AVATAR surpasses Titanic to become the highest-grossing movie OF ALL TIME

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gary Whitta said:
Anyone think Edge of Darkness has a shot at it this weekend? The tracking I've seen is all over the place, everything from 15 on the low end to high 20s.
Avatar is trending to $29m or so. If Darkness has a good debut it could be close.
 
GhaleonEB said:

Care to elaborate?

(The attack force getting owned was due to a combined assault from literally every living thing in the area. Before the goddess or whatever got involved, the na'vi were pretty much toast.
 
Gary Whitta said:
Anyone think Edge of Darkness has a shot at it this weekend? The tracking I've seen is all over the place, everything from 15 on the low end to high 20s.

Really hard to predict. Has America forgiven Gibson yet? :P This movie will either revive or bury his acting career, unless he casts himself on his personal projects. :P

I like Mel despite what happened, I hope EOD turns out good and does well.
 
Thagomizer said:
Care to elaborate?

(The attack force getting owned was due to a combined assault from literally every living thing in the area. Before the goddess or whatever got involved, the na'vi were pretty much toast.
Eh. It should be taken to the other, non-box office Avatar thread.

But short version: if you're really going to equate the two situations, I can't help you. All I can do is laugh.
jett said:
You should watch Avatar some time, Kagari. :P Even Phoenix Dark is going to, maybe he already has.



It'll easily reach 2 billion by the week's end.

2 billion.





2 billion. And worldwide grosses aren't slowing down at all. If it wasn't for Alice In Wonderland I really wouldn't be able to say when is the madness going to stop.
Wasn't there a story a few weeks ago about Avatar getting an extension of its 3D and IMAX run on a big chunk of theaters, even after Alice opens?
 
GhaleonEB said:
Avatar is trending to $29m or so. If Darkness has a good debut it could be close.
The closer it gets to release, the worse the tracking has been getting, and Avatar held pretty phenomenally, so chances are good for a seventh consecutive week at number one.
 
This is the dumbest discussion on Avatar in a while. Let me give it a shot!

RDA actually was already mining the Hallelujah mountains. The operation was just a little out of frame (always to the left) of every single shot of Jake and friends in the mountains. The mining technique was to chip away at the underside on giant scaffolding and stuff the Unobtainium into thousands of balloons. They then float away with these Unoballoons tied to the scaffolding Up-style and are collected in the stratosphere by RDA shuttles or plummet to the ground, whichever happens first. They didn't take part in the battle because this mining venture was too damn profitable, and they thought Quaritch was a dick, too.
 
Sharp said:
The closer it gets to release, the worse the tracking has been getting, and Avatar held pretty phenomenally, so chances are good for a seventh consecutive week at number one.
It's reviewing really well though, interest will probably go up as people see that it's getting good critical response. My guess is that it will be close but Avatar will probably squeak out yet another #1 week. It will probably get a small bump from all the coverage this week about it becoming the all-time #1 movie; the whole thing is just self-perpetuating at this point :lol
 
Gary Whitta said:
If I had to make a prediction, I think this could be one of those odd years where Best Picture and Best Director go to different movies.

I actually think Cameron deserves best director. In my opinion, the criticisms of Avatar's script are almost a boon to Cameron's directing considering how popular the movie is. And I'm not being glib; James Cameron is a brilliant visual storyteller. So much so, that the specifics of his scripts don't really matter as long as the basic story is solid because he tells it so well. Moreover, he seems to have mastered 3D cinematography even though the sub-medium is still in its infancy.

Btw, talking about ticket sales does not make you an Avatar hater. I liked the movie a lot and I want to see it a second time before it leaves theaters, but tickets sold is relevant from a business perspective. No one's trying to 'dethrone' Avatar by saying that other movies had larger theater audiences, that's just a fact that's worth considering when discussing the film industry. People can be impressed by Avatar's amazing financial success while still taking into consideration the actual customer base for Hollywood films. There's no reason why we can't discuss both.
 
GhaleonEB said:
Eh. It should be taken to the other, non-box office Avatar thread.

