime in the Spring of this year.
also, does this car loan calculator sound about right?
payment split in two, ~$213/month sounds pretty decent to me for a brand new electric vehicle that only needs gas on ~10% of trips.
Sorry. The $7500 includes withholding. Total federal tax paid I should have said.
just thinking out loud, anyone please chime in if you have experience with electric vehicles and tax credits...
2017 Chevy Volt is $33,220.
Federal tax credit is $7,500 for the Volt + $2,000 PA state tax credit. So the Volt would be $23,720. 5-year car loan and splitting this with my partner would be roughly $213/month.