It bothers me because Kark is someone that I could see scum trying to knock out early, the highly erratic play can knock out a scum without much chance for defense and they could be trying to avoid that. Coming off of just watching Kark running around free lynching in Love Boat, I could see that connection.
3/4ths of the last page was cluttered with batcomputer/prep time nonsense. Something tells me mafia will be glad to see him live.
I'm not done with the Batcomputer.
Free lynching? I kicked scum's ass in that game. I fully expect scum to be afraid of me.
That's what I get for paying half attention whilst playing SFV. I meant Sorian.
I'm also wary of you, weemadarthur, for the same reason but to a greater extent because they are superficial means to appear helpful.
I don't quite understand your second sentence. I'm more suspicious than Sorian because you think I'm fake scum hunting? Is that it?
Something I did notice while looking back through the thread is that Flame hasn't really commented on anything game-wise since we've started. Mostly mechanical stuff like scum numbers but no real reading or reactions. He answered weemad's questions from earlier today but they weren't exactly hard hitting questions. And he originally RNG voted Kark but then changed the reasoning later to keep the vote on saying he didn't approve of the no lynch vote. It bothers me because Kark is someone that I could see scum trying to knock out early, the highly erratic play can knock out a scum without much chance for defense and they could be trying to avoid that. Coming off of just watching Kark running around free lynching in Love Boat, I could see that connection.
What is making you town read Coppa then?Nearly every game I've played has had Coppa in it, and we've always been on the same team. Currently, he's playing like he did when he was town, at least to me. Though he hasn't thrown around his vote as much as he normally does. (Maybe he's trying to keep a low profile in the first day or two. Or he's just busy right now.)
In reality, it wasn't RNG in the first place. Just a nice, fun vote. His no lynch vote, even though it's retracted now, is enough for me to keep my vote on him for now.
What is making you town read Coppa then?
This is my issue though. Joke votes are fine, I don't mind them but something smells weird when someone finds reason to keep them in place. It gives a level of deniability later if the person ends up flipping town.
Mazre, I guessI don't quite understand your second sentence. I'm more suspicious than Sorian because you think I'm fake scum hunting? Is that it?
Karkador, it's all great to see information from the batcomputer. But what is your reads list? Please do a complete one so the AI thingy doesn't contribute more than you do.
Xam, if the day were to end in an hour, who would you lynch? Do you have any hard hitting questions to ask anyone?
Wait wait wait.
Xam, you're annoyed that we can't beat karkador into submission.....but you won't even try it yourself?
Hypocrisy is a major scumtell. Post something useful, quick, to make up for your...ambiguous start.
I honestly don't care enough to muster up the energy by this pointWait wait wait.
Xam, you're annoyed that we can't beat karkador into submission.....but you won't even try it yourself?
Hypocrisy is a major scumtell. Post something useful, quick, to make up for your...ambiguous start.
Yeah, that's pretty accurate.
Is there a reason that you're coaching Xam on how not to be scummy?
Wait wait wait.
Xam, you're annoyed that we can't beat karkador into submission.....but you won't even try it yourself?
Hypocrisy is a major scumtell. Post something useful, quick, to make up for your...ambiguous start.
Okie dokie.
Like, do you have any tips on better ways to scum hunt? I'm open to suggestions.
Princesses didn't have Karkador???
What is this? Maybe I didn't pay attention enough but you had much stronger play in Princess.
I'm not telling him anything he doesn't know. He's already admitted to a bunch of other hypocritical statements. "Hah, look at me, showing my cards". His refusal to play isn't making me feel any better about him.
???
What is this? Maybe I didn't pay attention enough but you had much stronger play in Princess.
So vote for him or detail exactly what he is doing wrong to convince others to vote for him. Telling him how to fix his play makes you look scummier than him.
Well, crap.
When I reread that one post it does seem that way. Maybe I should go back to self imposing some post restrictions to slow myself down.
Anyway I was trying to push a fast response that would be...maybe not very well thought out. But you responded instead. Not much chance of it working after this conversation.
I honestly don't care enough to muster up the energy by this point
It's a gamble if the effort I put in would result in something that is not summarized with "beep beep boop boop"
Finally:
Sorian: Yeah, I'm actually suspicious of you for reasons other than your post count now. You are awfully defensive of other people. You are quick to step in and cover people, sparing them the job of actually defending themselves with their own words. When someone criticizes the likes of Karkador, El topo, or Xam, you swoop in and defend them with the likes of "It's how they post in every game". You are doing a very good job of playing the part of the fake town guy who is there to defend your mafia colleagues.
I think for now I'll leave my vote on you, Sorian.
Now, Camjo has made some slightly more substantial posts recently, but has also expressed some open disdain for the first day proceedings. However, I can't really accept dislike as an excuse for not participating in it. A lot of your posts have been more fluff than substance.
Subject admits Camjo has made more substantial posts recently... but is still trying to push the angle that he is not participating in Day 1? Does not compute... does not compute... DOES NOT COMPU- *explodes*
Okay, a quick perusal of the thread has proven me wrong about you defending El Topo. What I was thinking of was this post made by FluzWaveZ instead. I misremembered it as one of yours since it is similar to other posts you have made. FluzWaveZ's similar avatar color palette doesn't help matters.Meh, finding town is just as important as finding scum. If I think something isn't particularly scummy behavior and someone is trying to make a big deal about it then I'm going to call that person out. Take it how you will. Let's play a game though since I'm pretty sure you just chose some names at random there. Find me a post where I defended El Topo.
