Is this old? Leaked clip from Marvel event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w75cwgEjnQ4 Spoilers. Looks like this sets up the civil war story line.
Is this old? Leaked clip from Marvel event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w75cwgEjnQ4 Spoilers. Looks like this sets up the civil war story line.
I never understood the "shot for TV" criticisms? Like, can someone educate me? Offer comparison shots or something? Because the original Avengers always looked just fine to me - trailers as well. I actually quite liked the cinematography - many of the SHIELD scenes in particular.
Maybe it's because I don't watch TV, really. What are fundamental differences between TV cinematography and television cinematography, outside special effects tending to look much better in the former due to enhanced budgets?
I mean, Serenity was a beautifully shot movie IMO, and I've heard that criticism there, too. I just don't get it.
They did undermine that by making Cap noticeably superior to Bucky, so at no point you're thinking Cap was in any danger.I hope Age of Ultron has a sense of danger in it, thats one thing I felt the marvel movies really missed out on. The movies are fun but the villains are usually generic and don't really feel threatening, and at no point do the heroes really seem like they're in serious danger. I think winter soldier fixed this by having hard hitting action sequences. You could really feel the punches.
lol. Now I'm totally pulling this out of my ass but for some reason I keep thinking that there was an acknowledgment that to wield Thor's hammer you have to both be willing to defend the innocent and destroy evil, truly destroy it, as in maybe having to take a life to do it.
I was thinking that Cap isn't committed enough to destroying evil. Maybe he's always willing to fight but he would prefer not to have to. Maybe he would need to be willing to take the hammer and slay evil with it's power?
Except tv shows these days feature some of the best direction and lighting around so that complaint as a phrase doesn't hole upIt's just shot like a TV show would be shot: very utilitarian. Angles serve their purpose to frame the shot and nothing more, nothing to give off any sort of tone or emotion. Also the lighting makes it look very.... cheap, in retrospect. Especially the indoor shots. It looks like a set, when it's not supposed to.
Nice, although there is a discerning lack of strings...My Ultron jack-o-lantern ready for tomorrow night. I expect it to become self aware and wipe out all trick or treaters before the night ends.
Nice, although there is a discerning lack of strings...
Is this old? Leaked clip from Marvel event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w75cwgEjnQ4 Spoilers. Looks like this sets up the civil war story line.
I hope Age of Ultron has a sense of danger in it, thats one thing I felt the marvel movies really missed out on. The movies are fun but the villains are usually generic and don't really feel threatening, and at no point do the heroes really seem like they're in serious danger. I think winter soldier fixed this by having hard hitting action sequences. You could really feel the punches.
Downey seems to mumbled alot of his lines.
What does he says in the beginning?
Already kind of mentioned but the whole Cap and the Hammer thing and why can't he lift it already is tied up in a BUNCH of stuff to do with Asgard and shit.
Worthy means very different things to a super soldier from WW2 compared to a Viking God. Part of the whole deal is that you are a worthy warrior - meaning fearless, driven, focused and willing to kill.
Fucking Thanos is going to wreck house. Thanos is going to straight up kill some people. And folks... when someone kills Caps friends? gtfo the way.
What I get hung up on is why Cap would be 'become' worthy at some point. It feels like he should already be able to move it in that scene. Exactly what would happen to officially make him worthy. Cap's about the most honest and true person in the MCU so maybe it some kind of recognition of how the power should be used?
It's just shot like a TV show would be shot: very utilitarian. Angles serve their purpose to frame the shot and nothing more, nothing to give off any sort of tone or emotion. Also the lighting makes it look very.... cheap, in retrospect. Especially the indoor shots. It looks like a set, when it's not supposed to.
Yeah, been posted...but always a great scene to see....
I think you can see it better in this (which is the entire conference):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2VoJuVfbjI
Maybe it's because he's trying to move it with strength and not with purpose or whatever.What I get hung up on is why Cap would be 'become' worthy at some point. It feels like he should already be able to move it in that scene. Exactly what would happen to officially make him worthy. Cap's about the most honest and true person in the MCU so maybe it some kind of recognition of how the power should be used?
Maybe it's because he's trying to move it with strength and not with purpose or whatever.
Cap wielding Mjollnir was foreshadowed back in The First Avenger. The Red Skull is said to believe that "the Gods are waiting for a superior man" and that's why he demands the Super-Soldier Serum in the first place; the implication is that Cap is that superior man. He's the one who will literally be able to wield the power of the Gods.
Sounds like "Thor didnt say where he was going for answers?"
