• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Axios (Stephen Totilo) Lawyers: Email proves Microsoft’s ABK bid is designed to elimination (Update: MS claims it was a "thought experiment")

RoboFu

One of the green rats
Anyone else keep reading the title as.......

15809914-1587572903.png
 

Ozriel

M$FT
You know, some of us don't even own any Sony console. Some of us just want the video game market to stay something competitive unlike, for example the PC operating system market? This e-mail is just a proof they want to do the same with the video game market. So yeah stay in your baby shilling warfare, most of us here aren't about this shit.

You’ve seen the unredacted email?
 

NickFire

Member
Sweet, so please share the unredacted copy of the email that you might have since you're making such definitive claims.

Upload it on google drive to others can see as well.
Stop it. I dismiss your claim it’s not related because of the date. I don’t profess to have certainty that it is related. I do say common sense suggests a 70 trillion dollar deal doesn’t happen overnight though.

So back to the question you keep dodging. Why is MS listing 2017 articles as exhibits if a 2019 email can’t possibly be related?
 
Sony never started the "cross play initiative". There was a kotaku article where they discovered cross play between 360 and PS3 was possible and they asked MS about it. MS said they wouldn't be doing that. Sony was never involved.

https://www.eurogamer.net/final-fantasy-14-boss-lobbying-microsoft-for-cross-platform-play

https://www.eurogamer.net/final-fan...to-microsoft-not-allowing-cross-platform-play

Bullshit. Sony started a cross play initiative when they started making games that worked on PS3 and Vita or PC. Sony approached Microsoft and they said no. They felt they were market leaders with XBOX 360 and they were pulling shady shit they didn't like used against them such as timed exclusives, especially DLC on major releases.

Microsoft later changed their response and stated that gamers would be required to have a Microsoft account to do it and Sony, quite rightly didn't agree to turn their console into an advertising tool for their competitors. PC cross play did not require a PSN account.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
Where did I call the unredacted email that none of us have read as either fake or true ?

Right here...

You mean like the 'gamers lawsuit' lawyers fake claims about this being 'the plan around buying activision' that isn't even related to the on-going activision acquisition ?

Because you believe Microsoft automatically.
 
Last edited:

MarkMe2525

Banned
Wait... I have to be missing something. All I see is a black box. Please tell me we aren't 13 pages in and we don't know what the email says.

Edit: my god my fears are confirmed. This is getting out of hand. Like seriously, what has this place become? There is literally nothing to discuss. Embarrassing
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Stop it. I dismiss your claim it’s not related because of the date. I don’t profess to have certainty that it is related. I do say common sense suggests a 70 trillion dollar deal doesn’t happen overnight though.

So back to the question you keep dodging. Why is MS listing 2017 articles as exhibits if a 2019 email can’t possibly be related?


You are right, it doesn't.

But in this case what shuts your argument down is that in this case we know for a fact that Acti MS talks began in Nov 2021, less than 2 months before the deal was officially announced.




AIZD9wX.png







Right here...



Because you believe Microsoft automatically.


That's me calling the claim of it being about the ACTI buyout fake, see above for dates.

None of us know the content or context of the emails where Booty supposedly said that.
 
Last edited:

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
I bet. I hear Tweak Town is a shell of itself compared to 5 years ago even. Honk Honk.
They are, they even engage in woke politics at times too. Honk honk.

Just... now hear me out... cover tech. But then again, Tweak Town has a history from other more serious tech sites as being hacks from time to time. I liked them in the distant past, but they had a lot of biases and nonsense over their tenure that would get them raked over the coals by other more serious sites and forums that just wanted data without personal biases and opinion. It's fucking tech, 1's and 0's and silicon. Let the tech do the talking, make a blog if you want to get up in your fee fee's.
 
Last edited:

Sethbacca

Member
Well interviews or whatever you want to call them...

Well in Sony's case, If MS use they're infinite money to buy every major publishers, they can't compete since third parties are a major part of Sony's success. Nintendo is another case since they are doing their own thing since the N64. The switch brought them back some third parties but it's still not what sell switches. Now the thing with Nintendo is that they're smaller than the other 2. And as we've seen recently with Saudi Arabia having something like 10% of them, they could easily be bought by MS one day if they really wanted it.
Nintendo's damage was self inflicted in the N64 & Gamecube era. 3rd parties ran away because of the cartridges and then the mini dvds since it was cheaper to make games elsewhere. To some extent Sony seems to be taking the lesson from Nintendo and focusing on quality software, but MS never got that memo since it apparently doesn't sell systems or something?
 

cireza

Member
You're dellusional if you really think after Bethesda and (maybe) Activision, they'll just stop and compete nicely.
You are delusional if you think they can buy every publisher on planet Earth without anyone preventing this.
 