But short version: if you're really going to equate the two situations, I can't help you. All I can do is laugh.

Wasn't there a story a few weeks ago about Avatar getting an extension of its 3D and IMAX run on a big chunk of theaters, even after Alice opens?
I haven't seen any confirmation on it yet, but ya reports came out that theaters resigned avatars contract by 10 weeks for 3d screens. Now that's not all 3d screens, but alice will probably get 300-400 screens less than it would have so theaters can keep avatar going as it'll be more profit for them at that point (theaters get more per ticket the longer a film runs).

I assume when the dragon film hits it will mainly take screens from Alice, but we shall see. Regarding IMAX i heard they also resigned their contract and will show both films (probably avatar at night).
 
Somnia said:
I haven't seen any confirmation on it yet, but ya reports came out that theaters resigned avatars contract by 10 weeks for 3d screens. Now that's not all 3d screens, but alice will probably get 300-400 screens less than it would have so theaters can keep avatar going as it'll be more profit for them at that point (theaters get more per ticket the longer a film runs).

I assume when the dragon film hits it will mainly take screens from Alice, but we shall see. Regarding IMAX i heard they also resigned their contract and will show both films (probably avatar at night).
Clash of the Titans is most likely going to be 3D and is apparently going to come out on April 2nd

Thats a lot of movies to spread accross the limited number of 3D screens
 
Dead said:
Clash of the Titans is most likely going to be 3D and is apparently going to come out on April 2nd

Thats a lot of movies to spread accross the limited number of 3D screens
Ya clash will change what happens I'm sure. Theaters need to get more screens set up for 3d and fast!
 
kame-sennin said:
I actually think Cameron deserves best director.
Yeah, I'm saying he gets best director but best picture goes to Hurt Locker or Up In The Air. That's my guess anyway. What the fuck do I know?
 
Kunan said:
sigh. Haters gotta hate I guess, even with bullshit.
!

yea im a hater. Thats why I think Terminator 1-2, True Lies, and Aliens are some of the greatest films of all time. Thats why I saw Avatar in theathers opening day. Look Avatar is an OK film but it is definetly not up to par with Cameron's earlier work, the script is extremly predictable, and their really isn't anything new in the concept or imagery that we haven't seen a thousand times in The Matrix, Final Fantasy series, Aliens, Pocahantas, Dancing with Wolves, Star Wars, Halo, etc. It didn't bring much new to the table other than pushing CGI foward and making 3D movies viable. I liked the film but it's not at the same level as Jurassic Park, Empire Strikes Back, T2, The Dark Knight, etc. You all know this but your just gonna keep saying "ZOMG it was phenomenal" for God knows what reason.
 
Somnia said:
Ya clash will change what happens I'm sure. Theaters need to get more screens set up for 3d and fast!
I can pretty much guarantee you that every available digital screen that isn't 3D ready is being upconverted as we speak, and if I had to guess I'd say theaters are taking advantage of the time offered by the weak January/February movie slate and their 2009/Avatar profits to convert more of their screens to digital as well. By the end of the year, I imagine there will be probably 50-100% more 3D-ready screens available, enough to handle the inevitable onslaught of releases next year.
Gary Whitta said:
It's reviewing really well though, interest will probably go up as people see that it's getting good critical response. My guess is that it will be close but Avatar will probably squeak out yet another #1 week. It will probably get a small bump from all the coverage this week about it becoming the all-time #1 movie; the whole thing is just self-perpetuating at this point :lol
Oh, I'm sure it will be a great movie, but unless a movie gets really bad reviews it seems like they don't affect the box office to a great extent a lot of the time, and though they might be a sign of great word of mouth that usually doesn't help the opening weekend too much. We'll see, though.
 
Looking forward to Avatar hitting $2.16b, then Cameron will be like "sup dawgs, I'm the guy that made 4 billion dollars with 2 movies"
 
It was already funny when other studios stayed away from Cameron's release date this time around. After this fucking onslaught I can't wait to see the studios shuffle out of the way once the AVATAR 2 release date is announced.
 
