Escape Goat
Member
Black Widow is not chunky. Shes just big boned.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Avengers: Age of Ultron | Production Thread
- Thread starter George Oscar Bluth II
- Start date
- Status
shira
Member
Escape Goat
Member
I expect one Avenger to die in this film. Joss likes to take peoples favorite character and kill them. But I doubt Marvel would let him do that so we may have to settle for having a character quit. That will open the door for more screen time next time around. Also, they could appear in supporting roles like Black Widow and Falcon in Winter Soldier.
"Tony Stark has harnessed the power of the stars in the Galaxy to create a collection of mobile devices"
Is this the same marketing firm that did the awkward Apple-bashing ads?
crimsonspider89
Banned
First full trailer coming with Macfarland,USA 2/20
because shit man, you gotta spend some of them billions, what's the pleasure of being Tony Stark then
BronsonLee
Member
Not gonna lie, I'm surprised at this. McFarland feels like the Saving Mr. Banks/Miracle type of Disney movie where it's lower budget and not a really big deal to them. Putting Avengers trailer with it is interesting.
Bobby Roberts
Banned
First full trailer coming with Macfarland,USA 2/20
Where'd you get that? And who's reporting this?
Bobby Roberts
Banned
Took that over to the batman v Superman thread, a poster there notes this image comes from a site called "The Projection List" and the owners of the site have basically stated they're just guessing as to the dates, they don't really know and haven't been told by the studios when/where these trailers are coming.
crimsonspider89
Banned
Meh. It had processing so figured was either an expected date or guess. Also reversed image search and nothing came up.
PhoncipleBone
Banned
But what better way to raise opening weekend numbers than attach the first trailer for BvS to it?
So, we meet again 240p.
jackissocool
Member
The MCU is so huge. He was given his award by an actress who plays a character in the same universe that his character has never met.
This was posted a few months ago, but certain characters were obscured.
This doesn't seem right for the MCU - Captain America is definitely shorter than both Thor and Loki.
Take away the suit and Tony becomes the shortest member
This was posted a few months ago, but certain characters were obscured.
6'5? In RDJ's dreams.
#1 defender
Member
The Iron Man suit comes with lifts.
Suit =/= Tony Stark
Broken Joystick
At least you can talk. Who are you?
Steve Rogers: Big man in a suit of armour. Take that off, what are you?
Tony Stark: Genius, billionaire, playboy, tiny.
lol maybe he reaches 6'5 while hovering! Those lifts would have to be bigger than this for that picture to be accurate for RDJ.
Escape Goat
Member
"I am Iron Man."
Chris Evans isn't 6'4, either.
Escape Goat
Member
Chris Elvans is though.
I think they tried to make Iron Man a little taller than Captain America when he's wearing the suit:
Though yeah, the actual actors definitely aren't those heights. More accurate:
"shippers'
people ship mcu. why
I watched the Marvel phase 3 announcement again this morning and it really got me wondering again how big Thor: Ragnarok is going to be. Especially with Feige emphasizing the title so much.
Spoilers regarding characters appearing in AoU:
I just wonder what the implications can be for Thor: Ragnarok to be considered one of the if not the most important phase 3 film, especially with Civil War coming out a year before Ragnarok and that seems like having a much bigger impact on the MCU. I get that the possible destruction of Asgard is of course a big deal, it still is very much an event that mostly impacts the Thor franchise as opposed to the dismantling of SHIELD which was a pretty big deal for the entire MCU.
But anyways I am glad we are finally getting a Thor film worthy of the name.
Spoilers regarding characters appearing in AoU:
With Idris confirming he's in AoU and Loki as well and Feige saying Ragnarok is right after AoU I really wonder when Thor is going to leave the team
I just wonder what the implications can be for Thor: Ragnarok to be considered one of the if not the most important phase 3 film, especially with Civil War coming out a year before Ragnarok and that seems like having a much bigger impact on the MCU. I get that the possible destruction of Asgard is of course a big deal, it still is very much an event that mostly impacts the Thor franchise as opposed to the dismantling of SHIELD which was a pretty big deal for the entire MCU.
But anyways I am glad we are finally getting a Thor film worthy of the name.
that's one thing that baffles me. why couldn't they just get Bettany to play Jarvis in AC as well?
George Oscar Bluth II
Banned
I'm betting that Bettany plays the Human Torch android in the AoU flashback.
I don't know much about marvel comics, but the fact that Paul Bettany is being used as Vision and was originally Jarvis - and that Stark made Ultron - isn't it implied that vision is a rogue/corrupted version of Jarvis created by Ultron?
Again, I don't know jack shit. I'm just assuming based on the casting choices.
Again, I don't know jack shit. I'm just assuming based on the casting choices.
Thatonemoor
Member
In the comics Ultron was the one to create vision but some of the info released earlier stats that vision was created by Stark and Banner.
Broken Joystick
At least you can talk. Who are you?
Believe
Thor 4/GotG 2 we can hope!
Escape Goat
Member
Sif and The Warriors 3 are groupies at best.
- Status