Dane

Member
Nothing like Sony's entry into the gaming market. Nothing at all.

Sony's vision and technology completely changed the market and made game development a more feasible business. They also got rid of a lot of anticompetitive business practices that Nintendo and SEGA imposed on developers.
Changing what? Sega was the one who did a much more open platform in contrast with Nintendo, it was Sega of Japan that was jealous, even the "block 2D games" issue from Bernie Stolar was still kept at SIE for many years, they just let pass the higher end ones.

Sony had much more money than Sega and Nintendo combined, at the time Microsoft was around 3-5x times more valuable than them, Sony owned the CD patents and factories, they had a verticailization, technology and money advantage to sell the PS1 at 299 in the west, they could spent 9 figures just for marketing and god knows how much in exclusives.
 

NickFire

Member
You are right, it doesn't.

But in this case what shuts your argument down is that in this case we know for a fact that Acti MS talks began in Nov 2021, less than 2 months before the deal was officially announced.




AIZD9wX.png




Um, that is when a conversation happened. Does it state MS never internally discussed approaching Activision before that conversation? Does it state MS and Activision never spoke about possible opportunities beforehand?

I bet it does not.

Also - still dodging. Why is 2017 relevant when you told us 2019 wasn’t mere hours ago?
 
Last edited:

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Emperor Jimbo, adorned in his traditional samurai armor, stood at the center of the grand hall in his magnificent palace. His loyal samurais, the most skilled warriors in the realm, gathered around him, their faces filled with anticipation and determination. They had received a grave message that Microsoft, a powerful rival empire, planned to annihilate the beloved PlayStation, a symbol of gaming excellence.

As the samurais stood in silent reverence, Emperor Jimbo addressed them with a voice that resonated with authority and resolve. "My honorable warriors, the winds of war blow upon us. The time has come for us to rise and defend what we hold dear—the legacy of PlayStation. Microsoft's ambitions threaten to cast a shadow over the realm of gaming, but we shall not yield. Together, we will protect the honor of our gaming empire."

The samurais, their spirits ignited by their emperor's words, raised their swords and shouted in unison, "For PlayStation!"

Emperor Jimbo nodded, acknowledging their unwavering loyalty. "We shall plan our strategy to counter the impending threat," he declared. "But first, let us remember our roots and honor the spirit of our ancestors."

The grand hall was transformed into a gallery of memories, showcasing the rich history of PlayStation. Portraits of legendary heroes adorned the walls, while ancient artifacts, consoles, and controllers were displayed on pedestals. The samurais marveled at the artifacts, reliving moments of triumph and exhilaration.

As night fell, Emperor Jimbo led his samurais to a tranquil garden illuminated by paper lanterns. They sat beneath the cherry blossom trees, the soft petals dancing in the breeze. The atmosphere was serene, yet tinged with anticipation.

Emperor Jimbo spoke with wisdom and determination. "My loyal samurais, we must forge alliances to strengthen our cause. Let us call upon the kingdoms of Nintendo and CMA, for together we possess the power to repel this encroaching darkness."

A messenger stepped forward, bearing scrolls of invitation addressed to the leaders of Nintendo and CMA. The samurais eagerly awaited their arrival, ready to discuss a united front against Microsoft's plans.

Days turned into nights as Emperor Jimbo and his samurais deliberated, forming a strategy to confront the impending threat. They studied maps, analyzed the enemy's tactics, and trained rigorously, their bodies and minds sharpened for the battles to come.

The fateful day arrived when the leaders of Nintendo and CMA, accompanied by their own loyal warriors, journeyed to Emperor Jimbo's palace. As they met in the grand hall, the atmosphere crackled with the electricity of unity and shared purpose.

Emperor Jimbo stood before his esteemed guests, his voice filled with conviction. "Today, we unite as warriors of gaming, bound by a common cause. Together, we shall unleash the full force of our gaming legacies upon our adversaries."