Scullibundo said:
It was already funny when other studios stayed away from Cameron's release date this time around. After this fucking onslaught I can't wait to see the studios shuffle out of the way once the AVATAR 2 release date is announced.
It's not coming out for at least another three years anyway, so I doubt the studios have much to worry about right now.
 
I thought this guy's response summed it up well:

Number 01 in 38 days. Avatar breaks Titanic's worldwide record.

I was sure it would never be done in my lifetime. I called in the 'Joe DiMaggio 56-game hitting streak' of box office records. But it has been done. In just 38 days, James Cameron's Avatar has surpassed the $1.843 billion that James Cameron's Titanic amassed in its 41 weeks of theatrical play. We can argue all we want about 3D prices and general ticket price inflation, but this is an incredible feat in in filmgoing era, let alone our splintered generation.

Today's audiences have far more entertainment options to keep them out of the theaters. Back in Christmas 1997 and Winter 1998, the Internet was barely in its infancy, bootlegs of any kind were a non-factor, and DVDs barely on the radar. Just as no one expects the season finale of Lost to match the numbers for the finale of MASH, today's moviegoers are far more divided and have far more entertainment options that they did even twelve years ago. I don't think anyone thought Titanic's worldwide record would be topped within a generation. No one thought it would be done so quickly, and by the same filmmaker no less. This is absolutely astonishing, all the more so for the fact that it's not anywhere close to being finished.

While the domestic numbers may be curbed by the inevitable loss of IMAX and 3D screens, the international numbers (which rely far less on 3D and IMAX theaters) have no real ceiling at this point. Avatar has grossed $1.304 billion in overseas markets alone. There are only four other movies that have ever grossed even half that in overseas receipts. Avatar has today grossed $1.859 billion in global grosses. There are only eight other films that have grossed at least $929 million worldwide, or half that number. Who knows where this movie will stop? Amazing...

I also hadn't seen the behind the scenes shot, which was pretty neat (though I'm sure Sculli has).
 
Enosh said:
would be a dissgrace if it gets anything other than best effects, maybe best director

Ugh, you need to get with the times. Comments like this just make you look so arrogant.

So why shouldn't AVATAR win best picture at the Oscars? Because it's mainstream....because it's popular? Well guess what, a good movie is a good movie even if it is mainstream and popular.

AVATAR may not have an Oscar worthy script, but guess what? It has incredible visual effects amongst other great things.....does that not count for anything to you? Look at the bigger picture.

I'm so sick of people thinking that the more serious, routine movies deserve an Oscar over big blockbusters......no matter how good they are. Your mind set on the matter is completely wrong.

By the way AVATAR is more than likely gonna take home best picture at the Oscars, it's the movie to beat at the moment. And I can't wait to see all the meltdowns if it does! It'll be so fun! :lol
 
Weaxpn said:
The screenplay is mediocre. The special effects are fantastic. The resulting film is good.
I'd say:

The screenplay is good. The special effects are fantastic. The resulting film is great.

The film was a bit derivative and some lines were cheesy, but I'm still of the mind that the story was quite good and engaging. In the end, it was probably the best cinematic experience I've ever had, though I don't think it deserves Best Picture or anything.
 
Tricky I Shadow said:
By the way AVATAR is more than likely gonna take home best picture at the Oscars, it's the movie to beat at the moment. And I can't wait to see all the meltdowns if it does! It'll be so fun! :lol
Fun? Huh. I guess we all get our rocks off in different ways.
 
Well, the 3-D was stunning anyways.

avatar-pocahontas-500x486.jpg
 
Kagari said:
The basic story in Avatar has already been done to death. Not very imaginative.
every romance ever is pretty much boy meets girl, boy screws up, boy reforms and makes it up to girl, but people still see these movies because that's just what they like.
 
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME." Why is it that not adjusting for inflation makes every new blockbuster a news story? Gone With The Wind would have made over a billion domestic if it came out now.
 
