I think they're a no haggle dealer.
That's kind of their shtick, actually.
I think they're a no haggle dealer.
Has anyone ever been able to successfully haggle with Carmax?
This is probably one of the best writeups I've seen:
http://www.focusrs.org/forum/9-focus-rs-discussions/20801-2016-rs-track-car-fast-but-flaws-real.html
I hadn't heard about the power issue though. Does one full power pull on the dyno, then drops power? Super weird.
FWIW, the way he talked about it on his podcast, he was just too in love with the car, and realized that he made a mistake after. Farah doesn't sugar coat it, so I don't think it's a situation where he was saving face with Ford.
This is the most in-depth look I've seen: http://www.vorshlag.com/forums/showthread.php?p=58372
Good explanation of some shortcomings of an unmodified Focus RS
I kind of see them like a GameStop for cars. Except they don't sell new cars
It's impossible.
The business model is built around no haggling for a number of reasons:
1: Employee compensation. They make a flat rate on cars and I believe extra if they sell you a warranty...
2: ...which leads us to said warranty. Publications such as Jalopnik rave about how inexpensive these warranties are. But what they don't know if that the warranties are subsidized through the price of every car they sell. Whether you buy a warranty or not, you are paying for a portion of that warranty that you either bought OR didn't buy.
If a comparable BMW 335i is $30K at a reputable private dealer, but $33K at CarMax, that's because the $3K extra is what keeps the price of the warranty so low when you look into purchasing it through them. So when they quote you a price of $1800 for an additional 5 years and 72 miles of bumper-to-bumper coverage, you're actually paying $4800 for it (if not more, since at the other dealer you can haggle). Not $1800.
3: They also low-ball the shit out of trade-ins and make huge margins when they put them up on the lot.
All of this is true but they sure are convenient and easy to deal with. Having been through the buying process about 10 times in the last 8 years (not just for me, relatives ask my help also!) Carmax has the double advantage of little to no pressure and a speedy buying process.
I've also noticed that, at least around here, car lots that undercut Carmax prices by any significant degree do so because they aren't doing any significant inspection or refurbishment of their product. They pretty much sale "as is" and it is on you if you don't notice that the car needs new tires or isn't aligned properly or has a minor oil leak (or several of them) or any number of other issues.
We have several major chains in the Atlanta area that operate by selling nice cars at well below average retail but having dealt with two of them in the last couple of years I can see where they are saving their money. If you buy from them your car is probably due an oil change, a battery and maybe a set of tires, at the very least.
I'm not saying all of Carmax's product is perfect but by and large they seem to to be selling vehicles that do not require any significant mechanical or service investment for the customer right after the initial sale. And to a lot of folks, that is a pretty big win.
This is the most in-depth look I've seen: http://www.vorshlag.com/forums/showthread.php?p=58372
Good explanation of some shortcomings of an unmodified Focus RS
When I looked at Carmax a year ago they were priced over the manufacturers certified preowned vehicles from dealers (which includes a lot more warranty than Carmax anyway). No idea why anyone buys from that place.I've also noticed that, at least around here, car lots that undercut Carmax prices by any significant degree do so because they aren't doing any significant inspection or refurbishment of their product. They pretty much sale "as is" and it is on you if you don't notice that the car needs new tires or isn't aligned properly or has a minor oil leak (or several of them) or any number of other issues.
Wont make much difference unless you're past 35-50% wear on the other, it's only really a difference of a few mm, the new tyre would wear ever so slightly faster until the radial difference equalizes a little but we're talking negligable differences here.
If you want to go with both, try knocking them down on a pair, they're usually pretty flexible on multiples so say something along the lines of "could you do both fronts for $500?" (saves you $50), if they say yes, wait until after the deals been made to tell them you want to keep the non-flat tyre theyre changing, and use that as a backup for the future, normally they will accept a deal on the unspoken assumption that they'll get to keep the one they swap out, and sell it on as part worn somewhere down the line - it being unspoken works to your advantage here.
Asking for part worn outright for just the flat is probably not an option as it's not a popular type.
I'd say 90% of dealers selling luxury cars are selling off lease vehicles with bad titles or accidents. It is an epidemic in NYC and they target lower-demographics who have poor credit and want to desperately drive an expensive looking car. Same thing in Florida. Hell, there's an entire company called "Off Lease Only" that specializes this.