With heads held high, the leaders and their samurais pledged their allegiance to Emperor Jimbo and PlayStation. They exchanged knowledge, shared battle plans, and harnessed the collective strength of their respective empires.

In the ensuing days, the samurais trained tirelessly, their skills honed to perfection. They harnessed the power of collaboration, blending the distinct strengths of each gaming empire into a formidable force. Embracing their heritage and the spirit of their ancestors, they prepared to face the imminent clash.

When the armies of Microsoft descended upon the realm, they were met with a resolute resistance. The samurais, united under Emperor Jimbo's command, fought with unwavering determination. Their swords clashed, their controllers maneuvered with precision, and their battle cries echoed through the land.

Emperor Jimbo led from the front lines, his sword gleaming in the sunlight as he struck down opponents with calculated fury. The combined forces of PlayStation, Nintendo, and CMA proved to be an unstoppable alliance, pushing back Microsoft's onslaught and defending the realm of gaming.

In the end, victory belonged to the united empires of PlayStation, Nintendo, and CMA. The forces of Microsoft, overwhelmed by the sheer strength and resilience of their adversaries, retreated, their plans of annihilation foiled.

Emperor Jimbo, his samurais, and the leaders of Nintendo and CMA stood triumphant, their spirits lifted by their indomitable will and the power of unity. They knew that the spirit of gaming, the bonds forged in battle, and their unwavering dedication to their legacies would forever safeguard the realm they held dear.

Thus, Emperor Jimbo and his loyal samurais, having defended the honor of PlayStation, etched their names in the annals of gaming history, their reunion a testament to the unbreakable bonds forged in the fires of war.

uSvqteTuFWziqJc-800x450-noPad.jpg
The Last YoJimbo
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?



giphy.gif





We *know* the email is not about the Acti acquisition as the lawyers originally claim, since it far predates any talks between MS and Acti about it.

We *don't know* the actual content of the email and what context Booty said that in.

We *know* based on the docket from Totilo that as part of the exhibits there is one email from 2019 from Totilo about Game Pass ARPU.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
How would you know it's fake if you know nothing about what it says? That's the point.

The fact that it predates MS even approaching ACTI by 2+ years is enough to disprove the original claim:

Because it supposedly shows an Xbox exec saying that the plan around buying Activision is to put PlayStation out of business

They made various other partnerships between 2019 and 2022, it could be about any one of them.

Hell, it's more likely Booty was talking about Double Fine, like I posted before, since it's closer to the dates.

But then again, it could also be about Game Pass, at least it looks that way.

FzHkyqMWAAARFvO



We won't know until we see the unredacted email for sure.

But we can very safely rule out this being about Acti just based on the timeline.

Thank you. 🙏
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
Nope, I'm only basing what I said about what is being presented here.

As far as we know, this is a claim made by lawyers representing the Gamers lawsuit, a claim that might well be hyperbole or a deliberately skewed interpretation.

The fact that it’s dated 2019 also means it clearly doesn’t refer to this acquisition and predates any offer for Bethesda.

If the unredacted email was so damaging, you’d have to assume this would have been brought up by other regulators.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
giphy.gif





We *know* the email is not about the Acti acquisition as the lawyers originally claim, since it far predates any talks between MS and Acti about it.

We *don't know* the actual content of the email and what context Booty said that in.

We *know* based on the docket from Totilo that as part of the exhibits there is one email from 2019 from Totilo about Game Pass ARPU.

Wrong. We don't know the dates of that email without seeing the emails. If the docket exhibit you are referencing is the one below then that is Microsoft's exhibit and not the "gamers" lawyers. You are making assumptions on Microsoft's behalf while wanting hard proof otherwise. You can't have it both ways.

FzIuYkXX0AEaFt_
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Well, the CMA and FTC are preventing this one. You should all support those blocks then, shouldn't you? 🤔
The cognitive dissonance, I swear.

We *know* the email is not about the Acti acquisition as the lawyers originally claim
No, we don't.

The lawyers believe it was showing a foundation for their plans we see today. Their desires that they're acting out on.