Aristotlekh said:
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME." Why is it that not adjusting for inflation makes every new blockbuster a news story? Gone With The Wind would have made over a billion domestic if it came out now.
against tv, dvd, more competition, different culture, other forms of readily available and cheap entertainment, and piracy?

then there's also the fact that if it were literally released now it'd be old as fuck looking.
 
Aristotlekh said:
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME." Why is it that not adjusting for inflation makes every new blockbuster a news story? Gone With The Wind would have made over a billion domestic if it came out now.

:lol
 
I still don't have much interest in it. I'll probably wait for the DVD and rent it. (I might even spring for the extra $2 on netflix so I can get the bluray) :p
 
Cool. I saw it for the 2nd time a few days ago so I might have been the one who pushed it over the top.

It totally deserves the top spot just for bringing so much new life to cinema. We needed something like this.
But I don't think Avatar will have as much lasting appeal and rewatchability as say, Terminator 2 or Aliens, just because there are parts of the movie where I almost have to hide my face in my hands because the dialogue is so cringeworthy.
Though I guess it will be a while before someone creates a movie that even comes close visually.
 
Aristotlekh said:
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME." Why is it that not adjusting for inflation makes every new blockbuster a news story? Gone With The Wind would have made over a billion domestic if it came out now.
Except no.

1. TDK 2 won't beat Avatar. I'M ON THE COUCH.

2. Bragging about a sequel outgrossing a stand alone film is just as stupid as disregarding inflation. Avatar 2 will become more powerful than either of us.
 
Anticitizen One said:
The highest grossing pictures of all time are Gone with the Wind and Star Wars when adjusted for inflation. Avatar is #26 on the list.
I hate people use that inflation bs for films. We live in times were bootleging and the internet plays a major role in hurting the industry, something films in the past didn't have to deal with. There's far more forms of entertainment nowadays compared to the dark ages(Gone With The Wind)So for Avatar to pull in that much money is rather amazing.
 
First of all, TDK 2? :lol

Second, all of you whiny bitches better start shutting up. So what if Avatar was the highest grossing film of all time? Is that going to change your perception of other movies? Does this automatically make Avatar superior to every movie ever made? No!

Now I'm a well known The Dark Knight fan boy, you can ask anybody here about that and they'll be like "Wrath2X, yeah that guy rides Nolan and Bale nonstop". And yet I'm not complaining about how The Dark Knight is now the third highest grossing movie domestically and the fifth internationally. Because when it comes to the movie itself that never matters.

Anyway, I'm pretty fucking glad this movie is a success. Now nobody will question Cameron and anyone who does is automatically called an idiot. I just wish he doesn't take too long to come back with another movie, I hope we get the R-rated Battle Angel soon.

And if he wanted to do another anime/manga adaption I would love to see how he does Akira.
 
Saw this in the comments section of The Guardian's article (on James Cameron beating James Cameron):

Gone with the Wind made $198,676,459 domestic (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=gonewiththewind.htm)

which equates to $1,485,028,000 adjusted for inflation http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm.

It also made $201,500,000 foreign which equates to $1,506,132,853 adjusted for inflation

So its total gross in today?s money is $2,991,160,853 total worldwide.

Would this be correct?
 
Pretty fucking impressive, if not all that surprising. I doubt it would have done nearly as well if it didn't change 3D for films (according to most people - I saw it in 2D. :()

I don't get the rage over this by some people. It's not the best film ever by any stretch, but do you really expect any film that isn't a gigantic CGI blockbuster to get these numbers?
 
Sanskrit said:
Well, the 3-D was stunning anyways.

http://wtfoodge.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/avatar-pocahontas-500x486.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
That's not even the best one...

[IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/1zqttm9.png
 
Gary Whitta said:
Yeah, I'm saying he gets best director but best picture goes to Hurt Locker or Up In The Air. That's my guess anyway. What the fuck do I know?

That's also what I've been saying for quite a while (including the wtf do i know part lol). However, now that it has won the globes, I'm not so sure. Still, if best picture doesn't go to Avatar, I hope it goes to Hurt Locker (or the Basterds, but that one would sooner win director's). I saw it... half an year ago or more, it came out so long ago in Europe... and I felt that it was great though it had ... something... missing. Still better than Up in the Air, though.
 