Maybe it's because he's trying to move it with strength and not with purpose or whatever.
Cap wielding Mjollnir was foreshadowed back in The First Avenger. The Red Skull is said to believe that "the Gods are waiting for a superior man" and that's why he demands the Super-Soldier Serum in the first place; the implication is that Cap is that superior man. He's the one who will literally be able to wield the power of the Gods.
So much conversation on what is going to amount to Cap picking up the hammer and whacking Ultron. It will be a great scene, but about 20 seconds long.
And yeah, if they're loading Chekov's gun this early in Age of Ultron, I'm sure it will be Ultron and not Thanos who gets whacked.
Tony: Thor didn't say where he was going for answers?Downey seems to mumbled alot of his lines.
What does he says in the beginning?
I assume Thor is looking answer about how Loki scepter can give human, powers?
I hope they save that for Thanos, not Ultron. Ultron is a man-made thing .. and only seems to be a priority threat to Earth. Thanos is cosmic and threatens every living being ..
"I broke that mortal's coffee mug" is fucking amazing.
I think it's got more to do with what happened with the Maximoffs. This scene apparently takes place after The Avengers encountered Wanda, and she put visions in their heads. I'm assuming this is what caused Hulk to freak out, and the "something stupid" Steve says Tony did probably refers to the Hulkbuster fight. Whatever Cap saw didn't seem to affect him or he's doing a good job of hiding it from Tony, and whatever Thor saw apparently caused him to leave to "find answers."
Or maybe yeah, they found out the source of the twins' powers and Thor goes back to Asgard to ask Odin (Loki) about it. That would certainly be interesting if it alerts Loki to the location of the staff/infinity stone.
Watching this was really interesting.
It's always strange how things are reported and then watching the event itself.
Things I picked up on we're not the same things mentioned by those covering the event live.
Also, I thought this was a professional press event. It seemed borderline rude to me when they were shouting over the actors at the end. I understand enthusiasm but sheesh.
I was thinking the vision they show him is of Ragnarok.
I always wondered. Is Wanda the real name of Scarlett Witch?
It's just shot like a TV show would be shot: very utilitarian. Angles serve their purpose to frame the shot and nothing more, nothing to give off any sort of tone or emotion. Also the lighting makes it look very.... cheap, in retrospect. Especially the indoor shots. It looks like a set, when it's not supposed to.
I don't think cheap is the right word. Avengers is a bright, vibrant, high contrast film, very much like a cartoon. It cast an extremely wide net for its first entry in order to attract as many people as possible. IMO, the look of the movie is very deliberate, albeit slightly boring. They had to take characters from movies with very different aesthetic settings and put them all together. Their solution was something a bit drab but functional.
With the second film, I think they're more comfortable giving the Avengers franchise its own visual identity. They've already got audiences hooked so they can take bigger risks.
I don't think cheap is the right word. Avengers is a bright, vibrant, high contrast film, very much like a cartoon. It cast an extremely wide net for its first entry in order to attract as many people as possible. IMO, the look of the movie is very deliberate, albeit slightly boring. They had to take characters from movies with very different aesthetic settings and put them all together. Their solution was something a bit drab but functional.
With the second film, I think they're more comfortable giving the Avengers franchise its own visual identity. They've already got audiences hooked so they can take bigger risks.
My Ultron jack-o-lantern ready for tomorrow night. I expect it to become self aware and wipe out all trick or treaters before the night ends.
I don't think cheap is the right word. Avengers is a bright, vibrant, high contrast film, very much like a cartoon. It cast an extremely wide net for its first entry in order to attract as many people as possible. IMO, the look of the movie is very deliberate, albeit slightly boring. They had to take characters from movies with very different aesthetic settings and put them all together. Their solution was something a bit drab but functional.
With the second film, I think they're more comfortable giving the Avengers franchise its own visual identity. They've already got audiences hooked so they can take bigger risks.
Exactly. People don't seem to realize that the Avengers was an experimental endeavour and that the films had to play it a lot safer up to that point in execution and tone.
I didn't say it made it better, just that it was understandably made a certain wayDoesn't make it better. It will age terribly.
I didn't say it made it better, just that it was understandably made a certain way
Is there tangible evidence that Pepper will be in the movie? I'll be disappointed if she doesn't show up.
Doesn't seem like she is. I think Rhodey and maybe Selvig are the only side characters confirmed to be in it, in whatever minor role.
I know I've definitely posted the Banner and Natasha scene before. Lighting is gorgeousWell, The Avengers did have a few good shots. I know they were posted on GAF, but I can't remember which thread.
Edit: Found them