You are making assumptions on Microsoft's behalf while wanting hard proof otherwise. You can't have it both ways.
boom smile GIF
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Wrong. We don't know the dates of that email without seeing the emails. If the docket exhibit you are referencing is the one below then that is Microsoft's exhibit and not the "gamers" lawyers. You are making assumptions on Microsoft's behalf while wanting hard proof otherwise. You can't have it both ways.

FzIuYkXX0AEaFt_

Wait but you were so sure about who the culprit is before ...

We already know the name here. Matt Booty.


Phil Spencer =/= Matt Booty. The article is specifically talking an email sent by Matt to Tim Stuart.

We're not .. we're not just changing goal posts now, are we ? 😲



No, we don't.

The lawyers believe it was showing a foundation for their plans we see today. Their desires that they're acting out on.


The lawyers believe or you want it to be believed that way ?
 
Last edited:
Wow sony and their fanboys are getting desperate I see. It's kinda sad how pathetic these people are that they have this much love/obsession with a corporation

Why Is this a new thread when isn't this old. Didn't we have threads about this awhile ago? The salesmans statement means very little just like JimmyBoys statements meant very little right? Y'all need to move on and stop JOing to billion dollar corporations
Exactly, besides, why JO a billion dollar corpo, when you can go balls on chin on a trillion dollar one?

Right...?
 
Last edited:

Topher

Identifies as young
Wait but you were so sure about who the culprit is before ...




Phil Spencer =/= Matt Booty. The article is specifically talking an email sent by Matt to Tim Stuart.

We're not .. we're not just changing goal posts now, are we ? 😲

Nope. I wasn't the guy pounding the Bible about these emails being redacted. That was you. And now YOU are the guy saying we know stuff about the emails......because Microsoft says so. Factually, you moved the goal posts. Not me.
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
We know that is what a Microsoft rep said. Nothing more.



By buying Bethesda and Activision Blizzard King (possibly others) and making their content exclusive to Xbox.
I think that Xbox is getting a pretty rude awakening when it comes to this just looking at the Microsoft/Activision acquisition.

While they may have the money to do it, I think regulators will eventually stop them. I personally think they should have stopped before Bethesda. Not for regulation concern or anything...it's just that their approach is hands off, offering monetary support or technical support alone.

I just don't think that's going to help make better games. They are picking up studios on the brink of collapse. Giving them money and technical support doesn't necessarily address the root problem. I hope they start asking themselves why the devs faltered in the first place...in the same space where others succeed.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
I think that Xbox is getting a pretty rude awakening when it comes to this just looking at the Microsoft/Activision acquisition.

While they may have the money to do it, I think regulators will eventually stop them. I personally think they should have stopped before Bethesda. Not for regulation concern or anything...it's just that their approach is hands off, offering monetary support or technical support alone.

I just don't think that's going to help make better games. They are picking up studios on the brink of collapse. Giving them money and technical support doesn't necessarily address the root problem. I hope they start asking themselves why the devs faltered in the first place...in the same space where others succeed.
When companies as big as MS don't get their way, they go scorched earth. Which is why you are supposed to have a working merger regulation sector. It can cripple industries and economies.
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
When companies as big as MS don't get their way, they go scorched earth. Which is why you are supposed to have a working merger regulation sector. It can cripple industries and economies.
You think this is likely with Activision Blizzard merger? From what I understand, this would be a very long drawn out battle that in the end would not be worth the trouble. Of course there can be other attempts at this, maybe smaller acquisitions.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Nope. I wasn't the guy pounding the Bible about these emails being redacted. That was you.

Yes, I am calling a redacted email redacted.


And now YOU are the guy saying we know stuff about the emails......because Microsoft says so. Factually, you moved the goal posts. Not me.


How ?

I have not changed my stance on the original email, only on the lawyers claim about it being related to the active acquisition going on, which the dates prove is not true.

You're focusing less on the content and context of the discussion and more on trying to do a gacha here.

As far as the general strategy of winning against a competitor, it's certainly not a unique concept.




0EAtqwd.jpg
 
Last edited:

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
You think this is likely with Activision Blizzard merger? From what I understand, this would be a very long drawn out battle that in the end would not be worth the trouble. Of course there can be other attempts at this, maybe smaller acquisitions.
I meant it as to why they are purchasing up the industry. They failed, started blaming the opposition to their failures, no introspection, all hubris and hypocrisy, thus they buy everything up regardless of the ramifications that it will have in the race to the bottom.
 
Top Bottom