I ask you to do that because I'm pretty sure I haven't, I've actually been one of Topo's attackers over his attitude about reads list and just generally not wanting to play.
It's El Topo's modus operandi in every game I've played with him. Don't read into it as a sign of alignment too much.
Back in posts 350 through 352, I ask Karkador a question, you step in to cover for Karkador, and then Karkador bypasses responding to me entirely by quoting your response to me.
Anyways, I would like to see people defend themselves with their own words. I don't know them like you do, and I am still waiting for Karkador to explain himself to me. Back in posts 350 through 352, I ask Karkador a question, you step in to cover for Karkador, and then Karkador bypasses responding to me entirely by quoting your response to me. Now, I don't necessarily think Karkador is scum, but I don't yet trust you enough to just take your word for it.
What's with this semantics argument?
In our current information vacuum (with the exception of the Batcomputer), 12 people in this game have a vote dropped on them, and 6 people have no vote on them.
I'm not stating anything conclusively with that, but I think it's a point of interest.
You'll actually notice that Kark just straight up ignored you. I didn't cover for him, I asked him a question too and he decided to answer me with snark instead of an actual answer:
Don't worry, I'd actually love if you pushed Kark more, I do think he is town at the moment but I have no clue how scum Kark acts so I'm hardly sure of that analysis.
Yes, it is true that it is ultimately on Karkador that he ignored my questioning, but your post did seem like you were saying: "Kark always acts like this, don't think too much about it." Which seems to be along the lines of several of your other posts on Karkador. Furthermore, you yourself never brought up the fact that he ignored me, even though you were in the middle of a page-long discussion with him. If you thought that his ignoring me was significant, you certainly didn't bring it up. Instead, you seemed to be getting more defensive that you were on his list, even though though that list was blatantly nonsensical and pointless.You'll actually notice that Kark just straight up ignored you. I didn't cover for him, I asked him a question too and he decided to answer me with snark instead of an actual answer:
Don't worry, I'd actually love if you pushed Kark more, I do think he is town at the moment but I have no clue how scum Kark acts so I'm hardly sure of that analysis.
FWIW, if you want to do some metagame research, I was that dandy serial killer in S1. It's the only time I've been scum.
That's two contradictions in one, SkyOdin.
Yes, it is true that it is ultimately on Karkador that he ignored my questioning, but your post did seem like you were saying: "Kark always acts like this, don't think too much about it." Which seems to be along the lines of several of your other posts on Karkador. Furthermore, you yourself never brought up the fact that he ignored me, even though you were in the middle of a page-long discussion with him. If you thought that his ignoring me was significant, you certainly didn't bring it up. Instead, you seemed to be getting more defensive that you were on his list, even though though that list was blatantly nonsensical and pointless.
It hasn't though? The list existing is what has gotten under my skin. I could have been omitted from the list completely as a forgotten player and it would still be bugging me. You posted something that I am convinced is random and tried to play it off like something that mattered (you still do with little remarks like "the information vacuum we are in (well except for the batcomputer of course). You can say you aren't hiding behind it but this is your only meaningful contribution today (well that and some conversation on neutrals and probing if we think two face would be one such neutral). Most questions that people direct at you go ignored or brushed to the side.
Would you care elaborating on what contradictions you are looking at, and what you are taking away from them? I would happily explain, but I am also curious on what your take on it is.
You know, the more I think about the claim made by Mazre. The less and less I like it. It seems so opportunistic and it only really serves to either benefit himself or scum, neither of which I want helped. A claim, especially something like ordinary where one doesn't really matter anymore just makes scum that more likely to hit a power role tonight. In all honesty, Kark is probably town, but I'm not convinced yet and will look more closely on Day 2 after we have some deaths to go off of. Scum has no reason to ever hit Mazre now as he is a pointless target, the longer he lives the more suspicious his claim will get, so I think a lynch now might be most useful for us all. This vote might start a bit of a bandwagon though as I think he is now going to be at 3(?), but hopefully people give reasons.
Unvote
Vote: Mazre
There's nothing special about them, but I'm stating that they are there.
1. In what way was *I* the one who seemingly interrupted your dialogue with Karkador between posts 350 and 352? Were you talking about Sorian? I asked you for a link, because I am not seeing it. That didn't happen.
2. As Sorian elaborated on above, it didn't seem like anyone was covering for Karkador at all. Someone ignoring you or deciding to not reply to what you're saying and instead choosing to reply to someone else doesn't mean that the "someone else" is covering for them.
No, it wasn't you covering for Sorian. I think you were covering for some of El topo's behavior earlier in the thread using similar logic: "That was how that poster posts, so don't think anything about it". I simply don't like that way of thinking for two reasons:There's nothing special about them, but I'm stating that they are there.
1. In what way was *I* the one who seemingly interrupted your dialogue with Karkador between posts 350 and 352? Were you talking about Sorian? I asked you for a link, because I am not seeing it. That didn't happen.
2. As Sorian elaborated on above, it didn't seem like anyone was covering for Karkador at all. Someone ignoring you or deciding to not reply to what you're saying and instead choosing to reply to someone else doesn't mean that the "someone else" is covering for them.
You are misreading his post on point 1. He is saying I somehow interrupted his dialogue with Kark. He mentioned you and quoted you because he misremembered a post you made and attributed it to me, a defense of El Topo.
I simply don't like that way of thinking for two reasons:
1) It leads nowhere but a dead end.
2) I don't know these posters as well, so it requires me to trust people I can't yet trust.
It would simply be bad play for me to just go along with these statements.