Cheap dealers will never put money into a car, but OEM dealerships themselves have to if they put it on the lot. Likewise, in NY State and other places with state inspections, it's mandatory to make sure brakes and tires are above certain wear limits.
And yeah, don't get me wrong, I've considered CarMax before for buying a used unreliable car with a crazy long warranty.
PS. Like the owner of this example, I too always store my cars on the helipad of my yacht situated in the Mediterranean.
Thanks guys for the Carmax info.
I saw a 2014 EVO X close to me but it seems priced high compared to what some people are paying at the dealers for similarly priced cars.
But I think im out of the evo game.
But I think im out of the evo game.
Didn't someone post here recently about a friend of theirs building their own amazing car wash bay?
Was it this guy who just posted a full album on reddit?
http://m.imgur.com/a/2mlAa
Yesss... Join me in the Porsche world and never look back.
There's always the Cayman, you know, for the people that can't afford Ferraris.Man the only thing in my price range would be a 997 non turbo.
First leak of the McLaren 650S successor, the P14. Supposed to be a baby P1 with a host of new technologies to dominate the Ferrari 488. Who's ordering one?
Yesss... Join me in the Porsche world and never look back.
M3 daily, GT3 weekend, and Raptor for winter/hauling. Man's got good taste.
So this years C&D Lightning Lap and MTs Best Drivers Car Laguna Seca lap times have caused quite a stir across the internet.
Chevrolet shitting on everyone basically.
$70k Grand Sport one tenth down at VIR to a $300k GT3 RS.
$40k 1LE Camaro barely slower than a $150k M4 GTS at VIR and faster at Laguna Seca.
Ive said it months back in this thread, the Grand Sport is mine next year. Would have went 1LE if it wasn't the 1SS and had the A10 tranny in it.
edit:
oh forgot one thing. the new Audi R8 V10 Plus is one big slow "supercar". 2 seconds slower than a $40k 1LE Camaro.
Have to say i don't like the looks of the modern mclaren cars but i see an improvement here.First leak of the McLaren 650S successor, the P14. Supposed to be a baby P1 with a host of new technologies to dominate the Ferrari 488. Who's ordering one?
Have to say i don't like the looks of the modern mclaren cars but i see an improvement here.
Ordering one? Hell no, only NA sportscars for me. I don't care if they are faster and better, the sound will always be inferior.
Yep I'm in agreement at the moment. That's why I'm seriously considering something like an RS5 or MC Stradale and putting a custom exhaust on it as my next car.
I feel like its my duty to have a screaming V8 before they completely die out.
Yep I'm in agreement at the moment. That's why I'm seriously considering something like an RS5 or MC Stradale and putting a custom exhaust on it as my next car.
I feel like its my duty to have a screaming V8 before they completely die out.
My colleague drives an rs5 and it idles like an angry chocolate fountain.
So this years C&D Lightning Lap and MTs Best Drivers Car Laguna Seca lap times have caused quite a stir across the internet.
Chevrolet shitting on everyone basically.
$70k Grand Sport one tenth down at VIR to a $300k GT3 RS.
$40k 1LE Camaro barely slower than a $150k M4 GTS at VIR and faster at Laguna Seca.
Ive said it months back in this thread, the Grand Sport is mine next year. Would have went 1LE if it wasn't the 1SS and had the A10 tranny in it.
edit:
oh forgot one thing. the new Audi R8 V10 Plus is one big slow "supercar". 2 seconds slower than a $40k 1LE Camaro.
From a performance standpoint, GM nailed it with the current-gen Camaro SS. It's just too bad that it hasn't translated into sales for them as the Mustang is eating its lunch. I wonder how much of that is due to the styling, because every time I see one on the road, I have no idea if it's a new or old one.
From a performance standpoint, GM nailed it with the current-gen Camaro SS. It's just too bad that it hasn't translated into sales for them as the Mustang is eating its lunch. I wonder how much of that is due to the styling, because every time I see one on the road, I have no idea if it's a new or old one.
Random question, but why are BMW M6 depreciating faster than the M3 and M5? There are some from 2007-2009 that go for under 30K. Was there some time bomb in there due to some stereotypical German over engineering?
