John Bender
Banned
Captain America moving "Mjolnir" was awesome!
Cap is the best
Cap is the best
As the director, Whedon has direct control over how the movie is shot.
However, as the director, he also doesn't have the time to dictate every scene, shot for shot. What he really needs is a better cinematographer. AoU has a new guy, Ben Davis, who also was the director of photography for Guardians of the Galaxy, Kick-Ass, Stardust, and Layer Cake. I like his body of work more than Seamus McGarvey who did the first Avengers movie.
Captain America moving "Mjolnir" was awesome!
Cap is the best
Since its seems that Robert Downey Jr. has gotten a new contract I wouldnt be surprised when most of the current cast would have gotten a new contract.
It will look better. I'm 100% sure.
Heck, I was watching the AoU trailer the other day and one of the related videos was the first Avengers trailer. I actually never saw that trailer before, so I clicked it and wow, that was such a shit trailer. Like, really fucking terrible.
We've come a long way since then.
Yep.
Although it seems to have a better take of the "genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist" line than what the movie got. It's weird when trailers do that.
But I think overall it's pretty terrible. I love NIN too, The Fragile in particular, but I don't think it fits the trailer at all. But, like I said, I didn't see it before the movie so I don't have that context either. Maybe it was hype back then.
So in MCU canon, whoever picks up the hammer gains all the powers of Thor. In the first Thor film, we saw that without his powers, Thor is essentially a base-level human in peak condition. Does this imply that if Steve were to pick up the hammer, he would get Thor's entire powerset (super strength, durability, etc)?
So in MCU canon, whoever picks up the hammer gains all the powers of Thor. In the first Thor film, we saw that without his powers, Thor is essentially a base-level human in peak condition. Does this imply that if Steve were to pick up the hammer, he would get Thor's entire powerset (super strength, durability, etc)?
So in MCU canon, whoever picks up the hammer gains all the powers of Thor. In the first Thor film, we saw that without his powers, Thor is essentially a base-level human in peak condition. Does this imply that if Steve were to pick up the hammer, he would get Thor's entire powerset (super strength, durability, etc)?
Is it really the "power of Thor" if Thor loses his power unless he has the hammer... was Thor just named after the inscription?
Why is Thor more worthy of Milnor than Captain America at the moment?
Doesn't seem to make sense why he'd be able to handle it, while Captain can only slightly lift it. Unless captain was pretending.
I'm pretty sure he would be about caps level without his hammer. I seem to remember a random asguardian being on shield who had lived for about 1000 years and was super solider strong.
My plot theory
I thought due to leaks that have been confirmed, we know thatScarlett Witch causes banner to hulk out in Africa, where the Hulk Buster fight is.
Is it really the "power of Thor" if Thor loses his power unless he has the hammer... was Thor just named after the inscription?
Blake was created by Odin for Thor, Thor eventually gave up the Blake thing himself.It doesn't really make sense in a world where Thor is merely an alien and Odin is a dick. It's a paradox to the days before Thor was actually Thor. Donald Blake was merely a human who found Thors hammer and gained his powers by being worthy. They later retconned this origin into Thor being the actual god of thunder.
Captain America moving "Mjolnir" was awesome!
Cap is the best
More likeTony "surprises" the rest of the Avengers at the beginning of the film with his army of suicide drones, his master plan to not put people he cares about in any more danger.
Ultron (possibly the hub/general drone) will gain conscience in his broken body during the party, lay a verbal smackdown on the Avengers and escape.
The avengers will become divided during the film, some supporting Tony's drone program and some blaming him for all the death and destruction Ultron is causing, resulting in a Tony vs Banner argument that leads to hulk buster etc.
Ultron will capture Scarlet and QS but helps them overcome there brainwashing, generally because he has a thing about strings and not being controlled - instead of the established comics daddy issues theme.
Scarlett will defeat Ultron using her untapped power (yawn) almost killing the already defeated Avengers. It might also hit Dr Stanges radar, they have plenty of time to film a after credit cameo so you never know.
Oh and at some point Jarvis will get stuck in a body by Ultron (wants Jarvis to be free of strings) que awesome capes and creepy scenes with Scarlet.
The end.
Captain America moving "Mjolnir" was awesome!
Cap is the best
I never understood the "shot for TV" criticisms? Like, can someone educate me? Offer comparison shots or something? Because the original Avengers always looked just fine to me - trailers as well. I actually quite liked the cinematography - many of the SHIELD scenes in particular.
Maybe it's because I don't watch TV, really. What are fundamental differences between TV cinematography and television cinematography, outside special effects tending to look much better in the former due to enhanced budgets?
I mean, Serenity was a beautifully shot movie IMO, and I've heard that criticism there, too. I just don't get it.
Looks like Claudia Kim who has some unknown role in the film.
Yes. I know all that. Most of it is a retcon. Blake wasn't a creation of Odin or part of Thor or anything like that. Odin did strip Thor of his power and locked it into his hammer. The hammer is sent to Earth in disguise as a walking stick. Donald wanders by finds the hammer and transforms into Thor. Thus fulfilling the original inscription. Only later is it "revealed" that Donald was never real but introducing a weird paradox with the inscription.Blake was created by Odin for Thor, Thor eventually gave up the Blake thing himself.
Somewhere in between though (Ragnarok?) Blake was a separate guy, not sure what happened.
EDIT: holy shit, I can get Odin wanting to give Thor a human form to teach him humilty, but... world-class Surgeon??
I think the 1.85:1 aspect ratio had some part in the criticisms.
Who Could she be...any ideas people?
Could she be Shield ??
Why is Thor more worthy of Milnor than Captain America at the moment?
Doesn't seem to make sense why he'd be able to handle it, while Captain can only slightly lift it. Unless captain was pretending.
One thing, however..
Banner helps create Ultron with Tony from what I remember. Also, Ruffalo recently referred to Ultron as his baby.
One thing, however..
Banner helps create Ultron with Tony from what I remember. Also, Ruffalo recently referred to Ultron as his baby.
What I get hung up on is why Cap would be 'become' worthy at some point. It feels like he should already be able to move it in that scene. Exactly what would happen to officially make him worthy. Cap's about the most honest and true person in the MCU so maybe it some kind of recognition of how the power should be used?
Self doubt because Bucky? And he is kind of an asshole for not inviting Falcon to that Avengers party.
Is this old? Leaked clip from Marvel event https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w75cwgEjnQ4 Spoilers. Looks like this sets up the civil war story line.