Father and Daughter
This is a shot film by the director of The Red Turtle, Michaël Dudok de Wit, which they aired before the main screening. This short is readily available on Youtube (once you get past all the porn) so I don’t really feel like I need to say too much about this movie. If you watch this work you will get a very clear idea of the directorial style of the director and of the The Red Turtle.
De Wit does not portray anything which is superfluous. The art is simple, but evocative. All the lines are very clean and the backgrounds are plain. The direction does not draw attention to itself and there is very little movement of the camera. There is no spoken dialogue. The movie communicates its ideas purely through its visuals and has no interest in distracting you with anything else.
It's good. I don't love it, but I appreciate it's technical qualities.
The Red Turtle
I should probably get this out of the way right at the top – I didn’t really care for this film. I think it was the least interesting movie that I saw during the entire festival, including Train to Busan. I agree with Javac in so much as this is clearly well produced and directed movie but that’s about as far as I am willing to go.
This movie is remarkably simple. A man finds himself shipwrecked and stranded on a desert island and resolves to deal with his situation. That’s about all I can say without telling you every major plot point in the film because, truly, there aren’t that many of them. I found myself expecting the movie to build up to some kind of crescendo that never happened and instead what we get is more like a series of vignettes into a man’s life. I was honestly quite surprised to see that the movie captured so much of the human experience inside of this very simple premise, but it’s really due to how tight everything is. This story is as stripped down and honed as’ de Wit’s visual style and there’s truly no fat to be found anywhere.
Speaking of de Wit’s directorial style, this movie very much resembles Father and Daughter in terms of its stylistic approach. The direction rarely calls attention it itself. The camera movement is so minimal as to be effectively non-existent. We don’t get sudden cuts or close ups. Everything is held at a steady and clear distance so that the audience sees everything de Wit wants you to see. It is a very clinical and restrained piece, for the most part. We are observing the actions of the man in an almost objective fashion, rather than the camera subjectively conveying the emotions of the characters are watching it.
If you’ve read or heard anything about this movie you’ll probably know that, like de Wit’s Father and Daughter, this movie does not feature any dialogue but unlike that short film this movie is 80 minutes long. Choosing to go dialogue free for the entirety of this entire feature is a bold and confident creative choice especially for your first major film and in truth the movie does a good job of conveying most of the things you need to know.
Yet, about half way through this relatively short movie I found that I didn’t really care about anyone in the film or what was going to happen to them. I feel like there’s a few reasons why this is the case for me.
Firstly, I don’t personally buy into the main character moment that marks the middle of this film and it’s pretty important you accept what’s going on for the rest of the movie to “work” for you. It’s hard for the movie to really explain everything that it needs to ‘sell’ this to me because, of course, the movie has no dialogue. You can communicate a variety of very complicated ideas through visuals alone but I don’t feel like de Wit did enough to sell me on this one core idea because his visuals are very restrained. If I don’t buy this idea, and the relationship that flourishes from it, I can’t buy the rest of the movie.
Secondly, I don’t think the character designs allow for very expressive character emotions because of the design of the eyes and, on top of that, I don’t think the film has particularly impressive character animation either. They’re less expressive and emotive than even those restrained Miyazaki character designs. This is an even bigger problem when you have no dialogue because then you even more resting on how effectively these characters can convey emotion.
Finally, I felt like this movie was too long. I didn’t feel like anything in the movie justified its extended running time and I would argue you could convey essentially the same simple story in far, far less time. I didn’t feel like a number of the scenes in the movie served any discernible purpose. There’s only so much you can flesh out the characters and the ideas in this movie when you don’t have any dialogue and your directorial style is very restrained. It feels like this is a very simple tale about the human experience told in a beautifully simple way, but I just don’t understand why there is so much of it that is not saying anything of note.