At those prices I'm tempted to trade in my 2013 328i xDrive just to have one of the V10 in my garage. (I already have a Subaru to haul the family around)
Random question, but why are BMW M6 depreciating faster than the M3 and M5? There are some from 2007-2009 that go for under 30K. Was there some time bomb in there due to some stereotypical German over engineering?
At those prices I'm tempted to trade in my 2013 328i xDrive just to have one of the V10 in my garage. (I already have a Subaru to haul the family around)
Because that V10 alone is worth $30K and if anything goes wrong with it, the car is pretty much a total loss at that point.
Random question, but why are BMW M6 depreciating faster than the M3 and M5? There are some from 2007-2009 that go for under 30K. Was there some time bomb in there due to some stereotypical German over engineering?
At those prices I'm tempted to trade in my 2013 328i xDrive just to have one of the V10 in my garage. (I already have a Subaru to haul the family around)
Because that V10 alone is worth $30K and if anything goes wrong with it, the car is pretty much a total loss at that point.
That doesn't answer his question, because the M5 is the same car and didn't depreciate as fast.
The real answer is: because it's ugly. Also, a lot of them are very poorly maintained with shaky CarFaxes. My best friend and I spent a lot of time looking for a good M6 earlier this year for him, and the majority (say 7/10) were not in optimal shape or close to it. Some have had clear resprays done on certain body parts, some ran rough. One of the M6s had a broken door card inside that just pulled open...it felt like someone was using it to stash something between the door panel and the door card. It was pretty weird, since it's not something that breaks so easily inside.
Then there were the 06-07 models which had the undesirable engine design that would prevent 2 quarts of oil from draining out during oil changes (there was no second plug), and as a result those 06-07 models had engines that would fail hardcore. 06-07 cars also had significant differential and SMG failures too. 08+ cars improved a lot on these issues, but the car has since caught an unreliable vibe which is currently scaring people off. In a few years, V10s will be so desirable that the prices of them will probably start going up.
Furthermore, 2012+ M6s are depreciating like tanks, which is pushing values of the E6x M6s down more. Current M6s can be had in the $40-50K range used, which is what I paid for my 2012 XKR in mint shape, with only 27K miles. Both cars cost nearly the same amount (about $105 when new). The BMW depreciated as significantly as the Jaguar.
If you have deep pockets to maintain these cars and are committed to a V10, I'd get one. Although, I'd probably get an M5 since it is a very handsome looking car. Depreciation will likely stop on these cars shortly, and in a few years will certainly go up as the whole industry will step away from NA vehicles. An NA V10 will be a coveted treasure.
100% true. The E63 M6 is fucking hideous. What a god awful design. It is most likely the ugliest BMW ever made IMO. It's like Chris Bangle smashed his head on concrete shortly before trying to pay homage to the original M6.
The F13 M6 is gorgeous though, a massive recovery from the Banglization of the poor E63.
The TT V8 in the current M6 is also hot garbage. All of BMWs current engines are awful.
And now that BMW has decided to go modular for all their engine designs, all of the timing is on the back of the motor.
Omg...if you have to drop the motor just to do a chain replacement, that'd be hell. The worst part about this upcoming 4.0 V8 is that rumor says Jaguar may be using it too. Which, imo, will be the beginning of the end for my love of the brand as it stands now. I don't want anything BMW designed in a British car.
The death of the Jaguar AJIII 5.0 to make way for a twin-turbo piece of shit BMW motor will forever scar me. I'll still end up loving (and possibly keeping) my own XKR and possibly a future F-Type purchase (I'm looking into getting a V6 6MT because I believe they will appreciate), but I'll likely never own another Jaguar product ever again if it's straddled with a BMW motor.
Time to start another all day detail. Here's the before.
More truth bombs. I like driving my brother's M6 when I'm in NYC, but the power behind it (while terrific) is so uninspired. Nothing at all impressive about that lump, no character, no personality, just nothing. Plus they do have reliability issues here and there.
Where as when he had his E63 M6, that thing was a hoot. Steered better, felt more planted, and made a beautiful sound (M6 had a more open exhaust than the M5). It's only downfall was the SMG transmission, but there was a way to get around by lifting your foot off the throttle when shifting.