Aristotlekh said:
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME."

:lol

If you think either of these are going to beat Avatar (or that the latter is even going to happen), you are in for a disappointment.

Count Dookkake said:
TDK fans can comfort themselves with this fact: TDK is the biggest movie ever based on a pre-existing children's property.

Watch out, we dont need irfan busting out the grand total of records TDK has.

SpeedingUptoStop said:
I still don't really understand how it happened or what the universal appeal is, but whatever.

You like Caesar. I think its safe to say the problem is in your hands, my man.
 
Trickster said:
Looking forward to Avatar hitting $2.16b, then Cameron will be like "sup dawgs, I'm the guy that made 4 billion dollars with 2 movies"
"Yo Fox, I heard you like money, so I put money in yo money so you can be rich while being rich."
 
ShinobiFist said:
I hate people use that inflation bs for films. We live in times were bootleging and the internet plays a major role in hurting the industry, something films in the past didn't have to deal with. There's far more forms of entertainment nowadays compared to the dark ages(Gone With The Wind)So for Avatar to pull in that much money is rather amazing.

True, but these different circumstances make comparing the two even less meaningful, rather than forming any sort of defense of not correcting for inflation. All you can say is that a film released in this day and age hitting the top-30 (and almost certainly top-20) of all time when adjusting for inflation, and having to compete with films that come out at a time when people had far fewer entertainment options, is an incredible feat.

Avatar-fans are too defensive about this. Of course it's an incredible achievement. No-one is able to deny this (and few were able to predict it). Heck, I actually prefer it to Gone With The Wind (which may be one of the most overrated films ever made), although obviously there are countless films I like more, several of which made less in their entire domestic runs than Avatar did last weekend. It's just a fun horse race to watch. Let's not attribute too much meaning to it.

The simple truth is that, when adjusting for inflation, Avatar is not quite the most succesful film of all time (yet). It'll be interesting to see where it ends up, though. As it is, it's still #1 and will be in theaters for quite some time.

Tim the Wiz said:
Saw this in the comments section of The Guardian's article (on James Cameron beating James Cameron):

Gone with the Wind made $198,676,459 domestic (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/...iththewind.htm)

which equates to $1,485,028,000 adjusted for inflation http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm.

It also made $201,500,000 foreign which equates to $1,506,132,853 adjusted for inflation

So its total gross in today?s money is $2,991,160,853 total worldwide.

Would this be correct?

If it is, then in terms of worldwide grosses, Gone With The Wind didn't do that much better than Titanic, when adjusting for inflation. Titanic doubled its domestic take worldwide. Just a quick estimation: I think Titanic would be at around 2.8 bln in today's dollars.
 
Tim the Wiz said:
Saw this in the comments section of The Guardian's article (on James Cameron beating James Cameron):



Would this be correct?
No... adjusting international tickets for inflation is very difficult for a lot of reasons (different exchange rates, different ticket prices, local currency issues, the need to adjust for rereleases) and BOM doesn't track the international BO well enough to be able to take that into account; in fact, when GWTW came out, pretty much nobody did. A lot of countries at the time didn't even track admissions or sales directly at all--their numbers on BOM are generally extrapolated from rental information and so on. For all intents and purposes, therefore, it's kind of useless to try to "adjust" for a movie like GWTW worldwide, but from everything I've heard Titanic is probably past it in terms of admissions, and Avatar has a good chance of doing the same.
 
I didn't think it would ever happen TBH, especially this movie... and having seen it... yeah I'm even more puzzled. I'm not sure which movie I'd prefer at the top though between the two. Maybe I'll flip a coin for it.
 
Aristotlekh said:
Can't wait 'til Dark Knight 2 and the new Star Wars movie Lucas swears won't happen overtake Avatar to become the "highest grossing movies OF ALL TIME." Why is it that not adjusting for inflation makes every new blockbuster a news story? Gone With The Wind would have made over a billion domestic if it came out now.

avatar-jake-riding.jpg


They see me rollin'...they hatin'...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom